Cases from cite.case.law:

ALFONSO- ROCHE, v. STATE, 199 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . defendants, the 15th Judicial Circuit had a mean prison sentence of 34.51 months, and a median sentence of 27.15 . . .

DISABILITY RIGHTS NEW JERSEY, INC. A v. COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 796 F.3d 293 (3d Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 30:4— 27.15(a); N.J. Ct. R. 4:74-7(c)(l). . . .

ZENERGY, INCORPORATED, v. PERFORMANCE DRILLING COMPANY, L. L. C., 603 F. App'x 289 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . hole was bring drilled at an angle of greater than seven and a half degrees under sections 4.4 and 27.15 . . . Section 27.15 states: “If directional or uncontrolled hole exceeds 7 1/2 degree deviation that will be . . .

OLSON, v. SHAWNEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,, 7 F. Supp. 3d 1162 (D. Kan. 2014)

. . . In 2009, Luttjohann was paid $27.15. In December of 2010, this increased to $27.80 per hour. . . .

WOOD, v. E. MAIN,, 789 F. Supp. 2d 519 (D.N.J. 2011)

. . . . § 30:4-27.15(a) which provides that “[i]f the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the . . . Ann. § 30:4-27.15(a). A. . . . Ann. § 30:4-27.15(a). . . . Ann. § 30:4-27.15(a). . . . Ann. § 30:4-27.15(a) from the “preponderance of the evidence” standard under Krol and N.J. Stat. . . .

C. UMPHREYVILLE, v. W. GITTINS,, 662 F. Supp. 2d 501 (W.D. Va. 2009)

. . . Smith, Legal Malpractice § 27.15, at 671-672 (1989)). . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY, v. L. STRICKLAND,, 604 F. Supp. 2d 805 (D.S.C. 2009)

. . . convention soybeans, acknowledged by the Federal Circuit, of 3 to 5 bushels/acre equates to $16.29 to $27.15 . . .

INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, v. CITY OF SAN LEANDRO,, 632 F. Supp. 2d 925 (N.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . Overlay, four are over 10 acres, eight are over 5 acres, and 24 are over 2 acres; the largest parcel is 27.15 . . .

CLARK, v. COMCAST CORP., 582 F. Supp. 2d 692 (E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . Then, on June 4, Burke sold 235,-792 shares at prices between $27 and $27.15, for $6.4 million. . . .

STATE v. BRALEY,, 832 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Braley faced was 27.15 months’ imprisonment. . . .

STATE v. A. GARCIA v., 774 So. 2d 21 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 27.15(2) expressly provides that in cases such as the one before us, when the State Attorney . . . responsibility for payment of the State Attorney’s prosecutorial expenses on the County, the language in section 27.15 . . .

TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE v. WHITMAN, G. U. S., 8 F. Supp. 2d 408 (D.N.J. 1998)

. . . See N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.12; N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.15; N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.17. . . . N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.15(c) provides: (1) The court may discharge the patient subject to conditions, if the . . . N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.15(c)(l) (emphasis added). . . . N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.15(e); N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.17(c). . . . N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.15(c)(2)-(3) . . . .

SEIDMAN v. AMERICAN MOBILE SYSTEMS,, 965 F. Supp. 612 (E.D. Pa. 1997)

. . . Collett 27.15 $2,186.25 Based upon the above chart, counsel claimed $70,640 in expenses for expert witness . . .

BOWMAN, v. GAMMON, W., 85 F.3d 1339 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . Rule 27.26 was repealed January 1, 1988, and was replaced by Rule 27.15. . . . .

E. WHITCHER v. TOWN OF MATTHEWS,, 136 F.R.D. 582 (W.D.N.C. 1991)

. . . Odom, Jr. has billed 27.15 hours at $80.00 an hour, and William H. . . .

GEISERMAN, v. H. A. B. A. B., 893 F.2d 787 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . Smith, Legal Malpractice § 27.15, at 667, 668-69 (“consequence of not producing expert testimony is the . . . Smith, Legal Malpractice § 27.15, at 671-72 (1989); Annotation, Admissibility and Necessity of Expert . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION, 896 F.2d 1264 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . conditional use permit, several property owners filed a state court certiorari petition, pursuant to section 27.15 . . . Section 27.15 is entitled "Appeals from decisions of commission." . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION, 888 F.2d 1573 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . conditional use permit, several property owners filed a state court certiorari petition, pursuant to section 27.15 . . . leading toward “just compensation” because they failed to use MaconBibb Land Development Resolution § 27.15 . . . Section 27.15 is entitled "Appeals from decisions of commission.” . . .

HUTCHISON, As Of A Of v. WELLS,, 719 F. Supp. 1435 (S.D. Ind. 1989)

. . . Korin’s work is: 27.15 hours X $75.00 per hour $2,036.25 Added to Mr. . . .

EAST BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB COUNTY PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 706 F. Supp. 880 (M.D. Ga. 1989)

. . . See Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 4, particularly §§ 6.03, 23.14, 27.07, 27.12, 27.13, 27.14 and 27.15. . . .

R. REID, Jr. v. WARDEN, CENTRAL PRISON, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA,, 708 F. Supp. 730 (W.D.N.C. 1989)

. . . At 2:30 p.m. a white female returned two gallons of paint to the Albemarle Road store, for $27.15 cash . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 662 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . property owners allegedly affected by the Board’s decision filed a petition for certio-rari, pursuant to § 27.15 . . . Section 27.15. Appeals from decisions of commission. . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 20.70 30.12 21.58 17.50 36.31 40.31 26.75 35.15 24.68 12.07 22.64 34.71 16.16 14.60 31.26 18.62 22.81 27.15 . . .

CORREA, v. M. HECKLER,, 587 F. Supp. 1216 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . by plaintiff's attorneys for each compensable phase of this case: First district court proceedings 27.15 . . .

SPORTMART, INC. v. FRISCH, RNC, USA, e C. S. A. S. S. A., 537 F. Supp. 1254 (N.D. Ill. 1982)

. . . See also 14 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 104.02[6] at 104-27.13 — 104-27.15 . . .

In ARTERBURN, ARTERBURN, v. ARTERBURN,, 15 B.R. 189 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1981)

. . . Read 1 Norton, Bankruptcy, § 27.15, p. 12. . . .

DICKERSON, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY a, 631 F.2d 99 (8th Cir. 1980)

. . . He requested that future monthly premiums of $27.15 be paid in advance under Equitable’s System-matic . . . The $20.35 ($47.50 less $27.15) overpayment would have represented about twenty days of coverage, computed . . .

UNITED STATES v. QUINTERO- MEDINA, 489 F. Supp. 82 (N.D. Ill. 1980)

. . . Mullen claims $4,012.50 for 1333/4 hours in court; $2,395.00 for 1193/4 hours out of court and $27.15 . . .

BUGHER v. SOUTHLAND FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC., 452 F. Supp. 870 (W.D. La. 1978)

. . . 27 8.10 13.50 Clarence Gray 10 ~_ 1.50 2,50 10 . 27 9.60 16.00 March. 1974: Tommy Jenkins 120 30.50 27.15 . . .

T. AUSTIN v. STATE T. CHRISTIAN,, 310 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1975)

. . . application of the governor showing good and sufficient cause to extend such exchange or assignment. “27.15 . . . District Court of Appeal in its opinion said: “[T]he Governor had the power and authority under F.S. 27.15 . . . Unquestionably, under Fla.Stat. § 27.15, F.S.A., the Governor could have ordered Austin to assist the . . . In summary, we hold that under the provisions of Fla.Stat. § 27.14 and § 27.15 (1973), F.S.A., the Governor . . .

STATE T. CHRISTIAN, v. T. AUSTIN, 302 So. 2d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . The pertinent statutes are Florida Statutes 27.14, 27.15 and 27.16. . . . (Emphasis added) “27.15 State attorneys to assist in other circuits.— (1) The governor of the state may . . . (F.S. 27.15) In assaying the legislative intent here, and the weight to be accorded that intent, the . . . In 1921 the Legislature enacted the predecessor to F.S. 27.15, viz., Ch. 8571, Acts of 1921, § 1, later . . . That Act, by using the phrase “discharge of any of the duties of such state attorney” in F.S. 27.15, . . .

UNITED STATES v. LANZA,, 341 F. Supp. 405 (M.D. Fla. 1972)

. . . duties of, or proceed to another circuit to assist, any other state attorney, Fla.Stat., §§ 27.14, 27.15 . . .

FINCH, v. W. L. FITZPATRICK,, 254 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1971)

. . . . § 27.15, F.S.A., ordered State Attorney Austin and his assistants “ * * * to assist the State Attorney . . . Fla.Stat. § 27.15, F.S.A., authorizing the Governor to assign state attorneys to assist in other circuits . . . The executive order of March 23, 1971, was issued under the authority of Fla.Stat. § 27.15, F.S.A. . . .

FEIT, v. LEASCO DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, 332 F. Supp. 544 (E.D.N.Y. 1971)

. . . was granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Leasco at 30% of the market price when granted — $27.15 . . .

CLARK v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT a Dr., 328 F. Supp. 1205 (E.D. Ark. 1971)

. . . the Pulaski County Special School District which engages in extensive busing of students was only $27.15 . . .

STANCEL, v. W. SCHULTZ,, 226 So. 2d 456 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 27.15, F.S.A., a prerequisite which admittedly did not exist here. . . .

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS, LOCAL v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,, 179 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . The complaint goes on to quote in part section 27.15 of the licensing ordinance stating that it shall . . .

ROSS v. UNITED STATES, 197 F.2d 660 (6th Cir. 1952)

. . . Delabar swore that he did not know that he had signed obligations to pay $977.32 at the rate of $27.15 . . .

INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO. v. DELAWARE H. R. CORPORATION, 73 F. Supp. 30 (N.D.N.Y. 1938)

. . . For a carload typical of those under consideration, 54,-300 lbs or 27.15 tons, the charge for the line . . . haul is $27.15 which, added to the switching charge, results in a total of $32.15. . . . Under defendant’s interpretation, the minimum revenue requisite for absorption for a carload of 27.15 . . . line-haul revenue plus the switching charge exceeded revenue of $22.65 prior to October 1, 1933 and $27.15 . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF JOHN M. BONNER MEMORIAL HOME, v. BRAWLEY, 86 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1936)

. . . The Brawley heirs claimed title to some 27.15 acres of the land by deed and adverse possession of 5 and . . . Gordon Simpson intervened, claiming a one-fourth interest. in a one-eighth retained royalty on this 27.15 . . . quieting the Brawley heirs, except two who had been dismissed from the suit, in their title to the 27.15 . . . bounded on the south and east by lands owned by John Hargraves; that the Brawley heirs claimed title to 27.15 . . . to the use and occupancy of the land by Hargraves, for the benefit ■of the Brawley heirs as to the 27.15 . . .

PERKINS v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA, 69 F.2d 218 (7th Cir. 1934)

. . . Appellant also contends that appellee did not make proper tender of the premiums, having offered only $27.15 . . .

v., 5 B.T.A. 934 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . During the year the petitioner purchased for the company a tent at a cost, with shipping charges, of $27.15 . . .

KINKEAD v. J. BACON SONS, 230 F. 362 (6th Cir. 1916)

. . . the entire of that commission — $150), and allowed the commission on rentals only to the amount of $27.15 . . . the composition offer, and (b) one year’s rentals (except to the extent on which the commission of $27.15 . . .

In J. BACON SONS, 224 F. 764 (W.D. Ky. 1915)

. . . one month and two days was $2,715, and upon the disbursement of that sum the referee was entitled to $27.15 . . . Kinkead, is entitled only to $27.15 in excess of the amount of the five items on his “statement of charges . . . This $27.15 has already been paid to him; that is to1 say, the fees he has earned in the case, including . . . the $27.15, amount to the aggregate of only $383.13, while he has been paid $500 by the trustee out . . .

OFNER v. WEIGEL, 199 F. 720 (9th Cir. 1912)

. . . I-Iolter................................................. 27.15 Emil Weil............................ . . .

c. d,, 9 Fla. 22 (Fla. 1860)

. . . satisfied the following debt without suit, to wit: Kopman & liyers’ account, paid 13th June, 1829, for $27.15 . . .