Florida Statute 11.62 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.62

11.62 Legislative review of proposed regulation of unregulated functions.—

(1) This section may be cited as the “Sunrise Act.”

(2) It is the intent of the Legislature:

(a) That no profession or occupation be subject to regulation by the state unless the regulation is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare from significant and discernible harm or damage and that the police power of the state be exercised only to the extent necessary for that purpose; and

(b) That no profession or occupation be regulated by the state in a manner that unnecessarily restricts entry into the practice of the profession or occupation or adversely affects the availability of the professional or occupational services to the public.

(3) In determining whether to regulate a profession or occupation, the Legislature shall consider the following factors:

(a) Whether the unregulated practice of the profession or occupation will substantially harm or endanger the public health, safety, or welfare, and whether the potential for harm is recognizable and not remote;

(b) Whether the practice of the profession or occupation requires specialized skill or training, and whether that skill or training is readily measurable or quantifiable so that examination or training requirements would reasonably assure initial and continuing professional or occupational ability;

(c) Whether the regulation will have an unreasonable effect on job creation or job retention in the state or will place unreasonable restrictions on the ability of individuals who seek to practice or who are practicing a given profession or occupation to find employment;

(d) Whether the public is or can be effectively protected by other means; and

(e) Whether the overall cost-effectiveness and economic impact of the proposed regulation, including the indirect costs to consumers, will be favorable.

(4) The proponents of legislation that provides for the regulation of a profession or occupation not already expressly subject to state regulation shall provide, upon request, the following information in writing to the state agency that is proposed to have jurisdiction over the regulation and to the legislative committees to which the legislation is referred:

(a) The number of individuals or businesses that would be subject to the regulation;

(b) The name of each association that represents members of the profession or occupation, together with a copy of its codes of ethics or conduct;

(c) Documentation of the nature and extent of the harm to the public caused by the unregulated practice of the profession or occupation, including a description of any complaints that have been lodged against persons who have practiced the profession or occupation in this state during the preceding 3 years;

(d) A list of states that regulate the profession or occupation, and the dates of enactment of each law providing for such regulation and a copy of each law;

(e) A list and description of state and federal laws that have been enacted to protect the public with respect to the profession or occupation and a statement of the reasons why these laws have not proven adequate to protect the public;

(f) A description of the voluntary efforts made by members of the profession or occupation to protect the public and a statement of the reasons why these efforts are not adequate to protect the public;

(g) A copy of any federal legislation mandating regulation;

(h) An explanation of the reasons why other types of less restrictive regulation would not effectively protect the public;

(i) The cost, availability, and appropriateness of training and examination requirements;

(j) The cost of regulation, including the indirect cost to consumers, and the method proposed to finance the regulation;

(k) The cost imposed on applicants or practitioners or on employers of applicants or practitioners as a result of the regulation;

(l) The details of any previous efforts in this state to implement regulation of the profession or occupation; and

(m) Any other information the agency or the committee considers relevant to the analysis of the proposed legislation.

(5) The agency shall provide the Legislature with information concerning the effect of proposed legislation that provides for new regulation of a profession or occupation regarding:

(a) The departmental resources necessary to implement and enforce the proposed regulation;

(b) The technical sufficiency of the proposal for regulation, including its consistency with the regulation of other professions and occupations under existing law; and

(c) If applicable, any alternatives to the proposed regulation which may result in a less restrictive or more cost-effective regulatory scheme.

(6) When making a recommendation concerning proposed legislation providing for new regulation of a profession or occupation, a legislative committee shall determine:

(a) Whether the regulation is justified based on the criteria specified in subsection (3), the information submitted pursuant to request under subsection (4), and the information provided under subsection (5);

(b) The least restrictive and most cost-effective regulatory scheme that will adequately protect the public; and

(c) The technical sufficiency of the proposed legislation, including its consistency with the regulation of other professions and occupations under existing law.

History.—s. 6, ch. 91-429; s. 1, ch. 94-218; s. 133, ch. 99-251.

F.S. 11.62 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.62 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.62

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.62

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 11.62.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 11.62

Total Results: 20

JACQUELINE GIRARD v. TIMOTHY GIRARD

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-11-29T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: her permanent alimony payments from $13,500 to $11,062 per month. Because there was no substantial and… reducing the alimony payments from $13,500 to $11,062 a month. The trial court found that “[t]he Former…Former Wife has a shortfall and resulting need of $11,062 per month.” From this judgment, the wife appeals

Estate of Arroyo v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 211 So. 3d 240, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 456

Snippet: Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-19660 & 11-62 ________________

Reyes v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-17T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-19660 & 11-62 ________________

Ledet v. Campo

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 128 So. 3d 1034, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 1193, 2013 WL 811609, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 414

Snippet: 11), 68 So.3d 1099, writ denied, 11-636 (La.5/6/11), 62 So.3d 127; Tech. Control Sys., Inc. v. Green, 01

Florida Department of Financial Services v. Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-Middle Region

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-11-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 969 So. 2d 527, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18685, 2007 WL 4145459

Snippet: paid by them to lobbyists in violation of section 11.062, Florida Statutes.1 OFI’s recommendation was never…than an executive agency, and therefore section 11.062 did not apply to CCRC-M.2 On January 11, 2007, …to the order, the Department “construes Section 11.062 to mean that CCRC-MR is an executive agency” prohibited…applicability interprets and implements Section 11.062.” On January 12, 2007, the Department filed its… to collect funds spent in violation of section 11.062. A recommendation which, standing alone, does not

Bell v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2007-06-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 965 So. 2d 48

Snippet: substantiate his assertions. Postconviction Order at 11. *62 Trial counsel has a duty to investigate any potential

Coral Imaging Services v. Geico Indem. Ins.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-10-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 955 So. 2d 11

Snippet: e.g., Art. III, § 8(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. Stat. § 11.062(2)(a); § 11.066(4); § 11.70(3)(d); § 14.29(3)(b

Lenart v. Ocwen Financial Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-02-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 869 So. 2d 588

Snippet: deficiency was due and owing to OCWEN in the amount of $11,062.98. The insurer subsequently settled the insurance

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2002-02-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: 5 See, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 97-82 (1997) (s. 11.062[2], Fla. Stat., restricting use of state funds

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2000-02-08T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: among them section 11.062, Florida Statutes. The opinion notes that section 11.062, Florida Statutes, … Fla. 97-58 (1997). 13 Section 11.062(1), Fla. Stat. 14 Section 11.062(2), Fla. Stat. 15 See, Op. Att&… of the department. You have also cited section 11.062, Florida Statutes. It is unnecessary to make a …River Commission comes within the scope of section 11.062, Florida Statutes, or other statutes prohibiting…#39;y Gen. Fla. 97-82 (1997), concluding that s.11.062(2), Fla. Stat., does not apply to school districts

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1998-04-06T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: the lobbying restrictions contained in section 11.062(2)(a), Florida Statutes.6 Members of the school

Nylen v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-03-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 707 So. 2d 409, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2624, 1998 WL 115860

Snippet: pursuant to section 775.083, plus a surcharge of $11.62 pursuant to section 960.25, because the trial court

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1998-03-02T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: state or that conflict with a state law. Section 11.062(1), Florida Statutes, allows the use of state employee

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1997-11-25T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Attorney General RAB/tgk 1 Section 11.062(2)(c), Fla. Stat. 2 See, s. 11.062(2)(b) and (d), Fla. Stat. 3 See…following question: Do the provisions of section 11.062(2), Florida Statutes, restricting the use of state…school district? In sum: The provisions of section 11.062(2), Florida Statutes, restricting the use of state…executive branch. You note the provisions of section 11.062(2), Florida Statutes, and state that is it unclear…section11.062(2) to district school boards. Section 11.062(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provides: "A department

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1997-09-08T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: funds it receives will be appropriated.7 Section 11.062, Florida Statutes, in pertinent part, provides:…activities subject to the restrictions in section 11.062, Florida Statutes. Sincerely, Robert A. Butterworth

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1988-11-28T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: accomplish any legitimate county purpose). 6 Compare, s. 11.062, F.S., providing that no funds, exclusive of salaries

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1985-01-09T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: observed that the college president relied upon s 11.062, F.S. as authority for such expenditures by college…since this office in AGO 77-8, concluded that s 11.062 (which by its terms is applicable only to employees

INS. CO. OF ST., PA v. Estate of Guzman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-10-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 421 So. 2d 597

Snippet: v. New York Tank Barge Corp., 314 U.S. 104, 110-11, 62 S.Ct. 156, 160-61, 89 L.Ed. 89 (1941), which held

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1978-03-08T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: the manner contemplated by your letter. Cf. s. 11.062, F. S., which sets forth a general state policy

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1977-01-31T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: amended by Ch. 72-625, Laws of Florida, does s. 11.062, F. S. 1975, prohibit the appropriation of public…See Stanson v. Mott, supra, at 8. Also compare s. 11.062, F. S., which sets forth a general state policy