The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . §§ 30.49(4), 145.071, this Court has previously found “nothing in Florida law to suggest that the state . . . Stat. §§ 30.49, 951.06(5); Broward Cty. Ord. § 18-01(e). . . . Id. at § 30.49(4). . . . Id at § 30.49(4)(a). . . . Id. at § 30.49(5), (8). . . .
. . . information that was stolen during the breach, the value of this data apparently being appraised at between $30.49 . . .
. . . December 2006 indicates Plaintiffs balance was $2,208.59 and his annual percentage rate of interest was 30.49% . . . interest rate applied — especially considering the HSBC billing statement listed the interest rate as 30.49% . . . the agreement, it does not appear any of the listed rates match either the 6% imposed by Hosto or the 30.49% . . .
. . . Computer storage discs $ 30.49 18. Witness expenses $ 250.00 19. . . .
. . . Id. § 30.49(5). . . . Id. § 30.49(8). The county must then pay out the sheriffs budget in monthly installments. . . . Id. § 30.49(2)(a). . . . Stat. § 30.49(2)(b). . . . Id. § 30.49(2)(c). . . .
. . . See § 30.49, Fla. Stat. (2000). . See § 30.555, Fla. Stat. (2000). . See Applegate v. . . .
. . . ancillary costs included only physical therapy, occupational therapy, and “other therapy,” and was set at $30.49 . . .
. . . Pension — -$30.49 x 32 mo. II 2,439.36 3. 401K — $76.23 X 32 mo. II 406.72 4. . . .
. . . 0.00% 0 0.00% Block 129 84 84 100.00% 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Block 130 82 25 100.00% 30.49% . . .
. . . Wearing apparel advertising in the magazine ranged from a high of 47.42% in one year to a low of 30.49% . . .
. . . See §§ 30.49, 30.50, Fla.Stat. (1987). The county also pays the sheriffs salary. . . . See § 30.49, Fla.Stat. (1987). D. Funds to Satisfy Judgment. . . .
. . . He is an executive officer of the courts and under Florida Statutes 30.49(1) is allowed broad authority . . .
. . . Arcy 8942 29.51% 9146 30.49% 9207 30.69% Foundation Mobile Parts 150 .50% 18 .06% 18 .06% Fairlane Properties . . .
. . . $32.17 3626 1000. 3rd Quarter 1981 33.00 3674 1000 2nd Quarter 1981 32.17 3717 3000 3rd Quarter 1981 30.49 . . .
. . . 33.83 Hood . 256.64 Axle bracket. 292.13 PTO shaft . 98.83 fender . 259.37 fender . 259.37 muffler .30.49 . . .
. . . In so ruling we are cognizant of Section 30.49, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .
. . . recovery of an alleged overpayment by plaintiff of federal corporate income taxes in the amounts of $30.49 . . .
. . . recovery of an alleged overpayment by plaintiff of federal corporate income taxes in the amounts of $30.49 . . .
. . . See also, Sec. 30.49, Fla.Stat. (1975) which provides an administrative budget review mechanism to the . . .
. . . Cost of rental cars 30.49 8. Interest on bank note (to 5/2/75) 25.62 9. Attorney's fees 3050,00. . . . remains on the plaintiff’s list of actual damages are three particulars: (1) cost of rental cars ($30.49 . . .
. . . Secs. 30.49(2)(b) and 30.50(2). . . .
. . . I concur that the contention that F.S. 30.49 is unconstitutional is without merit and I further concur . . . The administrative proceedings leading up to the petition for certiorari were pursuant to § 30.49, Florida . . . Since the effective date of Chapter 74-103, Laws of Florida, 1974, which amended § 30.49, Florida Statutes . . . Administration Commission and it was not bound in any way by the action of the Department of Administration. § 30.49 . . . We further find no merit to petitioner’s contentions that § 30.49, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional . . .
. . . Manatee County which held that the appeal power vested in the Department of Administration by Section 30.49 . . . Section 30.49, presented his proposed budget to the County Commissioners. . . . Section 30.49 to have the budget deletions restored. . . . Section 30.49(4) and (5). . . . Section 30.49(4) to determine utilization of monies once allocated under F. S. Section 30.49(2). . . .
. . . of certiorari, alleging that the order of the Administration Commission was final when entered (F.S. 30.49 . . .
. . . . § 30.49, Defendant Sheriff Carson has never utilized this appeal procedure. . . . budgetary appeal procedure available to the sheriffs in the State of Florida pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 30.49 . . .
. . . The Sheriff, by letter, September 26, 1972, requested a budget amendment as provided in F.S.A. 30.49( . . . F.S.A. 30.49(10) specifically provides an administrative remedy to the Sheriff. . . .
. . . . § 30.49, F.S. . . . In 1959 the 1957 statute was drastically amended and the precursor to the present § 30.49 was adopted . . . F.S. § 30.49, F.S. . . . Florida Statutes § 30.49, F.S.A. explicitly provides that a sheriff, who is a constitutional officer, . . . Holland, 125 So.2d 749 (Fla. 1960). .Laws of Florida 57-368 § 2 (1957 Statute §§ 30.49-30.54). . . . .
. . . Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company between Marquette and Eben Junction, Michigan, a distance of 30.49 . . .
. . . . § 30.49, F.S.A. . Gavagan v. Marshall (1948), 160 Fla. 154, 33 So.2d 862. . . .
. . . On August 25, 1943, plaintiff Ann Nields Garstin inherited from her father 30.49 acres of real estate . . .
. . . On August 25, 1943, plaintiff Ann Nields Garstin inherited from her father .30.49 acres of real estate . . . Nields, 30.49 acres of real estate in Christiana Hundred, New Castle County, Delaware, part of which . . . It was his opinion that the highest and the best use on August 25, 1943, for the total 30.49-acre tract . . .
. . . See § 30.49, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Affirmed. . . .
. . . The 1959 act also amended § 30.49(3) to conform with the changes made in other subsections. . . .
. . . pertains to men’s wearing apparel, ranging from a high of 47.42% of total advertising in 1941 to a low of 30.49% . . .
. . . insurance on mortgaged premises .................. 415.91 Interest on insurance premiums paid .... 30.49 . . .
. . . credited with both these alleged overpayments, Connolly has been overpaid in the sum of $9,091.53 less $30.49 . . . If credited with the smaller sum only, Connolly has been overpaid $2,331 less $30.49=12,300.51. . . . If credited with neither, there is due the claimant $30.49. . . .
. . . credited with both these alleged overpayments, Connolly has been overpaid in the sum of $9,091.53 less $30.49 . . . If credited with the smaller sum only, Connolly has been overpaid $2,331 less $30.49= $2,300.51. . . . If credited with neither, there is due the claimant $30.49. . . .