The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 25
SUPREME COURT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 25.375

25.375 Identification of related cases.—The Supreme Court may create a unique identifier for each person by which to identify all court cases related to that person or his or her family previously or currently in the court system. The unique identifier must be the same for that person in any court case. To create the unique identifier, the court may collect a portion of the person’s social security number or other personal identification information, such as the person’s date of birth. Failure to provide a social security number for this purpose may not be grounds to deny any services, rights, or remedies otherwise provided by law. To implement a unique identifier, the Supreme Court may require the revision of only those information technology systems that are directly operated and funded by the state court system.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-239.

F.S. 25.375 on Google Scholar

F.S. 25.375 on Casetext

Amendments to 25.375

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 25.375

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 25.375.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 194 So. 3d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The State advised the bottom of the guidelines was 25.375 years. . . . indicated that the difference between the two guidelines' calculations (twenty-four yéars in 2004 and 25.375 . . .

GONZALEZ, v. STATE, 156 So. 3d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . probation violation hearing, the State informed the trial court that the defendant’s scoresheet range was 25.375 . . .

MARINO v. GRUPO MUNDIAL TENEDORA, S. A. S. A. LLC, GPIM, 810 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . 27.5% interest that it had for voting; but Pali’s 72.5% interest was split among Pali (21.75%), Marino (25.375% . . . ), and Serpa (25.375%). . . .

In SPATZ, W. LEVIT, v. SPATZ,, 209 B.R. 907 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1997)

. . . interest in their Glencoe residence, a 28.375% limited partnership interest in Highland Park I and a 25.375% . . .

A. E. Co. v., 105 T.C. 166 (T.C. 1995)

. . . 37.875 Mar. 14 24.875 May 3 38.375 Mar. 15 24.625 May 4 38.375 Mar. 16 24.750 May 5 38.000 Mar. 17 25.375 . . . May 6 38.250 Mar. 18 25.750 May 9 38.750 Mar. 21 25.675 May 10 38.125 Mar. 22 25.375 May 11 37.125 Mar . . .