Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 27.54 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 27.54 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 27.54 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 27.54

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 27
STATE ATTORNEYS; PUBLIC DEFENDERS; RELATED OFFICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 27.54
27.54 Limitation on payment of expenditures other than by the state.
(1) All payments for the salary of the public defender and the criminal conflict and civil regional counsel and for the necessary expenses of office, including salaries of assistants and staff, shall be considered as being for a valid public purpose. Travel expenses shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of s. 112.061.
(2) A county or municipality may contract with, or appropriate or contribute funds to, the operation of the offices of the various public defenders and regional counsels as provided in this subsection. A public defender or regional counsel defending violations of special laws or county or municipal ordinances punishable by incarceration and not ancillary to a state charge shall contract with counties and municipalities to recover the full cost of services rendered on an hourly basis or reimburse the state for the full cost of assigning one or more full-time equivalent attorney positions to work on behalf of the county or municipality. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of a county with a population of less than 75,000, the public defender or regional counsel shall contract for full reimbursement, or for reimbursement as the parties otherwise agree. In local ordinance violation cases, the county or municipality shall pay for due process services that are approved by the court, including deposition costs, deposition transcript costs, investigative costs, witness fees, expert witness costs, and interpreter costs. The person charged with the violation shall be assessed a fee for the services of a public defender or regional counsel and other costs and fees paid by the county or municipality, which assessed fee may be reduced to a lien, in all instances in which the person enters a plea of guilty or no contest or is found to be in violation or guilty of any count or lesser included offense of the charge or companion case charges, regardless of adjudication. The court shall determine the amount of the obligation. The county or municipality may recover assessed fees through collections court or as otherwise permitted by law, and any fees recovered pursuant to this section shall be forwarded to the applicable county or municipality as reimbursement.
(a) A contract for reimbursement on an hourly basis shall require a county or municipality to reimburse the public defender or regional counsel for services rendered at a rate of $50 per hour. If an hourly rate is specified in the General Appropriations Act, that rate shall control.
(b) A contract for assigning one or more full-time equivalent attorney positions to perform work on behalf of the county or municipality shall assign one or more full-time equivalent positions based on estimates by the public defender or regional counsel of the number of hours required to handle the projected workload. The full cost of each full-time equivalent attorney position on an annual basis shall be $50, or the amount specified in the General Appropriations Act, multiplied by the legislative budget request standard for available work hours for one full-time equivalent attorney position, or, in the absence of that standard, 1,854 hours. The contract may provide for funding full-time equivalent positions in one-quarter increments.
(c) Any payments received pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited into the Grants and Donations Trust Fund of the applicable public defender or criminal conflict and civil regional counsel for appropriation by the Legislature.
(3) No public defender, assistant public defender, regional counsel, or assistant regional counsel shall receive from any county or municipality any supplemental salary, except as provided in this section.
(4) Unless expressly authorized by law or in the General Appropriations Act, public defenders and regional counsel are prohibited from spending state-appropriated funds on county funding obligations under s. 14, Art. V of the State Constitution. This includes expenditures on communications services and facilities as defined in s. 29.008. This does not prohibit a public defender from spending funds for these purposes in exceptional circumstances when necessary to maintain operational continuity in the form of a short-term advance pending reimbursement from the county. If a public defender or regional counsel provides short-term advance funding for a county responsibility as authorized by this subsection, the public defender or regional counsel shall request full reimbursement from the board of county commissioners prior to making the expenditure or at the next meeting of the board of county commissioners after the expenditure is made. The total of all short-term advances authorized by this subsection shall not exceed 2 percent of the public defender’s or regional counsel’s approved operating budget in any given year. No short-term advances authorized by this subsection shall be permitted until all reimbursements arising from advance funding in the prior state fiscal year have been received by the public defender or regional counsel. All reimbursement payments received by the public defender or regional counsel shall be deposited into the General Revenue Fund. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, the public defender or regional counsel may expend funds for the purchase of computer systems, including associated hardware and software, and for personnel related to this function.
History.s. 5, ch. 63-409; s. 3, ch. 67-539; s. 4, ch. 72-327; s. 2, ch. 72-722; s. 3, ch. 73-216; s. 6, ch. 80-376; s. 4, ch. 85-213; s. 4, ch. 88-280; s. 1, ch. 89-118; s. 2, ch. 91-303; s. 140, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 141, ch. 95-147; s. 21, ch. 2003-402; s. 12, ch. 2004-265; s. 5, ch. 2005-236; s. 12, ch. 2007-62; s. 6, ch. 2019-3; s. 2, ch. 2024-153.

F.S. 27.54 on Google Scholar

F.S. 27.54 on CourtListener

Amendments to 27.54


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 27.54

Total Results: 15

In Re Order on Prosecution of Cr. App.

561 So. 2d 1130

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1990 | Docket: 1480585

Cited 57 times | Published

expenses incurred in cases on appeal." [5] Section 27.54, Florida Statutes (1989), provides in pertinent

Shuman v. State

358 So. 2d 1333

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1978 | Docket: 1311872

Cited 28 times | Published

paying for the transcripts in question, citing Section 27.54(2), Florida Statutes (1975), which provides:

Cade v. State

658 So. 2d 550, 1995 WL 326107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1995 | Docket: 439566

Cited 25 times | Published

as costs in the same manner as other costs. Section 27.54(3), Florida Statutes (1991), further provides

City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Crowder

983 So. 2d 37, 2008 WL 1883899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2008 | Docket: 1668123

Cited 5 times | Published

69." [e.s.] § 27.51(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). Section 27.54 further provides: "A public defender or regional

Dade County v. Baker

362 So. 2d 151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1978 | Docket: 1363047

Cited 5 times | Published

Constitution; and Section 27.54, Florida Statutes (1977). Especially noted is Section 27.54(2), Florida Statutes

Martin v. State

711 So. 2d 117, 1998 WL 204811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1998 | Docket: 1700605

Cited 2 times | Published

indigent it must pay for a trial transcript. See § 27.54(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). We conclude that the financial

Brown v. State

682 So. 2d 667, 1996 WL 637648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1996 | Docket: 1681056

Cited 2 times | Published

by twenty-five years of probation. Second, section 27.54, Florida Statutes, allows the trial court to

Morris v. State

742 So. 2d 429, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12297, 1999 WL 770679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1999 | Docket: 64791396

Published

attorney, exercising the county’s rights under section 27.54(3), Florida Statutes (1995), asked for a hearing

Batson v. State

700 So. 2d 1244, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12015, 1997 WL 661416

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1997 | Docket: 64776380

Published

clear that the types of costs referred to in section 27.54(3), Florida Statutes, i.e. travel expenses,

Louis v. State

667 So. 2d 851, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 214, 1996 WL 13788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1996 | Docket: 64762188

Published

consultation fee of an expert witness pursuant to section 27.54(3), Florida Statutes (1993).1 The court denied

Lee County v. Eaton

642 So. 2d 1126, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9002, 1994 WL 510845

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1994 | Docket: 64751025

Published

are not applicable to a typical civil case. See § 27.54(3), Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Shuman

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 5, 1986 | Docket: 3257978

Published

reference to county payment of such costs. Section 27.54, F.S., provides: Expenditures for public defender's

County of Seminole v. Padilla

470 So. 2d 28, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13939, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1985 | Docket: 64612412

Published

of a criminal case. The County relies upon section 27.54(2), Florida Statutes (1984), which prohibits

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 10, 1984 | Docket: 3258441

Published

court succinctly stated: An examination of Section 27.54 in its entirety reflects that the enactment

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 5, 1976 | Docket: 3258534

Published

"operation" of the public defender's office. Section 27.54(2). Another provision, however, states that