Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 27.706 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 27.706 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 27.706

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 27
STATE ATTORNEYS; PUBLIC DEFENDERS; RELATED OFFICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 27.706
27.706 Private practice of law prohibited.Each capital collateral regional counsel and all full-time assistants appointed by him or her shall serve on a full-time basis and may not engage in the private practice of law.
History.s. 3, ch. 85-332; s. 150, ch. 95-147; s. 6, ch. 97-313.

F.S. 27.706 on Google Scholar

F.S. 27.706 on Casetext

Amendments to 27.706


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 27.706
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 27.706.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 27.706

Total Results: 5

Melton v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-10

Citation: 56 So. 3d 868, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3211, 2011 WL 831135

Snippet: expressly authorize CCRC to do so. . Section 27.706, Florida Statutes (2009) prohibits lawyers employed

State v. Kilgore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-11-21

Citation: 976 So. 2d 1066, 2007 WL 4142744

Snippet: record. § 27.702(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). Section 27.706, Florida Statutes, also prohibits CCRC from engaging

Kornfeld v. Diaz

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-04-06

Citation: 634 So. 2d 799, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3082, 1994 WL 112251

Snippet: it entirely. The Kornfelds would still be owed $27,706.35. We hold that a total denial of a deficiency

St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-06-09

Citation: 249 So. 2d 27

Snippet: and that the present value of such benefits was $27,706.05. The Judge therefore reset the award of attorney's

Farnham v. Blount

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-08-04

Citation: 11 So. 2d 785, 152 Fla. 208, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 727

Snippet: We have for review three appeals from final decrees entered by the Circuit Court of Escambia County, Florida, foreclosing three separate and different purchase price mortgages upon the individual interests in the home of the late W.A. Blount known as "Seamarge." One of the mortgages was to the adult heirs, while the other was to the minor heirs of the late W.A. Blount. The appeal identified as No. 3 involves a purchase money mortgage not on any portion of the Blount home but on a small tract of land