The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Thomas, 3 Criminal Constitutional Law § 14.03[3] (2019); W. LaFave, J. Israel, N. King, & O. . . .
. . . tire from the undercarriage of the truck and discovered 14 vacuum-sealed packages inside, containing 14.03 . . .
. . . Montgomery Park had used "reasonable commercial efforts" to mitigate its damages, as required in § 14.03 . . .
. . . Id. at § 14.03 [1], p. 14-10. . . .
. . . Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed. 2011) (Areeda . . .
. . . (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 at 14-15))). . . .
. . . Art, XIII. .See MSA Secs. 3,01, 3.05, 4.02, 6.02, 7.02, 9.01, 9.03, and 14.03. . MSA, at 35-36. . . . .
. . . Cohen, Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.03[1], at 944 (2012 ed.) [hereinafter Cohen’s]. . . .
. . . Securacom Inc., 224 F.3d 273, 279-80 (3d Cir.2000); 3-14 Gilson on Trademarks § 14.03 (2015). . . . Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1205 (11th Cir.2001); 3-14 Gilson on Trademarks § 14.03 (2015) ("Under . . .
. . . Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law § 14.03 (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 4th . . . Ar-eeda & Hovenkamp, supra, § 14.03. . . .
. . . . §§ 14.358,, 14.03. . . .
. . . of 63, or 7.93 percent) was 55.52 percent of the comparable rate for white candidates (70 of 499, or 14.03 . . .
. . . only Cornelius — up to an ounce of cocaine a day from the end of 2011 until May 2013, resulting in 14.03 . . .
. . . s proposed instruction was taken from 1 Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 14.03 . . .
. . . Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed.2011)); accord . . .
. . . .” § 14.03. . . .
. . . Parties Positions as to Valuation of Collateral Ponce de León 14.03, Inc. . . .
. . . . § 14.03[2][b], at 954 (“[T]he very concept of enrollment and maintenance of citizenship lists is largely . . .
. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 3.02[3], at 133 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012); see also id, § 14.03 . . .
. . . Bylaws § 14.03. . . .
. . . Bylaws § 14.03. . . .
. . . by the plaintiff.” 1 Marsh & Volk, Practice Under the California Securities Laws (rev. ed. 2006) § 14.03 . . .
. . . Pattern Jury Instruct. 14.03(1) (manufacturing), with 6 Cir. . . .
. . . Areeda and Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law, § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed. 2011)). . . .
. . . This argument is clearly foreclosed by section 14.03, which provides that “economic conditions which . . .
. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B] (1993). . . .
. . . Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .
. . . Subsection 14.03 required any amendment to the agreement to be in writing. . . .
. . . . §§ 14.03, 14.04. . . . Bylaws §§ 1.01, 14.03. . . . Bylaws § 14.03. . . . Bylaws § 14.03, and change their university’s admissions policies — either by entirely revoking the delegation . . .
. . . Areeda and Herbert Hovenkamp, Fundamentals of Antitrust Law, § 14.03(b), at 14-25 (4th ed.2011) (footnotes . . .
. . . No. 94-1476, at 161, 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5777 (1976)); see also 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 (same . . . Id. § 14.03. . . . ingredients of remoteness and speculation tend to interact in actual eases. 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 . . .
. . . Frolick and Brown, Advising the Elderly or Disabled Client, ¶ 14.03[4] (2nd ed.2011). . . .
. . . Russell M, Robinson II, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law § 14.03 (7th ed. 2009). . . .
. . . to the plaintiff on the underlying claim.” 3 James William Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 14.03 . . .
. . . Polar Bear, 384 F.3d at 711 (quoting 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B]). . . . See 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 (“The first inquiry looks to defining the permissible scope of gross . . .
. . . No. 29, Ex. 1, Art XVII, § 14.03 (“[N]o subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this . . .
. . . Polar Bear, 384 F.3d at 711; see also 4 Nimmer § 14.03, 14-34 (“When an infringer’s profits are only . . .
. . . insurance beginning with his June 4, 2008 paycheck, and $15.95 for the $50,000 in optional life insurance, $14.03 . . .
. . . See Nimmer § 14.03[B][2][d] n. 120. . Mr. . . .
. . . See generally Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.03[2][b] (Nell Jessup Newton et al. eds., 2005 . . . See Cohen § 14.03[2][c][iii] (noting that equal protection-based claims by non-Indians challenging religious . . .
. . . See generally Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 14.03[2][b] (Nell Jessup Newton et al. eds., 2005 . . . See Cohen § 14.03[2][e][iii] (noting that equal protection-based claims by non-Indians challenging religious . . .
. . . LEXIS 96711, at *38 (citing 2 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 14.03[1][b], at 14-35, and Racer v. . . .
. . . .”); 3 Anne Gilson Lalonde & Jerome Gilson, Gilson on Trademarks § 14.03(9)(a)(ii)(G) (2009 ed.) . . .
. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B] (1993)). . . .
. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 14.03 (3d ed.1977). . . .
. . . LEXIS 96711, at *38 (citing 2 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 14.03[l][b], at 14-35, and Racer v. . . .
. . . Proc.Code Ann. art. 14.03(d); Adams v. . . .
. . . Sections 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.27, 2.28, 2.34, 5.03, 8.01, 8.02, 9.04, 9.06, 11.01, 14.02, 14.03 . . .
. . . notice of application under Rule 14.05 whereas ‘action’ is commenced by statement of claim under Rule 14.03 . . .
. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .
. . . Renosky, 399 F.3d 168, 176 (3d Cir.2005); Gilson § 14.03[2]; see also Calmann § 23:56. . . . specifically targeted, a plaintiff is also entitled to a presumption of money-damages”); Gilson, § 14.03 . . . Broan, 923 F.2d at 1236; see also Gilson § 14.03[3][a] (“recovery is not precluded merely because the . . .
. . . the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in both intrastate and interstate commerce.” 540 Mass.Code Regs. 14.03 . . .
. . . See 4-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B] (2008) (“ *[A]11 gross revenue is presumed to be profit “attributable . . . percentage of his gross revenue than he could have absent the infringement.’ ” 4-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 . . . See 4-14 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03. . . . Speculative profits HMH points to Nimmer on Copyright, 4-14 § 14.03[B][2], for the proposition that “ . . .
. . . Prudential, 148 F.3d at 341, quoting in turn 3 Herbert Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions, § 14.03 . . .
. . . Cir.2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis in original); see also Nimmer § 14.03 . . .
. . . Paragraph 9.01(a) requires that notice be given, and ¶ 14.03, the notice and cure provision, provides . . . proffered to support these claims; no notice and an opportunity to cure was provided as required by ¶ 14.03 . . .
. . . Proc. art. 14.01 & 14.03; Drago v. State, 553 S.W.2d 375, 377 (Tex.Crim. App.1977). . . .
. . . applying its experience, wisdom and judicial acumen to the facts at hand.” 3-14 Gilson on Teademaeks § 14.03 . . .
. . . Practice § 14.03. . . .
. . . are frequently awarded in common fund cases when the lodestar method is applied” (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 . . .
. . . 21 as an alternate basis for its holding); 2-6 Chisum on Patents § 6.02; 4A-14 Chisum on Patents § 14.03 . . .
. . . speculatively attributable to the infringement, courts will deny recovery to the copyright owner.” 4 Nimmer § 14.03 . . .
. . . (Id. at § 14.03.) . . . H at § 14.03.) . . .
. . . See Liberty Township Zoning Resolution § 14.03(a). . . . .
. . . on Copyright § 14.02[A][1] (2006); 3 -14 Jerome Gilson, et al., Trademark Protection and Practice § 14.03 . . .
. . . Holmes, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Business Organizations § 14.03 (West 1999). . . . .
. . . if the Company is acting as its own Paying Agent, segregate and hold in trust as provided in Section 14.03 . . .
. . . if the Company is acting as its own Paying Agent, segregate and hold in trust as provided in Section 14.03 . . .
. . . Nimmer § 14.03[A] at 14-42; On Davis, 246 F.3d at 160. . . . But see Nimmer § 14.03(B)(3) at 14-56 n. 81-6 (noting possibility that standards may differ). . . . .
. . . follows: Estimated Option I — Total Labor Cost/per hour Fixed Fee/per hour (154,800 manhours) $2,172,019/$14.03 . . . ESTIMATED FIXED FEE/ Option I — Total LABOR COST/PER HOUR PER HOUR (154,800 man hours) $2,172,019/$14.03 . . .
. . . an opportunity to cure its failure to secure a license for the Ketchup Song, as required by section 14.03 . . .
. . . Prudential II, 148 F.3d at 341 (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 at 14-5). . . .
. . . Plan § 14.03(j). . . .
. . . Lease § 14.03(c)®. . . . for alterations were to be reviewed by Silverstein’s “architects, engineers or other consultants” § 14.03 . . . Lease § 14.03(c)(i). . . . disapprove the system for its potential to “jeopardize the structural integrity of the building,” Lease, § 14.03 . . . insured under a policy or policies containing ... permission to release liability,” Lease, § 12.06(d), § 14.03 . . .
. . . federal court, must be supported by federal subject matter jurisdiction.... 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.03 . . .
. . . evidence of gross revenue duly apportioned to relate to the infringement.” 4 Nimmer On Copyright § 14.03 . . . in claiming profits beyond what might be attributable to the infringement, 4 Nimmer On Copyright § 14.03 . . .
. . . Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .
. . . Section 14.03 provides that each partner shall pay its share of arbitration fees. . . . Section 14.03 of the Partnership Agreement indicates that no matter listed in Annex A shall constitute . . .
. . . .” § 14.03(j). . . .
. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[B], at 14-39 (1996)). . . .
. . . See 4 Nimmer, supra, § 14.03(D), at 14^41 (parties may consent to bench trial). . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.03[1], at 14-12 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 2002) (“Third-party practice . . . See, e.g., 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.03[1], at 14— 12 (Matthew Bender 3d ed. 2002) ("Because the . . .
. . . , Plaintiffs' Notice of Filing Documents; Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 27, Tenn-Care Rules, Rule 1200-13-14.03 . . .
. . . Id. at 914 (quoting Frank Music, 772 F.2d at 517); see also 4 Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.03[A]; On Davis . . .
. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[A] (2002) (explaining that, “[i]t does not suffice . . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03[A] (2002) (citing Business Trends Analysts, Inc. v . . .
. . . follow the proper grievance procedure regarding the aforementioned breaches, and (5) violated §§ 12.02, 14.03 . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 14.03[1] (3d ed.2001) (emphasis supplied). . . .
. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.03[A], at 14-15 (1985)). . . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 14.03[A], at 14-29 (2001) (“When an infringer’s profits are only remotely . . .
. . . Volk, Practice Under the California Securities Laws § 14.03[2][a] (2001) (stating that § 25401 does not . . . Volk, Practice Under the California Securities Laws § 14.03[2][a] (2001) (stating that § 25401 does not . . .
. . . (quoting 3 Newberg § 14.03 at 14-5)). . . . .
. . . the infringer, such claims are difficult to prove and are often unsuccessful. 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.03 . . . Nimmer, On Copyright, § 14.03[A]; Roy Export Co. v. . . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer On Copyright § 14.03[A] at 14-29 (1998) (when an infringer’s profits are . . .
. . . 148 F.3d 283, 341 (3d Cir.1998) (quoting 3 Herbert New-berg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions, § 14.03 . . .
. . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 14.03 (3d ed.1992). . . .
. . . This resulted in interest rates ranging from a low in 1940 of 0/01% to a high of 14.03% in 1981. . . .
. . . Ann. art. 14.03 (Vernon Supp.2001). . . . Article 14.03(g) provides: A peace officer listed in Subdivision (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5), Article . . . Art. 14.03(g)(emphasis added). . . . Article 14.03(g) affirmatively authorizes only “rangers and officers commissioned by the Public Safety . . . Ann. art. 14.03(g) (Vernon Supp.2001). . . .
. . . Minner & David Minner, Minner on Copyright § 14.03 (1993) (footnotes omitted). Walker v. . . .
. . . Conte, Attorney Fee Awards § 2.06 (1993), p. 39 (multiplier of 5-10); 3 Newberg on Class Actions § 14.03 . . .
. . . foreclosed in the market for the tied product. 3 J. von Kalinowski, [Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation] § 14.03 . . . commerce affected in the tied product is measured in terms of dollar volume. 3 J. von Kalinowski, supra § 14.03 . . .
. . . indemnified by the carrier ‘over whose line or route the loss or injury occurred .... ’ ”); Sorkin, § 14.03 . . .
. . . 148 F.3d 283, 341 (3d Cir.1998) (quoting 3 Herbert Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions, S 14.03 . . .