Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 22.02 (2025)
Declaration of policy.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
22.02 Declaration of policy.—Because of the existing possibility of attack upon the United States of unprecedented size and destructiveness, and in order, in the event of such an attack, to assure continuity of government through legally constituted leadership, authority and responsibility in offices of the government of the state and its political subdivisions; to provide for the effective operation of governments during an emergency; and to facilitate the early resumption of functions temporarily suspended, it is found and declared to be necessary to provide for additional officers who can exercise the powers and discharge the duties of Governor; to provide for emergency interim succession to governmental offices of its political subdivisions, in the event the incumbents thereof are unavailable to perform the duties and functions of such offices.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1975–2009 · leading case: Husky Rose, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 19 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Husky Rose, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 19 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). “More applicable to these facts is section 22.02 of the lease which prohibits oral agreements to modify its terms.”
Fla. Med. Ass'n v. Dept. of Prof. Reg., 426 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). “Support for this view is borne out by Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 22.02-11 (1982 Supp.), "The `Zone' Test," page 347: "Is the `zone' test the law? The best answer is: Sometimes it is but most of the time it is not, and a criterion for determining when it is the law is…”
Vieira v. Slaughter, 318 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). “Section 22.02. Effective Date of Charter.”
Flexiteek Americas, Inc. v. Plasteak, Inc., 626 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (S.D. Fla. 2009). “Chisum, Patents § 22.02 (1990)). Patents have the attributes of personal property and both patents and applications for patents are assignable.”
Tillman v. State, 934 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 2006). “§ 22.02 (Vernon 2003 & Supp.2005); Del.Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.