The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 16.62

16.62 Recognition and awards.—In addition to expenditures separately authorized by law, the Department of Legal Affairs may expend no more than $20,000 annually to support costs associated with the Law Enforcement Officer of the Year Recognition and Awards Program and the Victims Services Recognition and Awards Program.

History.—s. 2, ch. 2015-92.

F.S. 16.62 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.62 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.62

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.62

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.62.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

NATIONAL NAIL CORP. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1356 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)

. . . exclusive of its affiliates) was found to be eligible for a separate rate and was assigned the rate of 16.62 . . .

SEB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AB, On v. ENDO INTERNATIONAL, PLC, V. T. W. De P. G. H. P. A. H. M. J. J. P. D. F., 351 F. Supp. 3d 874 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . In response, the price of Endo common stock dropped 16.62% to close at $11.49 per share the next day. . . .

NATIONAL NAIL CORP. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 279 F. Supp. 3d 1372 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . Commerce Apr. 8, 2015) (final results of the fifth annual review in which Shandong was assigned a rate of 16.62 . . .

SUNTEC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 857 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . Reg. 18,816, 18,817 (Dep't of Commerce Apr. 8, 2015) (assigning Suntec 16.62 percent rate). . . . .

P. GLUNK, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE Jr. M. D. A., 687 F. App'x 196 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . Code § 16.62, on the ground that he had attempted to influence a Board member. . . .

CMC TELECOM, INC. v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO., 654 F. Supp. 2d 677 (W.D. Mich. 2009)

. . . The wholesale rate discount from Defendant AT & T Michigan’s tariffed services is 16.62%. . . . At the time the suit was filed, the wholesale rate for CLECs in Michigan was 16.62% off the retail rate . . . of the ICB retail prices for its telecommunications services are discounted at a rate greater than 16.62% . . . Defendant’s ICB contracts may offer their noncarrier subscribers certain services at rates lower than the 16.62% . . .

In CERIDIAN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 504 F. Supp. 2d 603 (D. Minn. 2007)

. . . Eickhoff traded nearly 100.000 shares of Ceridian stock in two trades when the stock was trading at $16.62 . . .

In NANOVATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v., 364 B.R. 308 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . stock was $17.52 in the Canadian exchange and $15.72 over the counter in the United States, averaging $16.62 . . .

BINGHAM, v. CNA FINANCIAL CORP., 408 F. Supp. 2d 563 (N.D. Ill. 2005)

. . . also dated September 18, 2003, stating that she was eligible for $19,571.71 in severance, equal to 16.62 . . .

W. CLEARY, v. De CLEARY, a k a M., 872 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . court concluded that the Husband was required to pay the Wife $42,664.44, plus per diem interest of $16.62 . . .

PURINA MILLS, L. L. C. v. LESS, 295 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (N.D. Iowa 2003)

. . . A contract price of $35.00, minus the asserted market price of $18.38 yields a difference of $16.62. . . . This difference of $16.62 times 76,250 — the number of weanling pigs that Purina alleges the Lesses were . . . Multiplying 73,429 by the contract/market differential of $16.62 would yield damages in the amount of . . . damages, Purina would receive the $3.00 profit per weanling pig, the contract/market differential of $16.62 . . . Contracpmarket damages of $16.62 per weanling pig would amount to close to $1.3 million, about four times . . .

RYAN, v. GENERAL MACHINE PRODUCTS,, 277 F. Supp. 2d 585 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . Dixon’s starting pay in January 1996 was $16.62 per hour, and increased to $17.12 per hour in May 1996 . . .

UNITED STATES v. REYES,, 934 F. Supp. 553 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . QNs Thrown Away Made up of Made up of in County [3] Blacks Blacks New York 11,872 4,482 3,562 16.62% . . . QNs Thrown Away Made up of Made up of in County [3] Blacks Blacks New York 11,872 4,482 2,374 16.62% . . . QNs Thrown Away Made up of Made up of in County [3] Blacks Blacks New York 11,872 4,482 1,187 16.62% . . . QNs Made up of Blacks New York 11,872 4,482 0 16.62% 25.10% Bronx 7,166 2,876 0 33.55% 38.77% Westchester . . .

DeBARTOLO- AVENTURA, INC. d b a d b a v. HERNANDEZ,, 638 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . .); accord The Florida Bar, Florida Civil Practice Before Trial § 16.62, at 16-55 (5th ed. 1993) (“Once . . .

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, v. UNITED STATES, 788 F. Supp. 1267 (D. Mass. 1992)

. . . The initial official error rate was 16.36 percent on November 8, 1984; 16.62 percent on November 21, . . .

C. v., 86 T.C. 14 (T.C. 1986)

. . . This contract contained a penalty clause, wherein Price Ltd. agreed to pay the Crocis a penalty of $16.62 . . . , if no coal was mined under the contract, the total penalty due was $29,916, computed as follows: $16.62 . . . Spiller a penalty of $16.62 per day, computed on the basis of a 360-day year, for each day that it did . . . , if no coal was mined under the contract, the total penalty due was $29,916, computed as follows: $16.62 . . .

L. E. v., 51 T.C. 746 (T.C. 1969)

. . . The petitioner paid personal property tax assessed against this property of $16.62 in 1964 and $16.95 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN, H. R. R. H., 281 F. Supp. 31 (E.D. La. 1968)

. . . Non-whites comprised 16.62% of the 4,759 persons who were sent questionnaires prior to the drawing of . . . While nonwhites comprised only 16.62% of those who received questionnaires, they comprised 27.59% of . . .

F. Jr. v., 46 T.C. 461 (T.C. 1966)

. . . of Liberty Glass Company, a corporation; and the First Party warrants * * * that such shares equal 16.62% . . . The 26,592 shares of Liberty common stock transferred by petitioner to Beverley constituted 16.62 percent . . .

STRACHAN SHIPPING COMPANY, v. MELVIN, 327 F.2d 83 (5th Cir. 1964)

. . . There, the employee was drowned on the job and his children were awarded $16.62 per week under the Longshoreman . . .

VINCENT, Jr. v. SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY,, 178 F. Supp. 276 (W.D. La. 1959)

. . . Zalan Vincent to The Texas Company, dated June 25, 1928, in which she received a consideration of $16.62 . . . Zalan Vincent to The Texas Company, dated June 25, 1927, in which she received a consideration of $16.62 . . .

VORIS v. GULF- TIDE STEVEDORES,, 211 F.2d 549 (5th Cir. 1954)

. . . entitled to $18.37 per week until her death or remarriage, and the children jointly became entitled to $16.62 . . .