Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 17.076 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 17.076 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 17.076

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.076
17.076 Direct deposit of funds.
(1) As used in this section, the term “beneficiary” means any person who is drawing salary or retirement benefits from the state or who is the recipient of any lawful payment from state funds.
(2) The Chief Financial Officer shall establish a program for the direct deposit of funds to the account of the beneficiary of such a payment or disbursement in any financial institution equipped for electronic fund transfers, which institution is designated in writing by such beneficiary and has lawful authority to accept such deposits. Direct deposit of funds shall be by any electronic or other transfer medium approved by the Chief Financial Officer for such purpose.
(3) The Chief Financial Officer may contract with an authorized financial institution for the services necessary to operate the program. In order to implement the provisions of this section, the Chief Financial Officer may deposit with that financial institution the funds payable to the beneficiaries, in lump sum, by Chief Financial Officer’s warrant to make the authorized direct deposits.
(4) The written authorization of a beneficiary shall be filed with the department or its designee. Such authorization shall remain in effect until withdrawn in writing by the beneficiary or dishonored by the designated financial institution.
(5) All direct deposit records made prior to October 1, 1986, are exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1). With respect to direct deposit records made on or after October 1, 1986, the names of the authorized financial institutions and the account numbers of the beneficiaries are confidential and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. Notwithstanding this exemption and the provisions of s. 119.071(5)(b), the department may provide a state university, upon request, with that university’s employee or vendor direct deposit authorization information on file with the department in order to accommodate the transition to the university accounting system. The state university shall maintain the confidentiality of all such information provided by the department.
(6) To cover the department’s actual costs for processing the direct deposit of funds other than salary or retirement benefits, the department may charge the beneficiary of the direct deposit a reasonable fee. The department may collect the fee by direct receipt from the beneficiary or by subtracting the amount of the fee from the funds due the beneficiary. Such fees collected by the department shall be deposited into the Department of Financial Services Administrative Trust Fund.
(7) All new recipients of retirement benefits from this state shall be paid by direct deposit of funds. A retiree may request from the department an exemption from the provisions of this subsection when such retiree can demonstrate a hardship. The department may pay retirement benefits by state warrant when deemed administratively necessary.
History.s. 2, ch. 81-277; s. 1, ch. 83-120; s. 3, ch. 83-132; s. 1, ch. 86-64; s. 2, ch. 90-360; s. 3, ch. 95-312; s. 4, ch. 96-406; s. 2, ch. 99-155; s. 24, ch. 2003-261; ss. 5, 6, ch. 2003-399; s. 1, ch. 2004-41; s. 1, ch. 2006-1; s. 2, ch. 2019-3.

F.S. 17.076 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.076 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.076


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.076
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.076.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.076

Total Results: 9

Fuller v. Sandler N/K/A Kempler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-18

Snippet: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 18, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-76 Lower Tribunal No. 12-15364 ________________ Joshua Luther Fuller, Appellant,

Marvin Cooper v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-01

Snippet: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MARVIN COOPER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D17-0076 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ___________________________/ Opinion filed May

and SC14-1952 Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida and Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-21

Citation: 191 So. 3d 370

Snippet: of justice in every American court.” *376Id. at 17, 76 S.Ct. 585 (quoting Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S

Gill v. McGuire

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-02-06

Citation: 806 So. 2d 629, 2002 WL 181138

Snippet: court entered a judgment in McGuire's favor for $17,076.31. Because Gill had not accepted McGuire's pre-trial

Stanley v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-12-29

Citation: 425 So. 2d 608

Snippet: also 3 Minzer et al., supra note 1, § 17.23 at pp. 17-76, 77: The collateral source rule generally permits

Mt. Sinai Medical Center v. Lack

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-03-17

Citation: 381 So. 2d 304

Snippet: after 8/25/75, claimant worked full-time until 3/17/76, when she ceased working altogether. On 4/20/76

Parker v. Blaine

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-02-26

Citation: 172 So. 2d 268

Snippet: St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Hill, 1934, 336 Mo. 17, 76 S.W.2d 685. In the following cases a testator devised

In Re Baker's Estate

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-02-26

Citation: 172 So. 2d 268

Snippet: St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Hill, 1934, 336 Mo. 17, 76 S.W.2d 685. In the following cases a testator devised

T. & C. Corp. v. Eikenberry

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-01-05

Citation: 178 So. 137, 130 Fla. 509, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1306

Snippet: the above mentioned tax sale certificate being $17.76. "10. Your complainant would further show unto the