Cases from cite.case.law:

BROOKS v. WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF FLORIDA, INC. a a, 706 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Id. at 4 (citing MeQuillin, supra, § 16.54). . . .

G. GEDDES B. H. v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY,, 881 F. Supp. 94 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . 44.22% ($470,987.22) JAMES GEDDES (son) 5/23/74 12 8.51 11% ($117,161.00) PHILIP GEDDES (son) 6/1/82 16.54 . . .

QUILTER, v. V. VOINOVICH,, 794 F. Supp. 695 (N.D. Ohio 1992)

. . . Montgomery 5.24 573,809 101,817 17.7 2 571,697 94,561 16.54 1-1 5. . . .

GEHMAN, v. GRAVIS,, 39 Fla. Supp. 2d 126 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . For 1985 the average monthly charge is ($194.22+ $4.20)/12 months or $16.54 a month. . . .

In HAYWARD,, 74 B.R. 392 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1987)

. . . loan in the amount of $27,303.00 to be repaid in 120 installments of $466.50 and at a fixed rate of 16.54% . . . the amount of debt, interest and costs with a subsequent resale and a handsome profit enriching the 16.54% . . .

WOODLAND NURSING HOME CORPORATION, v. R. HARRIS, v. WOODLAND NURSING HOME ASSOCIATES d b a, 514 F. Supp. 110 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Woodland claimed that it was entitled to $16.54 per day more for medicare patient services than for non-medicare . . .

HOUSTON LIGHTING POWER COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. v. UNITED STATES Fe Ry. Co., 606 F.2d 1131 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

. . . rate of $15.60 per net ton, subject to an annual escalation provision, and an alternative rate of $16.54 . . . it rejected the escalation formula to which the $15.60 rate was attached, as well as the proposed $16.54 . . . The Commission rejected, however, a rate of $16.54 as exceeding a maximum reasonable level. . . . In this very case, the Commission did put limits on some proposed rates, rejecting the $16.54 rate proposal . . . to establish the capital incentive rate schedule when it had found portions of that schedule — the $16.54 . . .

CITY OF EASTLAKE v. FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC., 426 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1976)

. . . McQuillan, Municipal Corporations §16.54, p. 208 (3d ed., 1969). . . .

WOODLAND NURSING HOME CORPORATION, v. W. WEINBERGER, v. WOODLAND NURSING HOME ASSOCIATES d b a, 411 F. Supp. 501 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)

. . . of the two allowable methods under 20 C.F.R. 405.452(a) — Woodland claimed that it was entitled to $16.54 . . .

ANDOVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, 328 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . See McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, 3rd Ed. pp. 251, 252, Sec. 16.54; * * *’” The District Court of . . .

CITY OF CORAL GABLES, a v. G. CARMICHAEL, Jr., 256 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . See McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, 3rd Ed. pp. 251, 252, Sec. 16.54; * * *” Although in the above . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSON B., 301 F. Supp. 1161 (S.D. Miss. 1969)

. . . From 1960 to 1965 Greenwood had an increase of 12.55% compared to 16.54% for the 18 cities as a whole . . .

SASKATCHEWAN MINERALS, SODIUM SULPHATE DIVISION v. UNITED STATES, 253 F. Supp. 504 (W.D. Wash. 1965)

. . . Truck delivery to customer.............. .93 1.86 $13.81 $16.54 An upward adjusted Trona rail rate would . . .

E. SCOTT, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, a, 173 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . In 5 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations,, § 16.54 (3d ed. 1949) it is stated: “The power of initiative . . . See McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, 3rd Ed. pp. 251, 252, Sec. 16.54; compare Spencer v. . . .

CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY E. Jr. Co- E. v. UNITED STATES HERRLINGER, R. Jr. J. v. UNITED STATES CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY, R. v. UNITED STATES, 305 F.2d 393 (Ct. Cl. 1962)

. . . the fair market values of the Heekin stock as of August 3 and October 25, 1954, would be $16.67 and $16.54 . . . Heekin on August 3, 1954 and $16.54 a share on the 40,002 shares given by James J. . . .

THE CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY AND ALBERT E. HEEKIN, JR. CO- EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT E. HEEKIN, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES KATHARINE HEEKIN HERRLINGER, JAMES R. HEEKIN, JR. AND THE CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTORS UNDER THE WILL OF JAMES J. HEEKIN, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES THE CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY, SUCCESSOR EXECUTOR AND TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF ALMA R. HEEKIN, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES, 158 Ct. Cl. 504 (Ct. Cl. 1962)

. . . the fair market values of the Heekin stock as of August 3 and October 25, 1954, would be $16.67 and $16.54 . . . Heekin on August 3, 1954 and $16.54 a share on the 40,002 shares given by James J. . . .

PREZIOSO, v. S. FLEMMING,, 180 F. Supp. 784 (E.D.N.Y. 1960)

. . . guardian, made application for and received on plaintiff’s behalf child’s benefits in the amount of $16.54 . . .

v., 33 T.C. 1 (T.C. 1959)

. . . On January 5, 1954, the final installment of $16.54 per share was received. . . .

STERN, v. STERN,, 75 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1954)

. . . Schouler, Domestic Relations, 6th ed., Vol. 2, Sec. 1859; Nelson on Divorce, 2d ed., Vol. 2, Sec. 16.54 . . .