Florida Statute 16.54 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 16.54

16.54 Florida Crime Prevention Training Institute; revolving trust fund.—

(1) There is created within the Department of Legal Affairs the Florida Crime Prevention Training Institute, which shall be a comprehensive program of crime prevention training courses suitable for, and made available to, any interested person.

(2) The department shall establish the curriculum and admission requirements in such a manner as to give priority to those training programs which it determines to have the greatest potential for preventing crime. The department shall provide administrative support services for the institute. The department shall adopt rules and policies for the administration and operation of the institute and fix admission fees in an amount which, in the aggregate, does not exceed the cost of the program; and it may accept donations or grants of any type for any function or purpose of the institute.

(3) There is established within the Department of Legal Affairs the Florida Crime Prevention Training Institute Revolving Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the purposes of this section.

(4) All moneys, fees, donations, or grants collected by the department on behalf of the institute shall be deposited into the Florida Crime Prevention Training Institute Revolving Trust Fund and shall be applied to cover all costs incurred in establishing and conducting the crime prevention training programs authorized under this section, including, but not limited to, salaries for instructors and costs of materials connected with such programs.

History.—s. 1, ch. 82-89; s. 4, ch. 83-217.

F.S. 16.54 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.54 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.54

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.54

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.54.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 16.54

Total Results: 8

Brooks v. WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-02-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 706 So. 2d 85

Snippet: provisions. Id. at 4 (citing McQuillin, supra, § 16.54). In the section quoted in Barnes, McQuillin does

Andover Develop. Corp. v. City of New Smyrna Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-02-09T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 328 So. 2d 231

Snippet: Municipal Corporations, 3rd Ed. pp. 251, 252, Sec. 16.54; * * *'" The District Court of Appeal,

Rodgers v. WT Grant Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-06-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 326 So. 2d 57

Snippet: 865; Harper and James, op. cit. at § 4.5, pp. 315-16, 54 C.J.S. Malicious Prosecution § 37 at pp. 999 et

City of Coral Gables v. Carmichael

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-01-12T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 256 So. 2d 404

Snippet: Municipal Corporations, 3rd Ed. pp. 251, 252, Sec. 16.54; * * *" Although in the above statement in

Scott v. City of Orlando

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-04-01T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 173 So. 2d 501

Snippet: quot; In 5 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, § 16.54 (3d ed. 1949) it is stated: "The power of initiative…Municipal Corporations, 3rd Ed. pp. 251, 252, Sec. 16.54; compare Spencer v. City of Alhambra, 44 Cal. App

Stern v. Stern

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-11-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 75 So. 2d 810, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1852

Snippet: . 1859; Nelson on Divorce, 2d ed., Vol. 2, Sec. 16.54; Ring v. Ring, 185 Va. 269, 38 S.E.2d 471, 165 A.L.R

Ireland v. Terwilliger

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1951-08-21T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 54 So. 2d 52

Snippet: 5793, as set forth in Lansing v. Haynes, 95 Mich. 16, 54 N.W. 699, 700, in which it was held that divorce

Barnes v. City of Miami

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1950-06-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 47 So. 2d 3

Snippet: Municipal Corporations, 3rd Ed. pp. 251, 252, Sec. 16.54; compare Spencer v. City of Alhambra, 44 Cal. App