Florida Statute 29.015 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 29
COURT SYSTEM FUNDING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 29.015

29.015 Contingency fund; limitation of authority to transfer funds in contracted due process services appropriation categories.—

(1) An appropriation may be provided in the General Appropriations Act in the Justice Administrative Commission to serve as a contingency fund for the purpose of alleviating deficits in contracted due process services appropriation categories, including private court-appointed counsel appropriation categories, that may occur from time to time due to extraordinary cases that lead to unexpected expenditures.

(2) In the event that a state attorney, public defender, or criminal conflict and civil regional counsel incurs a deficit in a contracted due process services appropriation category or conflict counsel category, the following steps shall be taken in order:

(a) The state attorney, public defender, or regional counsel shall first attempt to identify surplus funds from other appropriation categories within his or her office and submit a budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216 to transfer funds from within the office.

(b) In the event that the state attorney, public defender, or regional counsel is unable to identify surplus funds from within his or her office, he or she shall certify this to the Justice Administrative Commission along with a complete explanation of the circumstances which led to the deficit and steps the office has taken to reduce or alleviate the deficit. The Justice Administrative Commission shall inquire as to whether any other office has surplus funds in its contracted due process services appropriation categories which can be transferred to the office that is experiencing the deficit. If other offices indicate that surplus funds are available within the same budget entity, the Justice Administrative Commission shall transfer the amount needed to fund the deficit and notify the Governor and the chair and vice chair of the Legislative Budget Commission 14 days prior to a transfer pursuant to the notice, review, and objection provisions of s. 216.177. If funds appropriated for this purpose are available in a different budget entity, the Justice Administrative Commission shall request a budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216.

(c) If no office indicates that surplus funds are available to alleviate the deficit, the Justice Administrative Commission may request a budget amendment to transfer funds from the contingency fund. Such transfers shall be in accordance with all applicable provisions of chapter 216 and shall be subject to review and approval by the Legislative Budget Commission. The Justice Administrative Commission shall submit the documentation provided by the office explaining the circumstances that led to the deficit and the steps taken by the office and the Justice Administrative Commission to identify surplus funds to the Legislative Budget Commission.

(3) In the event that there is a deficit in a statewide contracted due process services appropriation category provided for private court-appointed counsel necessary due to withdrawal of the public defender and criminal conflict and civil regional counsel due to an ethical conflict, the following steps shall be taken in order:

(a) The Justice Administrative Commission shall first attempt to identify surplus funds from other contracted due process services appropriation categories within the Justice Administrative Commission and submit a budget amendment pursuant to chapter 216 to transfer funds from within the commission.

(b) In the event that the Justice Administrative Commission is unable to identify surplus funds from within the commission, the commission shall inquire of each of the public defenders and regional counsel as to whether any office has surplus funds in its contracted due process services appropriations categories which can be transferred. If any public defender or regional counsel office or offices indicate that surplus funds are available, the Justice Administrative Commission shall request a budget amendment to transfer funds from the office or offices to alleviate the deficit upon agreement of the contributing office or offices.

(c) If no public defender or regional counsel office has surplus funds available to alleviate the deficit, the Justice Administrative Commission may request a budget amendment to transfer funds from the contingency fund. Such transfers shall be in accordance with all applicable provisions of chapter 216 and shall be subject to review and approval by the Legislative Budget Commission. The Justice Administrative Commission shall submit the documentation provided by the office explaining the circumstances that led to the deficit and the steps taken by the Justice Administrative Commission to identify surplus funds to the Legislative Budget Commission.

(4) In the event that there is a deficit in a statewide appropriation category provided for private court-appointed counsel other than for conflict counsel as described in subsection (3), the following steps shall be taken in order:

(b) In the event that the Justice Administrative Commission is unable to identify surplus funds from within the commission, the commission may submit a budget amendment to transfer funds from the contingency fund. Such transfers shall be in accordance with all applicable provisions of chapter 216 and shall be subject to review and approval by the Legislative Budget Commission. The Justice Administrative Commission shall submit documentation explaining the circumstances that led to the deficit and the steps taken to identify surplus funds to the Legislative Budget Commission.

(5) Notwithstanding any provisions in chapter 216 to the contrary, no office shall transfer funds from a contracted due process services appropriation category or from a contingency fund category authorized in this section except as specifically authorized in this section. In addition, funds shall not be transferred from a state attorney office to alleviate a deficit in a public defender office or an office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel, and funds shall not be transferred from a public defender office or regional counsel office to alleviate a deficit in a state attorney office.

History.—s. 49, ch. 2003-402; s. 19, ch. 2005-236; s. 20, ch. 2007-62.

F.S. 29.015 on Google Scholar

F.S. 29.015 on Casetext

Amendments to 29.015

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 29.015

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 29.015.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 29.015

Total Results: 12

In Re Standard Jury Inst. in Crim. Cases No. 2007-03

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-03-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 976 So. 2d 1081

Snippet: and Eluding); 29.13 (Animal Cruelty [Felony]); 29.15 (Disturbing a School, Religious or Lawful Assembly…majority, except that I would sever instructions 29.15 and 29.16 from this opinion and return those instructions…school, religious or lawful assembly (instruction 29.15) and disturbing a military funeral (instruction …Comment This instruction was adopted in 2008. *1096 29.15 DISTURBING A SCHOOL, RELIGIOUS OR LAWFUL ASSEMBLY… school, religious None 871.01(1) 29.15 or lawful assembly -----------------------------

Rivera v. Moore

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-09-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 825 So. 2d 505

Snippet: superintendent [or] warden ...." Id. R. 33-29.015(3). On this record, it is undisputed that appellant…ensure that the Department complies with rule 33-29.015(3). Accordingly, we reverse and remand. On remand…ensure that the Department complies with rule 33-29.015(3) (now rule 33-103.015(3))i.e., that the appropriate

The Florida Bar v. Mason

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-08-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 826 So. 2d 985

Snippet: was $19,164.73, indicating a shortage of $33,941.29; (15) Mason violated rule 5-1.1(a); however, she reserved

Newell v. Moore

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-08-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 767 So. 2d 1240

Snippet: also cites Florida Administrative Code Rule 33-29.015(8) (currently Rule 33-103.015(8)) (prohibiting …violated section 6-1 of Rule 33-22.012. But Rule 33-29.015(8), too, is addressed to prison staff and not in… in terms to inmates. Nor is Rule 33-29.015(8) an order. I would quash the order of dismissal and remand

Daniels v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-03-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 634 So. 2d 187

Snippet: concurrent with the life sentence imposed for count 29. A fifteen year minimum mandatory term was imposed for

Maison Realty, Inc. v. Meredith Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-01-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 633 So. 2d 27, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 301, 1994 WL 19641

Snippet: interest should be reduced in the amount of $34,-029.15. The award in favor of the appel-lee/cross-appellant…judgment to the appellee/eross-appellant by $34,029.15. Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with

City of Gainesville Code Enforcement Bd. v. Lewis

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-12-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 536 So. 2d 1148

Snippet: pertaining to faulty electrical connections and section 29-15(c) relating to zoning for single-family dwellings…noncompliance for the section 15A-35 and section 29-15(c) violations. Exhibit D is the order imposing a

Bayonet Point Reg. Med. Ctr. v. Dhrs

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-11-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 516 So. 2d 995

Snippet: Davis. K. Davis, 5 Administrative Law Treatise, § 29.15 at 394 (2d ed. 1984) [hereafter Davis]. Nevertheless

Pellicano v. Public Health Trust of Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-08-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 401 So. 2d 1156, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20800

Snippet: 4(a); 10 E. McQuillin, Municipal Corporations § 29.15 (3rd ed. 1981). Affirmed. No. 80-2375

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1978-07-07T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: him by law. McQuillin Municipal Corporations s. 29.15. See also AGO 068-6 noting that [w]here the

Porter v. Lorene Investment Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-06-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 297 So. 2d 622

Snippet: Boyer, Florida Real Estate Transactions, Vol. 2, § 29.15. T-259 District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estate of Horne v. Dishong

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-01-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 171 So. 2d 14

Snippet: .” (emphasis added) In Quick v. Owens, 198 S.C. 29, 15 S.E. 2d 837, 137 A.L.R. 201, the court in a comprehensive