15.15
Publication of summaries of documents; charge.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
15.15 Publication of summaries of documents; charge.—The Department of State may in its discretion publish summaries of all instruments, papers, or documents filed with it pursuant to any law and may establish a reasonable fee for providing such service. All fees collected hereunder shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund.
History.—s. 1, ch. 67-392; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2022 · leading case: Garrido v. Markus, Winter & Spitale Law Firm
Garrido v. Markus, Winter & Spitale Law Firm (1978)
“As stated in 3 Moore's Federal Practice, Section 15.15, page 1046: "`In addition to demonstrating this absence of prejudice, to qualify under the exception to the general rule, the plaintiff had to show that his failure to join the correct parties at the outset had not been due…”
Galuppi v. Viele (1970)
“As stated in 3 Moore's Federal Practice, Section 15.15, page 1046: "In addition to demonstrating this absence of prejudice, to qualify under the exception to the general rule, the plaintiff had to show that his failure to join the correct parties at the outset had not been due…”
Maas Bros. v. Peo (1986)
“Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 15.15, the above concept was explained as follows: Claimant has been subjected to a particular risk because of his employment, the risk of crossing certain railway tracks near the plant entrance, for example.”
Click v. Pardoll (1978)
“); Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure, Section 448; 3 Moore's Federal Practice, Section 15.15 at pages 1040-41; and Galuppi v.”
LAURA ESTERBROOK, etc. v. MASTEC, INC., etc. (2022)
“ck” of substituted party defendants in amended pleadings requires the plaintiff to demonstrate not only that the new and old defendants have such an identity of interest that the substituted defendant will not be prejudiced, but also “that his failure to join the correct parties…”
JACOBSON v. LEE (2019)
“The advantage conferred by the primacy effect is relatively small percentage taken in isolation, but the records of Florida’s elections which are before this Court demonstrate it is more than the margin of victory or defeat in a great many elections 21 See Ala.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.