Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 22.15 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 22.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 22.15 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 22.15

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 22
EMERGENCY CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 22.15
22.15 Seat of government; emergency temporary location.
(1) Whenever, due to an emergency resulting from the effects of enemy attack, or the anticipated effects of a threatened enemy attack, it becomes imprudent, inexpedient, or impossible to conduct the affairs of state government at the normal location of the seat thereof in the City of Tallahassee, Leon County, the Governor shall, as often as the exigencies of the situation require, by proclamation, declare an emergency temporary location, or locations, for the seat of government at such place, or places, within or without this state as he or she may deem advisable under the circumstances, and shall take such action and issue such orders as may be necessary for an orderly transition of the affairs of state government to such emergency temporary location, or locations. Such emergency temporary location, or locations, shall remain as the seat of government until the Legislature shall by law establish a new location, or locations, or until the emergency is declared to be ended by the Governor and the seat of government is returned to its normal location.
(2) During such time as the seat of government remains at such emergency temporary location, or locations, all official acts now or hereafter required by law to be performed at the seat of government by any officer, agency, department or authority of this state, including the convening and meeting of the Legislature in regular, extraordinary or emergency session, shall be as valid and binding when performed at such emergency temporary location, or locations, as if performed at the normal location of the seat of government.
(3) The provisions of this section shall control and be supreme in the event it shall be employed notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary or in conflict herewith.
History.ss. 1, 2, 3, ch. 59-498; s. 86, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 22.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 22.15 on CourtListener

Amendments to 22.15


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 22.15

Total Results: 8

Th v. Department of Children & Fam.

736 So. 2d 126, 1999 WL 436561

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1999 | Docket: 1736499

Cited 4 times | Published

PHILIP J. PADOVANO, FLORIDA APPELLATE PRACTICE § 22.15, at 429 (2d ed.1997). After the lower tribunal

McGuire v. McGuire

42 So. 3d 932, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12537, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2010 | Docket: 1148844

Cited 1 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 22.15, at 429 (2d ed. 1997). Because the appealed order

Adams v. Adams

126 So. 3d 250, 2006 WL 1628048, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2006 | Docket: 60236348

Cited 1 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 22.15, at 463-466 (2006); 3 Fla. Jur.2d Appellate Revieiv

Seminole Tribe v. Florida

49 F. Supp. 3d 1095, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124162, 2014 WL 4388143

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2014 | Docket: 64297483

Published

rights to anyone. (Am. & Restated Lease Agreement § 22.15, ECF Nos. 1-4 & 1-5.) Stranburg has not offered

Resnick v. Estate of Resnick

729 So. 2d 526, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4682, 1999 WL 212265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1999 | Docket: 64787187

Published

DCA), review denied, 515 So.2d 231 (Fla. 1987); § 22.15(1), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Buckley v. Commonwealth Mortgage Assurance Co. Service Co.

725 So. 2d 1146, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 1998 WL 770641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1998 | Docket: 64786019

Published

PHILIP J. PADAVANO, FLORIDA APPELLATE PRAC*1148TICE § 22.15, at 429 (2d ed.1997); see also Maryland Cas. Co

Coach House Restaurant, Inc. v. Coach & Six Restaurants, Inc.

934 F.2d 1549

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 11, 1991 | Docket: 66265077

Published

case in similar circumstances. . Lanham Act § 22, 15 U.S.C. § 1072 (1988). . Conagra, 743 F.2d at

Trak Microwave Corp. v. Medaris Management, Inc.

236 So. 2d 189, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1970 | Docket: 64514947

Published

inter-pleader action. 3A J. Moore, Federal Practice § 22. 15 (2d ed.1969). However, the form of action with