The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 27
STATE ATTORNEYS; PUBLIC DEFENDERS; RELATED OFFICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 27.25

27.25 State attorney authorized to employ personnel; funding formula.—

(1) The state attorney of each judicial circuit is authorized to employ and establish, in such number as is authorized by the General Appropriations Act, assistant state attorneys and other staff pursuant to s. 29.005. The state attorneys of all judicial circuits shall jointly develop a coordinated classification and pay plan which shall be submitted on or before January 1 of each year to the Justice Administrative Commission, the office of the President of the Senate, and the office of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Such plan shall be developed in accordance with policies and procedures of the Executive Office of the Governor established pursuant to s. 216.181.

(2) The state attorney of each judicial circuit is authorized to employ an executive director. The salary of the executive director shall be set by the state attorney in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Executive Office of the Governor established pursuant to s. 216.181 and shall not exceed 90 percent of the state attorney’s salary. The duties of the executive director shall be as prescribed by the state attorney.

(3) In any judicial circuit where a court reporter is not available, any stenographer employed by a state attorney is authorized and may be required to perform the services of a court reporter and shall be entitled to receive the per diem and fees provided by law for such services.

(4) All payments for the salary of the state attorney and the necessary expenses of office, including salaries of deputies, assistants, and staff, shall be considered as being for a valid public purpose.

(5) The appropriations for the offices of state attorneys shall be determined by a funding formula based on population and such other factors as may be deemed appropriate in a manner to be determined by this section and the General Appropriations Act.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 17261, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4759(9); s. 1, ch. 18147, 1937; s. 1, ch. 18148, 1937; s. 1, ch. 22188, 1943; s. 1, ch. 22905, 1945; ss. 2, 3, ch. 25243, 1949; s. 1, ch. 29952, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-301; s. 5, ch. 67-324; s. 4, ch. 69-212; s. 1, ch. 69-257; s. 2, ch. 72-326; s. 1, ch. 73-215; s. 2, ch. 79-344; s. 1, ch. 81-230; s. 1, ch. 87-85; s. 129, ch. 95-147; s. 9, ch. 2003-402.

F.S. 27.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 27.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 27.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 27.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 27.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP., 593 B.R. 217 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . Of the $31 million settlement payment, $27.25 million was paid to EFIH for distribution to EFIH unsecured . . .

ALMANZA, v. UNITED STATES, 135 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2018)

. . . Kern's services, 26.5 hours were attributable to depositions conducted in Washington in June 2015 and 27.25 . . .

ARUANNO, v. S. CORZINE, DOC, DOC, M. DHS, G. E. DMHS, F. DOC ADTC STUs STUs, 687 F. App'x 226 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . (citing N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.25(a) and (b)). . . .

ELEY, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 201 F. Supp. 3d 150 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Circuit; and (3) 27.25 hours in connection with the present proceedings on remand. . . .

DOES v. A. COOPER III,, 148 F. Supp. 3d 477 (M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . 27.32); and statutory rape of a person who is 15 years of age or younger (§ 14-27.7A recodified as § 14-27.25 . . .

E. PEREZ, v. OAK GROVE CINEMAS, INC. LLC, LLC,, 68 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (D. Or. 2014)

. . . total of $1,458.63 and re-performing the calculations results in a figure of 67.25 hours per week, or 27.25 . . . divided by the $8.50 hourly rate = $147.96; $147.96 divided by 2.2 = 67.25; 67.25 minus 40 hours = 27.25 . . . for the pay period, a difference of about $101, or less than 2% of the total owed for this employee (27.25 . . .

In R. MILLER,, 501 B.R. 266 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . pay as a car wash attendant; $1,621.00 in Social Security benefits; $2,487.94 from his annuity; and $27.25 . . . income consists of: $ 610.44 net income from employment 1,621.00 Social Security 2,487.94 the Annuity 27.25 . . .

P. AUSIKAITIS, ON BEHALF OF MASIMO CORPORATION, v. KIANI, a, 962 F. Supp. 2d 661 (D. Del. 2013)

. . . (Id. at ¶¶ 8, 50) These options were awarded by the Committee at an exercise price of $27.25 per share . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. MARTIN,, 714 F.3d 1081 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . count V must run consecutive to counts I-IV and recommended a guidelines range of 262-327 months (21.83-27.25 . . .

THIBODEAUX v. J. ASTRUE,, 914 F. Supp. 2d 789 (E.D. La. 2012)

. . . Plaintiff asks the Court for an award of $4,952.00 in attorney’s fees under the EAJA for 27.25 hours . . . In response, defendant states that he does not object to an award of fees for 25.25 of the 27.25 hours . . .

TERRY, d b a v. UNITED STATES,, 103 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . She then awarded a contract to The Shirt House, which proposed the highest fee— 27.25 percent. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARRERO,, 651 F.3d 453 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . Once Marrero was secured, Trooper Bush returned to the laundry room, where he found 27.25 grams of crack . . . The district court construed the filing as a motion to suppress the 27.25 grams of crack cocaine recovered . . . Marrero was convicted of possessing 27.25 grams of crack cocaine. . . .

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AAA v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, PA,, 639 F.3d 557 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . Federal paid $26.5 million out of a $27.25 million settlement of the underlying action. . . . Federal seeks to recover from AHA and NUIC $25 million of Federal’s $26.5 share of the $27.25 million . . . the close of trial, AAAMA and Cannon agreed on May 31, 2007, to settle all claims against AAAMA for $27.25 . . . The court noted that under the $27.25 million settlement, (1) the Federal Business Auto Policy, a primary . . .

NBC- USA HOUSING, INC. TWENTY- SIX, v. DONOVAN,, 774 F. Supp. 2d 277 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . § 27.25(d), which states: “If upon application by the mortgagor, the [foreclosure] commissioner refuses . . . The Secretary contends that HUD did not violate 24 C.F.R. § 27.25(d) because the foreclosure commissioner . . . that the attempts by NBC’s counsel to contact Lilley amounted to an “application” under 24 C.F.R. § 27.25 . . . The Secretary contends that an untimely application does not trigger 24 C.F.R. § 27.25(d)’s written response . . . Accordingly, the Court cannot conclude that HUD failed to comply with 24 C.F.R. § 27.25(d) and that the . . .

TERRY, d b a v. UNITED STATES,, 96 Fed. Cl. 156 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . 15, 2008 electronic-mail communication from T-Shirt House submitting a revised fee to the AAFES of 27.25 . . . T-Shirt House remained the highest fee offeror, and its 27.25 percent fee to the AAFES was 2.25 percentage . . . [,] by postal records”), and T-Shirt House submitted its MPOS, which included a fee to the AAFES of 27.25 . . . 15, 2008 electronic-mail communication from T-Shirt House indicating its revised fee to the AAFES of 27.25 . . .

TERRY, d b a v. UNITED STATES,, 96 Fed. Cl. 131 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

ARUANNO, v. HAYMAN,, 384 F. App'x 144 (3d Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 30:4-27.25(c). . . .

In HARDINGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 696 F. Supp. 2d 309 (W.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . On August 9, 2007, when the Company issued its press release, its stock price closed at $27.25, down . . .

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY a s o AAA v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, 664 F. Supp. 2d 397 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Before the close of trial, AAAMA and Cannon agreed to settle for $27.25 million, with Federal contributing . . . Here, Federal paid $26.5 million of the $27.25 million settlement amount to Cannon on behalf of AAAMA . . . Under the $27.25 million settlement, the Federal Business Auto policy, a primary policy not at issue . . .

L. MR. F. v. NORTH HAVEN BOARD OF EDUCATION,, 624 F. Supp. 2d 163 (D. Conn. 2009)

. . . with one-to-one support from the special education staff, the IEP anticipated that L. would receive 27.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WOODS,, 327 F. App'x 170 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . The PSI found that he was accountable for 27.25 ounces (772 grams) of crack cocaine, and his base offense . . .

H. Jr. D. L. v., 130 T.C. 170 (T.C. 2008)

. . . $41.1875 Nov. 8, 1999 40.94 39.31 41.125 40.1250 Jan. 4, 2000 49.25 46.50 47.875 46.6250 Feb. 2, 2001 27.25 . . .

In MILK PALACE DAIRY, LLC, a LLC, v. L N, 385 B.R. 765 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2008)

. . . prior partial payment, in July 2003, involved underpayment of two June invoices totaling $156.32 by $27.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ,, 517 F.3d 651 (2d Cir. 2008)

. . . CHC of VI, results in a Guidelines-recommended range of imprisonment of 262-327 months, or 21.83 to 27.25 . . .

HATCHETT, v. HEALTH CARE AND RETIREMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA, d b a d b a HCR, 186 F. App'x 543 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . Her base pay rate at the time was $27.25 per hour; she was also paid an additional $2.00 per hour shift . . .

WYSER- PRATTE MANAGEMENT CO. INC. v. TELXON CORPORATION, LLP,, 413 F.3d 553 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . That same day, Telxon stock fell from $27.25 to close at $15 per share and the first shareholder class . . .

ALZA CORPORATION v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., 310 F. Supp. 2d 610 (D. Vt. 2004)

. . . reduced the number of claims it was asserting against Mylan to four: claims 59.11, 59.15, 61.31 and 27.25 . . . Claims 61.31 and 27.25 are device claims. . . . Claim 27.25 reads as follows: A medical device for the transdermal administration to a human being of . . . , the Court concludes that Mylan’s ANDA filing for a generic version of Duragesic® infringes claims 27.25 . . .

OSHER, v. JNI CORPORATION,, 308 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (S.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . last order, the percentage of stocks sold by Defendants Flanagan, Gregory and McKnett (20.76%, 21.36%, 27.25% . . .

S. FLAHERTY, v. MARCHAND, a a a, 284 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (N.D. Ill. 2003)

. . . 79.25 hour total between April 9 and May 27, 2003, reduced by one-third, rounds out to 52 hours — a 27.25 . . .

OSHER, v. JNI CORPORATION,, 302 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (S.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . McKnett Class Period 23.00 27.25% Pre-Class not alleged .13.11% E. . . . By this standard, the amounts sold by Defendants Flanagan, Gregory and McKnett—20.76%, 21.36% and 27.25% . . .

OCHANA, v. FLORES, 206 F. Supp. 2d 941 (N.D. Ill. 2002)

. . . color prints for $19.75 and reproduction of photographs taken of property recovered from plaintiff for $27.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. WEBB,, 255 F.3d 890 (D.C. Cir. 2001)

. . . category of VI, would have yielded a sentencing range of 262 to 327 months — for a maximum sentence of 27.25 . . .

BLACKMAN, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v., 145 F. Supp. 2d 47 (D.D.C. 2001)

. . . Plaintiff originally sought $33,595.00 in attorneys’ fees and $27.25 in costs for a total of $33,622.25 . . . plaintiff was reasonably entitled to $32,682 in attorneys’ fees, a reduction of $913.00, along with the $27.25 . . . attorneys’ fees and costs, defendants were required to pay only $287.25 of the award at that time — $27.25 . . .

J. LONDON, v. A. HALTER,, 134 F. Supp. 2d 940 (E.D. Tenn. 2001)

. . . current fee request based upon $136.24 per hour for experienced attorneys, one-fifth of $136.24 is $27.25 . . .

J. LONDON, v. A. HALTER,, 203 F. Supp. 2d 367 (E.D. Tenn. 2001)

. . . current fee request based upon $136.24 per hour for experienced attorneys, one-fifth of $136.24 is $27.25 . . .

MARISOL A. Dr. FORBES, Jr. v. W. GIULIANI,, 111 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . Firestein 175.00 27.25 4,768.75 S. Lambíase 150.00 20.97 3.145.50 E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITFIELD,, 89 F. Supp. 2d 587 (E.D. Pa. 2000)

. . . .38 caliber handgun lying on the floor near Hayes, and, after obtaining consent to search, they found 27.25 . . . adding the weights of the cocaine base found in the heat register and the safe in James Hayes' bedroom (27.25 . . .

HARTLINE, v. STATE, 743 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Hartline was then sentenced to 27.25 years in prison on count four, concurrent 15-year sentences on counts . . .

In TELXON CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 67 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Ohio 1999)

. . . this announcement; by mid-morning, the market price had dropped to $16.06 from a closing price of $27.25 . . .

In G. PENNELL, AT T v. G., 238 B.R. 737 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999)

. . . totaling the following amounts in each month: November, 1996 $2,637.94 December, 1996 823.16 January, 1997 27.25 . . .

E. BUTLER, v. STATE, 735 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . multiplied by seventy-five percent, the minimum prison term should have been 21.15 months instead of the 27.25 . . .

OFFICES TOGOLAIS DES PHOSPHATES, a TOGO, a v. MULBERRY PHOSPHATES, INC. a, 62 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . In September of 1995, Cargill initially offered to deliver phosphate to MPI’s Mulberry plant for $27.25 . . .

In SOFAMOR DANEK GROUP, INC. G. MURPHY, v. SOFAMOR DANEK GROUP, INC. E. Y. D. F. D. J., 123 F.3d 394 (6th Cir. 1997)

. . . During the fourth quarter of 1993 the price per share ranged between a low of $27.25 and a high of $38.75 . . .

ALPERN D. v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., 84 F.3d 1525 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . Since the price of UtiliCorp stock on August 6,1992 was $27.25 per share, and the highest price Alpern . . .

AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY M., 72 F.3d 907 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . First, the government objects to petitioners’ request for 27.25 hours of associate time and 6.25 hours . . .

In E. WARD,, 190 B.R. 242 (Bankr. D. Md. 1995)

. . . respect to the first cash collateral order, this court will authorize compensation from the debtor for 27.25 . . . pleadings — 1.75 hours o APPENDIX E CASH COLLATERAL ORDERS A. 1st Cash Collateral Order — Hours Allowed — 27.25 . . .

In BROWNING- FERRIS INDUSTRIES INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 876 F. Supp. 870 (S.D. Tex. 1995)

. . . quarter Form 10-Q issued. (2) February 25, 1991: BFI Vice President Gerald Burger sold 19,500 shares at $27.25 . . .

D. ROTHER, v. E. SHALALA,, 869 F. Supp. 899 (D. Kan. 1994)

. . . Plaintiff requests $3,294.53 (27.25 hours x $120.90/hour) for attorney’s fees and $145.00 for court costs . . .

SEIDMAN, v. AMERICAN MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC., 157 F.R.D. 354 (E.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . because AMS’s stock has actually risen in value since the end of the class period, trading as high as $27.25 . . . While it traded as high as $27.25 per share on November 1, 1993, it also traded as low as $2.25 per share . . .

RAINEY, v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 832 F. Supp. 127 (E.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . Smith 80.00 27.25 27.25 2,180.00 $13,431.90 13. . . .

VON CLARK, v. BUTLER,, 916 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . Clark also sought fees of $4,087.50 for 27.25 hours of work by co-counsel T.E. . . .

GENEVA LIMITED PARTNERS, a a v. KEMP, M., 779 F. Supp. 1237 (N.D. Cal. 1990)

. . . Plaintiffs also argue that HUD’s notice was defective under 24 CFR § 27.25(a)(2), because the notice . . .

NOVELTY TEXTILE MILLS, INC. v. C. T. EASTERN, INC. d b a, 743 F. Supp. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . The yarn for the Nomex costs $27.25 per lb. . . .

WENDIMERE VILLAS PHASE I CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. GEISLER, 42 Fla. Supp. 2d 207 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1990)

. . . At the time of the hearing, the association owed 11.0 hours at $200.00 per hour for Avery and 27.25 hours . . .

In PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 733 F. Supp. 668 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . earnings and sales declined, and the market price of Par common stock, which had traded as high as 27.25 . . .

MANLEY, v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 18 Cl. Ct. 799 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . 51.50 hours @ $200.00/hour, $10,300.00 Associates: 20.00 hours @ $125.00/hour 2,500.00 Paralegals: 27.25 . . .

D. STOCKS, v. SULLIVAN,, 717 F. Supp. 397 (E.D.N.C. 1989)

. . . attorney fees of Three Thousand One Hundred Thirty-Three Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($3,133.75) (27.25 . . . The remaining 27.25 hours, however, are a reasonable amount of time under the instant facts. . . . $3,133.75) based on the reasonable hourly rate of $115.00 times the compensable number of hours, which is 27.25 . . . attorney fees of Three Thousand One Hundred Thirty-Three Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($3,133.75) (27.25 . . .

P. LUBIN, v. SYBEDON CORPORATION,, 688 F. Supp. 1425 (S.D. Cal. 1988)

. . . This plan was funded by a construction loan of $27.25 million from Home Federal and an Urban Development . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ELZY, U. S., 25 M.J. 416 (C.M.A. 1988)

. . . ; and with wrongfully possessing and wrongfully distributing (one specification each) approximately 27.25 . . .

MOORE, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 674 F. Supp. 901 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . 814.21 Anika Cox Matthew Bogin Beth Goodman Costs TOTAL AWARD $115.00 75.00 17.5 1.5 $2012.50 112.50 27.25 . . .

MATHUS, v. HECKLER,, 661 F. Supp. 241 (N.D. Ill. 1987)

. . . represents that it would not object to a fee of $3,406.25, which would compensate plaintiff’s counsel for 27.25 . . .

LEBRON, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,, 665 F. Supp. 923 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . Weightman claims 86.25 hours drafting and editing the pleadings before the trial court, 27.25 hours drafting . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. RENO,, 758 F.2d 581 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 27.25(1) (1981). . Fla.Stat. § 110.205(2)(k) (1981). . . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . This action is dismissed. 27.25 27.42 25 30 28 26 21 5 25 20 18 27 27 13 49 6 10 28 36 21 26 3 27 18 . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. HERRING,, 750 F.2d 669 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Internal Revenue, 369 F.2d 629, 633 (8th Cir.1966), and 6a Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain, No. 27.25 . . .

N. A. CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, v. UNITED STATES, 5 Cl. Ct. 52 (Cl. Ct. 1984)

. . . . § 875(6); D.C.Code § 16-1353 (1973); 6A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 27.25[1] (3d ed. 1981). . . .

ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 724 F.2d 211 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

. . . Requested Hours Rate Lodestar Banzhaf 76.50 $110 $ 8,415.00 Pfeiffer 79.75 $100 $ 7,975.00 Mueller 27.25 . . .

STATE v. MARTINEZ,, 433 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See §§ 27.25(4), 27.-33(l)(h), Fla.Stat. (1981). We cannot agree. . . .

VULCAN SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY, INC. v. FIRE DEPARTMENT OF CITY OF WHITE PLAINS, 533 F. Supp. 1054 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . that effort, which plaintiffs’ attorneys informed the Court, on the basis of the time sheets, to be 27.25 . . .

DOUGHERTY v. HOOLIHAN, NEILS, AND BOLAND, LTD., 531 F. Supp. 717 (D. Minn. 1982)

. . . The list reflects: 1) 27.25 hours by Kurt Anderson, managing attorney for Western Legal Services, at . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. SAGE REALTY CORPORATION,, 521 F. Supp. 263 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . motion for summary judgment on the basis of 18.25 hours of research time for Rossein, rather than the 27.25 . . .

R. LAURE L. W- L MOLDING COMPANY, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 653 F.2d 253 (6th Cir. 1981)

. . . . ($34,000.00 plus $141,548.31) 175,548.31 27.25% Prepaid interest 33,996.22 5.28% $644,297.78 100.00% . . .

J. FULCHER, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 632 F.2d 278 (4th Cir. 1980)

. . . United States, 324 U.S. 229, 65 S.Ct. 631, 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945); 6A Nichols, Eminent Domain, § 27.25 ( . . .

In CHICKEN ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 560 F. Supp. 963 (N.D. Ga. 1980)

. . . For April, 1977, the monthly total is 27.25 hours, but the column of figures adds up to only 9.75 hours . . .

D. POUNCY, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 499 F. Supp. 427 (S.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . 20.44 24.18 20.56 24.59 21.26 26.36 22.72 Level 5 19.32 21.70 18.85 21.24 22.93 22.59 30.00 25.07 32.87 27.25 . . .

A- B CATTLE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 621 F.2d 1099 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . See also 6A Nichols, Eminent Domain, § 27.25 (Rev. 3d ed. 1976). . . .

A- B CATTLE COMPANY, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 223 Ct. Cl. 514 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . See also 6A Nichols, Eminent Domain, § 27.25 (Rev. 3d ed. 1976). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEDFORD ASSOCIATES, a K. BOWERY SAYINGS BANK, v. BEDFORD ASSOCIATES, 618 F.2d 904 (2d Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 258a (1976); see generally 6A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 27.25 (rev. 3d ed. 1976). . . .

I. SELZER, v. BERKOWITZ, W. R. W. M. B. T. Z. A. H. D D. V. R. B. A. J., 477 F. Supp. 686 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . They applied their normal billing rates of approximately $125 per hour for partners time and between $27.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PARSONS,, 448 F. Supp. 733 (W.D. Mo. 1978)

. . . Rule 27.25 of the Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure not only authorizes a defendant to file a motion . . . Rule 27.25 of the Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure, unlike procedures provided by the Federal Rules . . . 504 S.W.2d 291 (Mo.App.1973), shows that the State trial and State appellate court considered a Rule 27.25 . . . Rule 27.25, V.A.M.R.” And State v. . . . Rule 27.25 of the Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that: A motion to withdraw a plea of . . .

B. DeGREGORIO, v. SEGAL, HCFAP HCFAP, HCFAP,, 443 F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1978)

. . . series of discussions which culminated in a conspiracy to 1) have the rate of reimbursement raised to $27.25 . . .

J. LANDER, v. C. B. MORTON,, 518 F.2d 1084 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . Court costs $ 27.25 b. Appeal Bond Costs 10.00 c. Printing Costs 807.15 d. . . .

WINFORD, v. R. SWENSON,, 517 F.2d 1114 (8th Cir. 1975)

. . . later, Winford sought post-conviction relief in state court pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rules 27.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS,, 512 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . United States, 350 F.2d 356, 360 (5th Cir. 1964); 6A Nichols on Eminent Domain § 27.25 (1974); 26 Am.Jur . . .

STATE v. GARRETT, 310 So. 2d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 27.25(2) (1973) and Rule 1.035, F.R.C.P. 8. . . .

RUSSELL, v. W. WYRICK,, 395 F. Supp. 643 (W.D. Mo. 1974)

. . . motion to withdraw his guilty plea and to vacate sentence and judgment under Missouri Criminal Rules 27.25 . . .

EAGAN, L. v. M. DeMANIO, a, 294 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 1974)

. . . . § 27.25(1), F.S.A.), and authorizing such investigators to serve arrest warrants, search warrants, . . .

J. SENNOTT v. RODMAN RENSHAW,, 474 F.2d 32 (7th Cir. 1973)

. . . Amounts Number of Closing Received Date Shares Price by Sennott 2/26/65 1,000 $27.25 $27,250.00 3/ 3/ . . .

E. REDUS, v. R. SWENSON,, 339 F. Supp. 571 (E.D. Mo. 1972)

. . . his guilty plea and to vacate unlawful judgment and sentence pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rules 27.25 . . .

PPG v., 55 T.C. 928 (T.C. 1970)

. . . November 1961 Almeida and bis associates owned 72.75 percent of CVB while petitioner indirectly owned 27.25 . . . Almeida was willing to pay $1,150,000 for the 27.25-percent interest in CYB beld by Pittsburco and PPGI . . . shares of CVB stock from Pittsburco, PPGI sold in Switzerland all of its CVB stock (representing a 27.25 . . . for the stated amount, PPGI sold such CVB stock together with its own CVB stock (a total interest of 27.25 . . .

Mr. N. WRIGHT, a v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY, a D. L. E., 319 F. Supp. 1364 (N.D. Miss. 1970)

. . . parent will reasonably incur licensed practical nursing expenses for the next 8 y2 years at a cost of $27.25 . . .

CHEVRON OIL COMPANY, v. D. CLARK W. C. P. J. D. E. La-, 432 F.2d 280 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . In sum, we hold that the Richardson group is entitled to a 27.25% working interest in the property, while . . .

MOUNTJOY, v. R. SWENSON,, 306 F. Supp. 379 (W.D. Mo. 1969)

. . . provide for appeal from a guilty plea; that he filed postconviction motions under Missouri Criminal Rules 27.25 . . . of petitioner’s appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court from the overruling and denying of petitioner’s 27.25 . . . Mountjoy, supra,) reveal that a hearing was held on his 27.25 and 27.26 motions in the state trial court . . .

TYLER, v. R. SWENSON,, 306 F. Supp. 1200 (E.D. Mo. 1969)

. . . Rules 27.25 and 27.26 V.A.M.R. to withdraw the plea of guilty and set aside the judgment as to each charge . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. BRINKER T. F. L., 413 F.2d 733 (10th Cir. 1969)

. . . See 6 Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain § 27.25 [1] (3d ed. 1965). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN INTERESTS IN PROPERTY IN CITY OF WARWICK, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, a, 281 F. Supp. 342 (E.D. Va. 1968)

. . . amendments to the declaration of taking do not affect these rights. 6 Nichols, Eminent Domain, section 27.25 . . .

JACKSON, v. R. SWENSON,, 267 F. Supp. 681 (W.D. Mo. 1967)

. . . Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri, for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 27.25 . . .

COVERED WAGON, INC. D. W. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. COVERED WAGON, INC. D. W., 369 F.2d 629 (8th Cir. 1966)

. . . Sec. 27.25(1) A, p. 322; 4 Tiffany, Real Property, (3d ed., 1939), Sec. 1255, pp. 685-686; Rev.Rul. 59 . . .

MARTIN, v. ROSENBAUM,, 329 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1964)

. . . It granted judgment for $3,990.50, interest of $250.22 and costs of $27.25. . . .

UNITED STATES v. AHTANUM IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a, 330 F.2d 897 (9th Cir. 1964)

. . . Witness Croxford excluded from these parcels 4.5 acres as not irrigated in 1908; the net was therefore 27.25 . . .