The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 16.08

16.08 Superintendence and direction of state attorneys.—The Attorney General shall exercise a general superintendence and direction over the several state attorneys of the several circuits as to the manner of discharging their respective duties, and whenever requested by the state attorneys, shall give them her or his opinion upon any question of law.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2098, 1877; RS 90; GS 93; RGS 107; CGL 131; s. 48, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 16.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.08

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.08

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.08.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

EDMISTON, A. E. a v. CITY OF PORT ANGELES,, 360 F. Supp. 3d 1147 (W.D. Wash. 2018)

. . . under the Washington Constitution; strict liability under Washington's dog bite statute, RCW Chapter 16.08 . . . dismiss Edmiston's state law claim for strict liability under Washington's dog bite statute, RCW Chapter 16.08 . . .

KIMES, v. UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON,, 126 F. Supp. 3d 477 (M.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . Lee, 1A Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 16.08 (5th ed.2005)). Finally, Ms. . . .

In SKYPORT GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. v., 528 B.R. 297 (S.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . made on Wilson Vukelieh was, nonetheless, effective under the savings clause contained in Ontario Rule 16.08 . . . Ontario Rule 16.08. Finally, citing Jim Fox Enterprises v. . . . service on Wilson Vukelich could be upheld pursuant to the savings clause contained in Ontario Rule 16.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WASHINGTON,, 715 F.3d 975 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . Devitt et al., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 16.08 (6th ed. 2012); see also Kenty v. . . .

In HERMOSILLA, v., 450 B.R. 276 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2011)

. . . the Debtor’s appellate brief, 62.94 hours researching and drafting Cristina’s appellate brief, and 16.08 . . .

In HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED SECURITIES LITIGATION, 674 F. Supp. 2d 951 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . stock to close on November 16, 2007, at $14.75 per share on volume over 10 million shares, down from $16.08 . . .

A. RIVERS, C. V. a A. C. R. A. a R. v. LEDFORD, a, 666 F. Supp. 2d 603 (E.D.N.C. 2009)

. . . This works out to a 16.08 hour reduction for Mr. Corry, a 1.56 hour reduction for Mr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARRILES,, 654 F. Supp. 2d 557 (W.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Thomas Dienes et al., Newsgathering and the Law §§ 16.01-16.08 (3d. ed. 2005) (discussing development . . .

W. BREITIGAN, v. DELAWARE, 293 F. App'x 871 (3d Cir. 2008)

. . . Rather, it was based upon a combination of Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, 5th Ed., § 16.08, . . .

SPORT SUPPLY GROUP, INC. v. COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY RSKCo, 335 F.3d 453 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 16.08(a)(6) (noting that a mark can be registered as a trademark “unless it ... is likely to cause . . .

C. A. DICKERSON R. v. BAILEY,, 336 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 16.08 (allowing a Texas winery to sell unlimited quantities of wine directly to consumers at "wine . . .

BLACKMON, v. IVERSON, 324 F. Supp. 2d 602 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . See Nimmer at § 16.08[A], The Court will assume that under Pennsylvania and Virginia law, novelty and . . .

In GREATER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. O v., 282 B.R. 496 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Court Validation of Alternative Service Rule 16.08 provides Where a document has been served in a manner . . . proceedings , this Court finds Lett would be prejudiced if service were deemed effected upon him under Rule 16.08 . . .

SOUTHWEST ADVERTISING INC, s v. COUNTY OF CLARK, s, 202 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (D. Nev. 2002)

. . . They -claim that Chapter 16.08 of the Clark County Code requires the issuance of the permits. . . . The ordinance in question is Title 16, Chapter 16.08 of the Clark County Code, which deals with the installation . . .

UNITED STATES v. CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,, 184 F. Supp. 2d 723 (S.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . equivalent tons) of oil and water waste containing barium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver— 16.08% . . .

SOUTHERN STATES RACK AND FIXTURE, INC. v. SHERWIN- WILLIAMS COMPANY,, 212 F.R.D. 489 (D.S.C. 2001)

. . . See Local Civil Rule 16.08(c), D.S.C. . . .

WRENCH LLC, a v. TACO BELL CORP., 256 F.3d 446 (6th Cir. 2001)

. . . See 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 16.02 at 16-5; § 16.08[B] at 16-60. . . . See 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 16.08[B] at 16-60, 16-62. . . . requirement should not be injected by the court in implied contract actions. 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 16.08 . . .

In D. WRIGHT, a. k. a. a. k. a a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. a. k. a. v. D., 256 B.R. 626 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2000)

. . . and 3, Watts obtained a simple interest rate of 15.06 percent on Note 2 and a simple interest rate of 16.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FLEMMI,, 108 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D. Mass. 2000)

. . . Doe, 455 F.2d at 1275 (quoting 8 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 16.08[1], at 16-100 (2d ed.1970)). . . .

STAVELEY, v. ST. CHARLES HOSPITAL,, 173 F.R.D. 49 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Presbyterian Hosp., 304 N.Y. 538, 541-42, 110 N.E.2d 391, 1 Louisell & Williams, Medical Malpractice ¶ 16.08 . . .

In L. PANSIER, L. PANSIER, v. STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 208 B.R. 41 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1997)

. . . Martin, Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy § 16.08(k) (1997). . . .

In L. SCHMIDT, D., 205 B.R. 394 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1997)

. . . a tax debt even though the IRS does not file a proof of claim. 2 Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy, § 16.08 . . .

DEVITO, v. PENSION PLAN OF LOCAL I. B. T. PENSION FUND I. B. T., 975 F. Supp. 258 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . In the last four years of her participation, Plaintiff accrued $16.08 in pension benefits per year. . . .

S. MILROY, v. G. HANSON, F. D., 902 F. Supp. 1029 (D. Neb. 1995)

. . . Devitt et al., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 16.08, at 583 (1992). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEE,, 54 F.3d 1534 (10th Cir. 1995)

. . . 10th Cir.1991), see also Devitt et al., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, 4th ed., §§ 16.07 & 16.08 . . .

In WCC HOLDING CORPORATION, SALISBURY, WCC v. TEXAS COMMERCE BANK- HOUSTON, N. A., 171 B.R. 972 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . . & Com.Code § 16.08(c). . . .

B. REICH, v. CHEZ ROBERT, INC., 821 F. Supp. 967 (D.N.J. 1993)

. . . Compensation for the first unpaid work day in the amount of $16.08 is also added. . . . Thus, $2.01 x 8 = $16.08. (Tr. at 5.101.) . . . .

M. MOKOVER v. NECO ENTERPRISES, INC. MONDSCHEIN v. NECO ENTERPRISES, INC. M. MOKOVER, v. NECO ENTERPRISES, INC., 785 F. Supp. 1083 (D.R.I. 1992)

. . . Krasner P 20.1 $400 8,040.00 $180.00 16.08 $ 2,894.40 David A.P. . . .

GRIFFITH, v. JOHNSTON,, 899 F.2d 1427 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 16.08 (Vernon 1986). . . .

In NEW ENGLAND CATERERS, INC., 115 B.R. 724 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1989)

. . . The expenses listed would seem to include overhead items such as telephone, $16.08; postage, $94.17; . . .

In WASHINGTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, KSA,, 101 B.R. 944 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1989)

. . . $648.00; telephone and telegrams, $715.09; photocopies, $479.00; secretarial overtime, $238.00; postage, $16.08 . . .

COLON VELEZ, v. PUERTO RICO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. De s AFL- CIO,, 693 F. Supp. 1335 (D.P.R. 1988)

. . . Iván Cuevas Gerena, Ismael Ramos Ortiz, Pablo Rodriguez Rosario, and Santos Rivera Rivera were paid $16.08 . . . Each would have received $21,-225.60 (1,320 X $16.08 = $21,225.60), and the group would have earned $127,353.60 . . . Each would have received $12,-735.36 (792 x $16.08), and the group would have earned $178,295.04 (14 . . . They would have worked 2 shifts per week at $16.08 per hour. . . . Each would have received $8,490.24 (16 hours at $16.08 for 33 weeks). . . .

In GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS. FERNANDEZ DIAMANTE. In GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS. RAMOS, 814 F.2d 61 (1st Cir. 1987)

. . . Doe at 1275 (quoting 8 Moore’s Federal Practice § 16.08[1] at 16-100 (2d ed. 1970)). . . .

MECHMET, v. FOUR SEASONS HOTELS, LIMITED, a a d b a, 639 F. Supp. 330 (N.D. Ill. 1986)

. . . $18.93 $19.73 Captain or Hostess: Dinner $20.73 $21.73 $22.73 3 13.98 14.58 Lunch or Breakfast 15.33 16.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOMME, Jr., 753 F.2d 950 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 16.08 (West 1961). United States v. . . .

V. WHITFIELD, v. LEAR,, 582 F. Supp. 1186 (E.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . Nimmer on Copyright, § 16.08[B], at 16-63 n. 58. . . .

MORGAN STANLEY CO. INCORPORATED, v. ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY,, 570 F. Supp. 1529 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . ADM raised money through public borrowing at interest rates less than 16.08% on at least two occasions . . . The Zeroes bore an effective interest rate of less than 16.08%. . . . The Stars carry an effective interest rate of less than 16.08%. . . . terms of the Indenture to call the Debentures when it was borrowing funds at an interest rate less than 16.08% . . . [is] less than 16.08% per annum.” . . .

In SONOMA V, a SONOMA V, v. SELLS,, 703 F.2d 429 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice 16.08, at 1500.74 & n. 9; 4 C. Wright & A. . . .

FULK, v. STATE, 417 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . IV, section 4(c) and article V, section 17, Florida Constitution, and section 16.01(4)(5) and (6), 16.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WOODS, Jr., 544 F.2d 242 (6th Cir. 1976)

. . . prospective defendant’ by Fifth Amendment immunity, [citations omitted].” 8 Moore’s Federal Practice fl 16.08 . . .

SAFFIOTI, v. WILSON,, 392 F. Supp. 1335 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)

. . . Sands, Sutherland’s Statutory Construction § 16.08 at 443-46 (4 ed. 1972). . . . .

E. I. DuPONT NEMOURS AND COMPANY, v. YOSHIDA INTERNATIONAL, INC. K. K., 393 F. Supp. 502 (E.D.N.Y. 1975)

. . . This would also appear to increase the likelihood of confusion, Seidel, supra, § 16.08 [3]. . . .

In SOUTHWEST AREA RATE CASE OSWA I SHELL OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 484 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . Texas District 5 1.9 13.91 12.27-17.64 1.0 18.50 18.50 9.9 21.80 18.00-27.45 Texas District 6 1.6 17.14 16.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIGURELL,, 462 F.2d 1080 (3d Cir. 1972)

. . . omitting to perform an act are set forth in Devitt and Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 16.08 . . .

D. AUSTIN C. v. UNITED STATES, 461 F.2d 733 (10th Cir. 1972)

. . . .) § 16.08, p. 1667d. . . .

A. HARRIS, v. MANUFACTURERS NATIONAL BANK OF DETROIT, a, 457 F.2d 631 (6th Cir. 1972)

. . . Rasmussen, 184 F.Supp. 351 (D.Minn. 1960) ; Collier, supra, Vol. 1A, Para. 16.08, at 1536-37. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LANZA,, 341 F. Supp. 405 (M.D. Fla. 1972)

. . . . § 16.08, F.S.A. . . .

ESSO INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. SS CAPTAIN JOHN,, 443 F.2d 1144 (5th Cir. 1971)

. . . See also 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ff 16.02, 16.08 (14th ed. 1970). . . .

JONES v. G. TANZLER, Jr., 238 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 1970)

. . . See McQuillin, Municipal Corporation, Vol. 5, Sec. 16.08. . . .

SYNTEX LABORATORIES, INC. v. NORWICH PHARMACAL COMPANY,, 315 F. Supp. 45 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . Gonda, Trademark Law and Practice¶16.08 at 424 (1963). . . .

CORUM v. UNITED STATES A. R. WHITTINGTON v. UNITED STATES, 268 F. Supp. 109 (W.D. Ky. 1967)

. . . through every year of its existence.” 2 Rabkin & Johnson, Federal Income, Gift and Estate Taxation § 16.08 . . . normal circumstances it will do so. 2 Rabkin & Johnson, Federal Income, Gift and Estate Taxation § 16.08 . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, W. S. H. L. H. L. Jr. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, R. W. A. M. H. D. MPS LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, R. W. A. M. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 373 F.2d 816 (D.C. Cir. 1967)

. . . .-59 cents, produces an in-line price of 16.08 cents per Mcf. . . .

WILLIAMSON v. SOLOMON, 109 F. Supp. 663 (E.D.N.C. 1953)

. . . In 1943 the percentage was 2.56 percent; in 1949, 16.08 percent; in 1950, 20 percent. . . .

In VICKSBURG BRIDGE TERMINAL CO., 29 F. Supp. 225 (S.D. Miss. 1938)

. . . amounting to $37.73, and for two similar lists of 557 depositors in the sum of $33.42, be reduced to $16.08 . . .

MASSACHUSETTS MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. JONES, 44 F.2d 540 (4th Cir. 1930)

. . . The' difference was $16.08, which was not sufficient to pay another quarterly premium, and this amount . . .