The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Harper et al., Harper, James and Gray on Torts § 27.13, at 277 n. 29 (3d ed. 2008). . . . See Harper, supra, § 27.13, at 279 (“[T]he orthodox theory had become a pretty feeble reed for defendants . . .
. . . Comp # 7 was also a fisting (fisted in December 2013) for 25.77 usable acres (27.13 gross acres) in Pamlico . . .
. . . Therefore, she only paid 27.13% of the fair market value. . . . Common sense would likely lead almost anyone to believe that paying 27.13% of the fair market value is . . .
. . . Jarvis, The Law of Lawyering § 27.13, at p. 27-27 (3d ed. 2008) (hereinafter, “Hazard, Hodes & Jarvis . . .
. . . CPLR § 3102(c). . 6 Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13[2], . . . . E.g., In re Yamaha Motor Corp., 251 F.R.D. 97, 100 (S.D.N.Y.2008); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13 . . .
. . . Jarvis, The Law of Lawyering § 27.13, at p. 27-27 (3d ed.2008) (hereinafter, “Hazard, Hodes & Jarvis” . . .
. . . (emphasis in original); Moore’s Federal Practice at ¶ 27.13[3]. . . . Practice at HH 27.12 (“[T]he petitioner must allege a specific risk that the evidence will be lost[J”) & 27.13 . . . In re Allegretti, 229 F.R.D. at 98; Moore’s Federal Practice at ¶ 27.13[4][a]-[d], No reason matching . . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 27.13[1] (3d ed 2008). . . .
. . . WILLIAM Hodes, The Law of Lawyering § 27.13, at p. 27-27 (3d ed.2004). . . .
. . . . ¶¶ 27.13. Neither in his affidavit nor in his report, however, does Dr. . . .
. . . Local 142 Constitution § 27.13 (1997). . . .
. . . looping and pipeline replacement. (6) Iroquois Phase II provides service to three customers, along with 27.13 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, § 27.13 (2d ed.1993)). . . .
. . . The average days between invoice and payment in 1994 was 31.44 days, with the shortest being 27.13 days . . .
. . . A, § 27.13(h)(1) (1995). . . .
. . . Queenan, Jr., Chapter 11 Theory and Practice § 27.13 (1994). . . .
. . . Grotheer, Jr., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 27.13, at 27-35 (2d ed. 1987) (inspection and examination should . . .
. . . . %' Black Staff 37.46% 36.04% Range of All Schools 27.13-47.70% 29.88 — 47.62% 1994-1995 Elementary . . .
. . . A, § 27.13(h)(1) (1995). . . .
. . . Hillinger, Chapter 11 Theory and Practice, § 27.13 at 27:35-27:37 (1994) (hereinafter “Queenan”). e. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13 (2d ed. 1993). See also Martin v. . . .
. . . The scrap lead prices in the same period fell from 27.13 cents/lbs to 6.38 cents/lbs, apparently to preserve . . .
. . . See Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 4, particularly §§ 6.03, 23.14, 27.07, 27.12, 27.13, 27.14 and 27.15. . . .
. . . Section 27.13. Rehearing. . . .
. . . See also 14 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 104.02[6] at 104-27.13 — 104-27.15 . . .
. . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13, at 1492 (1956). . . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13, at 1496-97 (1956). . . .
. . . See, e. g., 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts § 27.13, at 1489 et seq. (1956); W. . . .
. . . Missouri Supreme Court Rule 27.13, 42 V.A. . . .
. . . cannot be safely encountered even with full, appreciation of the risk. 2 Harper and James, supra n. 4, § 27.13 . . .
. . . James, The Law of Torts, § 27.13, at 1489-98 (1956); Prosser § 61, at 394-95. . . .
. . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13 (1956)—an approach seemingly somewhat more advantageous to a plaintiff . . . Restatement or of Professor Prosser—to have been subjected to a “condition unreasonably dangerous” (§ 27.13 . . .
. . . According to 4 Moore’s Federal Practice § 27.13, there is. some question whether Buie 34-type discovery . . .
. . . James, The Law of Torts § 27.13 (1956). . . .
. . . 19.50-21.45 Mississippi 1.0 20.96 20.96 _ Oklahoma 0.5 16.06 15.00-18.27 1.6 15.86 14.00-16.00 37.8 27.13 . . .
. . . have their attention distracted as they approach it * * *. 2 Harper and James, The Law of Torts, § 27.13 . . .
. . . Restatement, Torts, § 343(c) (ii) (1934); but see 2 Harper and James, The Law of Torts, § 27.13 (1956 . . .
. . . Sec. 27.13, p. 1829). . . .
. . . See 2 Harper and James, Law of Torts, § 27.13. . . .
. . . A.) “ “ 27.13 In April, 1952 defendants in conjunction with a third associate, Albert Marta, formed a . . .
. . . directly from J & L at its Pittsburgh office 2,500 shares of common stock under his option agreement at $27.13 . . . a share or at a cost to him for 1,800 shares of $48,834 ($27.13 represented a reduction in the option . . .
. . . WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge, dissents. . 2 Harper and James, Torts §§ 27.13-27.17 (1956). . . .
. . . reflecting that the rates range from 34 cents to $1.20 per mile and that its average operating cost is 27.13 . . .