Notes of Decisions
Olive v. Maas, 811 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 2002).
· cites it 8× “Pursuant to section 27.710, Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), ("the Registry Act"), Olive sought appointment through the registry of attorneys who are available to represent defendants in postconviction capital collateral proceedings, and on September 1, 1998, Judge Donald R.”
Florida Dept. of Fin. Serv. v. Freeman, 921 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2006).
· cites it 10× “While I suspect that most, if not all, of the attorney's work in this case was foreseeable at the time of contracting, the record is simply too sparse to know for sure. The trial court will have to evaluate the issue on remand.”
Thomas v. McDonough, 452 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (M.D. Fla. 2006).
· cites it 8× “See § 27.710, Fla. Stat. 7 . "While defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel at trial and on direct appeal, they do not have a corresponding right to counsel when collaterally attacking their convictions.”
Peede v. State, 748 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1999).
· cites it 2× “We note that in this past legislative session, the legislature amended section 27.710, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), by adding subsection (12) which states: "The court shall monitor the performance of assigned counsel to ensure that the capital defendant is receiving quality…”
Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010).
· cites it 2× “Fla. Stat. §§27.710 , 27.711(2) (2007). By September 19, 2002—316 days after his appointment and 12 days before the 1-year AEDPA limitations period expired—Collins, acting on Holland’s behalf, filed a motion for postconvic tion relief in the state trial court.”
Maas v. Olive, 992 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 2008).
· cites it 5× “(codified as §§ 27.710-27.711, Fla. Stat. (1999)) (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the Registry Act").”
Holland v. Florida, 177 L. Ed. 2d 130 (2010).
“That filing automatically stopped the running of the AEDPA limitations period, § 2244(d)(2), with, as we have said, 12 days left on the clock.”
Allen v. Butterworth, 756 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2000).
· cites it 2× “(creating § 27.710, Fla. Stat. (1999)). In 1997, this Court directed the chief judges to inventory all postconviction proceedings and present quarterly reports to the Court.”
State v. Kilgore, 976 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2007).
· cites it 3× “See § 27.710, Fla. Stat. (2002) (providing for the maintenance of a registry of private attorneys to represent death-sentenced individuals in postconviction proceedings).”
Daniel Lugo v. Sec'y, Florida Dep't of Corr., 750 F.3d 1198 (11th Cir. 2014).
“703 (1), CCRC-Middle Region asked to be permitted to withdraw and for the court to appoint in its place conflict-free registry counsel qualified under Fla. Stat. §§ 27.710 and 27.711. On October 22, 2003, the state postconviction court denied CCRC-Middle Region’s motion to…”
— 27.710(1) — 6 cases
Olive v. Maas, 811 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 2002).
“Pursuant to section 27.710, Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), ("the Registry Act"), Olive sought appointment through the registry of attorneys who are available to represent defendants in postconviction capital collateral proceedings, and on September 1, 1998, Judge Donald R.”
Thomas v. McDonough, 452 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (M.D. Fla. 2006).
“See § 27.710, Fla. Stat. 7 . "While defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel at trial and on direct appeal, they do not have a corresponding right to counsel when collaterally attacking their convictions.”
Florida Dept. of Fin. Serv. v. Freeman, 921 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2006).
“While I suspect that most, if not all, of the attorney's work in this case was foreseeable at the time of contracting, the record is simply too sparse to know for sure. The trial court will have to evaluate the issue on remand.”
Maas v. Olive, 992 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 2008).
“(codified as §§ 27.710-27.711, Fla. Stat. (1999)) (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the Registry Act").”
— 27.710(2) — 2 cases
— 27.710(3) — 2 cases
Florida Dept. of Fin. Serv. v. Freeman, 921 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2006).
“While I suspect that most, if not all, of the attorney's work in this case was foreseeable at the time of contracting, the record is simply too sparse to know for sure. The trial court will have to evaluate the issue on remand.”
— 27.710(4) — 8 cases
Olive v. Maas, 811 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 2002).
“Pursuant to section 27.710, Florida Statutes (Supp.1998), ("the Registry Act"), Olive sought appointment through the registry of attorneys who are available to represent defendants in postconviction capital collateral proceedings, and on September 1, 1998, Judge Donald R.”
Florida Dept. of Fin. Serv. v. Freeman, 921 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2006).
“While I suspect that most, if not all, of the attorney's work in this case was foreseeable at the time of contracting, the record is simply too sparse to know for sure. The trial court will have to evaluate the issue on remand.”
Maas v. Olive, 992 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 2008).
“(codified as §§ 27.710-27.711, Fla. Stat. (1999)) (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the Registry Act").”
— 27.710(5) — 3 cases
Florida Dept. of Fin. Serv. v. Freeman, 921 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2006).
“While I suspect that most, if not all, of the attorney's work in this case was foreseeable at the time of contracting, the record is simply too sparse to know for sure. The trial court will have to evaluate the issue on remand.”
— 27.710(6) — 3 cases
Florida Dept. of Fin. Serv. v. Freeman, 921 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 2006).
“While I suspect that most, if not all, of the attorney's work in this case was foreseeable at the time of contracting, the record is simply too sparse to know for sure. The trial court will have to evaluate the issue on remand.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.