The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 27
STATE ATTORNEYS; PUBLIC DEFENDERS; RELATED OFFICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 27.13

27.13 Completion of compromise.—The state attorney shall, on agreeing to any compromise or settlement, report the same to the Department of Financial Services for its approval; and, on its approving such compromise or settlement, the state attorney, on a compliance with the terms of such compromise or settlement shall give a receipt to the collector of revenue, sheriff or other officer, or the sureties on their bonds, or to the legal representatives, which receipt shall be a discharge from all judgments, claims or demands of the state against such collector of revenue or other officer, or the sureties on their bonds.

History.—s. 2, ch. 3236, 1881; RS 1352; GS 1787; RGS 3017; CGL 4753; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 83, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 27.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 27.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 27.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 27.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 27.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MARTINEZ v. ANGEL EXPLORATION, LLC,, 798 F.3d 968 (10th Cir. 2015)

. . . Harper et al., Harper, James and Gray on Torts § 27.13, at 277 n. 29 (3d ed. 2008). . . . See Harper, supra, § 27.13, at 279 (“[T]he orthodox theory had become a pretty feeble reed for defendants . . .

IN RE BATE LAND TIMBER, LLC,, 523 B.R. 483 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . Comp # 7 was also a fisting (fisted in December 2013) for 25.77 usable acres (27.13 gross acres) in Pamlico . . .

In SCHNOOR, A. v., 510 B.R. 868 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2014)

. . . Therefore, she only paid 27.13% of the fair market value. . . . Common sense would likely lead almost anyone to believe that paying 27.13% of the fair market value is . . .

In BLUE PINE GROUP, INC., 448 B.R. 267 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2010)

. . . Jarvis, The Law of Lawyering § 27.13, at p. 27-27 (3d ed. 2008) (hereinafter, “Hazard, Hodes & Jarvis . . .

JACKSON, v. GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES,, 683 F. Supp. 2d 290 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . CPLR § 3102(c). . 6 Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13[2], . . . . E.g., In re Yamaha Motor Corp., 251 F.R.D. 97, 100 (S.D.N.Y.2008); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13 . . .

In J. MARTINEZ T., 393 B.R. 27 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2008)

. . . Jarvis, The Law of Lawyering § 27.13, at p. 27-27 (3d ed.2008) (hereinafter, “Hazard, Hodes & Jarvis” . . .

In YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U. S. A., 251 F.R.D. 97 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . (emphasis in original); Moore’s Federal Practice at ¶ 27.13[3]. . . . Practice at HH 27.12 (“[T]he petitioner must allege a specific risk that the evidence will be lost[J”) & 27.13 . . . In re Allegretti, 229 F.R.D. at 98; Moore’s Federal Practice at ¶ 27.13[4][a]-[d], No reason matching . . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 27.13[1] (3d ed 2008). . . .

In ASTON- NEVADA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 391 B.R. 84 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2006)

. . . WILLIAM Hodes, The Law of Lawyering § 27.13, at p. 27-27 (3d ed.2004). . . .

DUNN v. SANDOZ PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, 275 F. Supp. 2d 672 (M.D.N.C. 2003)

. . . . ¶¶ 27.13. Neither in his affidavit nor in his report, however, does Dr. . . .

E. CASUMPANG, Jr. v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN S AND WAREHOUSEMEN S UNION, LOCAL Jr., 269 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . Local 142 Constitution § 27.13 (1997). . . .

COMPLEX CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 165 F.3d 992 (D.C. Cir. 1999)

. . . looping and pipeline replacement. (6) Iroquois Phase II provides service to three customers, along with 27.13 . . .

In STORCK, J., 179 F.R.D. 57 (D. Mass. 1998)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, § 27.13 (2d ed.1993)). . . .

In PARKVIEW HOSPITAL, J. HUNTER, v. AMERISOURCE CORP., 213 B.R. 509 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1997)

. . . The average days between invoice and payment in 1994 was 31.44 days, with the shortest being 27.13 days . . .

In LLOYD S AMERICAN TRUST FUND LITIGATION, 954 F. Supp. 656 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . A, § 27.13(h)(1) (1995). . . .

In HEALTHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC. A. BRANDT, Jr. v. HICKS, MUSE CO. INCORPORATED,, 201 B.R. 19 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996)

. . . Queenan, Jr., Chapter 11 Theory and Practice § 27.13 (1994). . . .

In HOPSON MARINE TRANSPORTATION, INC., 168 F.R.D. 560 (E.D. La. 1996)

. . . Grotheer, Jr., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 27.13, at 27-35 (2d ed. 1987) (inspection and examination should . . .

MILLS, v. R. FREEMAN,, 942 F. Supp. 1449 (N.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . . %' Black Staff 37.46% 36.04% Range of All Schools 27.13-47.70% 29.88 — 47.62% 1994-1995 Elementary . . .

In LLOYD S AMERICAN TRUST FUND LITIGATION, 928 F. Supp. 333 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . A, § 27.13(h)(1) (1995). . . .

In BEST PRODUCTS CO. INC., 168 B.R. 35 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Hillinger, Chapter 11 Theory and Practice, § 27.13 at 27:35-27:37 (1994) (hereinafter “Queenan”). e. . . .

In THOMAS B., 155 F.R.D. 124 (D. Md. 1994)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13 (2d ed. 1993). See also Martin v. . . .

AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION AFL- CIO- CLC,, 939 F.2d 975 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

. . . The scrap lead prices in the same period fell from 27.13 cents/lbs to 6.38 cents/lbs, apparently to preserve . . .

EAST BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB COUNTY PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 706 F. Supp. 880 (M.D. Ga. 1989)

. . . See Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 4, particularly §§ 6.03, 23.14, 27.07, 27.12, 27.13, 27.14 and 27.15. . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 662 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . Section 27.13. Rehearing. . . .

SPORTMART, INC. v. FRISCH, RNC, USA, e C. S. A. S. S. A., 537 F. Supp. 1254 (N.D. Ill. 1982)

. . . See also 14 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 104.02[6] at 104-27.13 — 104-27.15 . . .

ANDRASKO v. CHAMBERLAIN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, 608 F.2d 944 (3d Cir. 1979)

. . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13, at 1492 (1956). . . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13, at 1496-97 (1956). . . .

NAPOLI, v. TRANSPACIFIC CARRIERS CORP. AND UNIVERSAL CARGO CARRIERS, INC. HELLENIC LINES, LTD., 536 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . See, e. g., 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts § 27.13, at 1489 et seq. (1956); W. . . .

D. WIGGINS, v. HESS,, 531 F.2d 920 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . Missouri Supreme Court Rule 27.13, 42 V.A. . . .

FARMHAND, INC. a v. S. BRANDIES, Jr. S. Sr., 327 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . cannot be safely encountered even with full, appreciation of the risk. 2 Harper and James, supra n. 4, § 27.13 . . .

E. FRASCA v. PRUDENTIAL- GRACE LINES, INC., 394 F. Supp. 1092 (D. Md. 1975)

. . . James, The Law of Torts, § 27.13, at 1489-98 (1956); Prosser § 61, at 394-95. . . .

ANUSZEWSKI v. DYNAMIC MARINERS CORP. PANAMA, 391 F. Supp. 1143 (D. Md. 1975)

. . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13 (1956)—an approach seemingly somewhat more advantageous to a plaintiff . . . Restatement or of Professor Prosser—to have been subjected to a “condition unreasonably dangerous” (§ 27.13 . . .

B C TIRE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES, 376 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ala. 1974)

. . . According to 4 Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13, there is. some question whether Buie 34-type discovery . . .

KELLEY, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF SOUTHWEST, v. L. CLARK, d b a, 485 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13 (1956). . . .

In SOUTHWEST AREA RATE CASE OSWA I SHELL OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 484 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . 19.50-21.45 Mississippi 1.0 20.96 20.96 _ Oklahoma 0.5 16.06 15.00-18.27 1.6 15.86 14.00-16.00 37.8 27.13 . . .

MORGAN, v. ARMOUR COMPANY, a, 425 F.2d 233 (9th Cir. 1970)

. . . have their attention distracted as they approach it * * *. 2 Harper and James, The Law of Torts, § 27.13 . . .

EISENHOWER, a k a Y. v. UNITED STATES, 216 F. Supp. 803 (E.D.N.Y. 1963)

. . . Restatement, Torts, § 343(c) (ii) (1934); but see 2 Harper and James, The Law of Torts, § 27.13 (1956 . . .

MARTIN v. REYNOLDS METALS CORPORATION,, 297 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1961)

. . . Sec. 27.13, p. 1829). . . .

BILTMORE TERRACE ASSOCIATES, v. KEGAN, a M. S. M. S., 130 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . See 2 Harper and James, Law of Torts, § 27.13. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JANNUZZIO, 184 F. Supp. 460 (D. Del. 1960)

. . . A.) “ “ 27.13 In April, 1952 defendants in conjunction with a third associate, Albert Marta, formed a . . .

PERLMAN, a v. E. TIMBERLAKE, 172 F. Supp. 246 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

. . . directly from J & L at its Pittsburgh office 2,500 shares of common stock under his option agreement at $27.13 . . . a share or at a cost to him for 1,800 shares of $48,834 ($27.13 represented a reduction in the option . . .

M. TISSUE Al E. v. VOLTA, 254 F.2d 88 (D.C. Cir. 1957)

. . . WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge, dissents. . 2 Harper and James, Torts §§ 27.13-27.17 (1956). . . .

MALONE FREIGHT LINES, v. UNITED STATES Co., 159 F. Supp. 952 (N.D. Ala. 1957)

. . . reflecting that the rates range from 34 cents to $1.20 per mile and that its average operating cost is 27.13 . . .