Florida Statute 20.11 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 20
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 20.11

20.11 Department of Legal Affairs.—There is created a Department of Legal Affairs. The head of the Department of Legal Affairs is the Attorney General.

History.—s. 11, ch. 69-106; ss. 1, 2, ch. 77-105.

F.S. 20.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 20.11 on CourtListener

Amendments to 20.11

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 20.11

Total Results: 22

Swift Textiles, Inc. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

799 F.2d 697, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 29861

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 15, 1986 | Docket: 179898

Cited 51 times | Published

Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11707, formerly 49 U.S.C. § 20(11). Among other things, the Carmack Amendment (amending

Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc. v. Bowman Transportation, Inc.

901 F.2d 1034, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8158, 1990 WL 57350

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 1990 | Docket: 258995

Cited 34 times | Published

Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11707 (formerly 49 U.S.C. § 20(11)). On appeal, Bowman does not dispute that the

Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc. v. Bowman Transportation, Inc.

698 F. Supp. 1566, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12500, 1988 WL 119977

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1988 | Docket: 2257030

Cited 14 times | Published

Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11707, formerly 49 U.S.C. App. § 20(11). Defendant maintains that its tariff excludes

Miller v. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc.

447 F. Supp. 1201, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19467

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1978 | Docket: 1187464

Cited 14 times | Published

Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11) plaintiff Judith A. Miller seeks recovery from

Hoagland v. Railway Express Agency

75 So. 2d 822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1954 | Docket: 474823

Cited 11 times | Published

goods in interstate commerce, Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 20(11), has pre-empted this field and supersedes all

Smith v. Willis

415 So. 2d 1331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1982 | Docket: 459135

Cited 6 times | Published

contradictions. K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.11 at 279-80 (1982 Supp.). The circuit court did not

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Chase & Co.

146 So. 658, 109 Fla. 50

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1933 | Docket: 3273403

Cited 6 times | Published

28, 1920, 91 Stats. 491, 49 U.S. Code Ann. Section 20 [11] Interstate Commerce Act), and is valid and

Roadway Express, Inc. v. Fuente Cigar, Ltd.

749 F. Supp. 248, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14094, 1990 WL 156545

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1990 | Docket: 1182963

Cited 3 times | Published

Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11707(a)(1), formerly 49 U.S.C. § 20(11).[4] To establish a prima facie case under the

ST. v. Falls Chase Spec. Taxing Dist.

424 So. 2d 787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1983 | Docket: 1297053

Cited 3 times | Published

principle. K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.11 at 279-80 (1982 Supp.): Since 1975 the [federal]

Miller v. AAACon Auto Transport, Inc.

434 F. Supp. 40, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15152

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1977 | Docket: 1609088

Cited 3 times | Published

2011 of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11). Additionally, the court found that the clause

Emery Air Freight v. Cornil

414 So. 2d 1167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1982 | Docket: 1707254

Cited 2 times | Published

Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20 (11), was recodified without substantive change at

Horowitch v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.

526 F. Supp. 2d 1236, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68453, 2007 WL 2714094

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 2007 | Docket: 804110

Cited 1 times | Published

see also 9A Ariz. Prac., Business Law Deskbook § 20:11 (2006-2007). "It is not necessary to show a specific

Martin v. E. A. McCabe & Co.

113 So. 2d 879, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1959 | Docket: 60193072

Cited 1 times | Published

case is controlled by federal law (49 U.S.C.A. § 20(11,12)). Thereunder, a carrier is not an insurer against

Lopez and Sardinas v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2016 | Docket: 4544299

Published

action provision of this Section 20. 11 Thus, but for the bank’s

Admiral Cruise Services, Inc. v. M/V ST. TROPEZ

524 F. Supp. 2d 1378, 2008 A.M.C. 661, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92488, 2007 WL 4324817

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2007 | Docket: 2314654

Published

persuasive. See also Robert Force, The Law of Seamen at § 20:11 (5th Ed.2007); Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 29, 1977 | Docket: 3257385

Published

appropriated. Within that opinion, I noted: Section 20.11(3), F. S. [transferred and renumbered s. 16

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 19, 1975 | Docket: 3258708

Published

immunity provided in ss. 768.28-768.30, F.S. Section 20.11(3), F.S., provides that the Department of Legal

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 23, 1974 | Docket: 3255818

Published

agencies, such board may retain private counsel. Section 20.11(3), F.S. AS TO QUESTION 1: Research reveals

Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. v. Megna

285 So. 2d 44, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1973 | Docket: 64535469

Published

interstate carrier who becomes liable under Section 20(11) of the Interstate Commerce Act for damage to

Winter Garden Citrus Products Cooperative v. Tavares & Gulf Railroad

248 So. 2d 200, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6484

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1971 | Docket: 64520465

Published

terms of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11) (1970). Thus, I could envision under normal circumstances

Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Brinke

316 F. Supp. 1402, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10479

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1970 | Docket: 66064177

Published

arises under the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11), commonly referred to as The Carmack Amendment

Castellano v. Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc.

225 So. 2d 439, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1969 | Docket: 64510765

Published

stems from the following theory: (a) 49 U.S.C.A. § 20(11) is the controlling section of the Interstate Commerce