Cases from cite.case.law:

SCHOTT, v. HOUCEK,, 77 So. 3d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); § 38.05, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

JIMENEZ v. WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS, 660 F.3d 841 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 38.05(a). Except under circumstances not relevant here, this offense is a Class A Misdemeanor. . . . . § 38.05(c). . . .

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY v. STONEBRIDGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 797 F. Supp. 2d 534 (E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . omissions in the performance of ‘professional services.’ ” 4 New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide §§ 38.05 . . . See Thomas et al. eds., 4 New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide, supra, at § 38.05. . . .

CALDWELL, v. THALER,, 770 F. Supp. 2d 849 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . Proc. art. 38.05 (emphasis added). . . .

JIMENEZ v. WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS, 621 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 38.05(a). . . . Id. § 38.05(c), § 12.21. . . . Id. § 38.05(d). . . . authority, we hold that hindering apprehension — other than felony hindering apprehension under section 38.05 . . .

A. FULLARD, Sr. v. UNITED STATES,, 78 Fed. Cl. 294 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . Plaintiff's Inmate Account Analysis indicates his account balance as of June 2007 is $38.05. . . .

FREEMAN, v. GORE,, 483 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 38.05. . . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.05. . . . Hindering Apprehension Texas Penal Code Annotated section 38.05(a), Hindering Apprehension, provides: . . .

RATH, M. D. v. NETWORK MARKETING, L. C. f k a, 944 So. 2d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . However, that statute applies only to orders for disqualification under sections 38.02 or 38.05, dealing . . .

CHARLES, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES DISTRICT NINE, 914 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . While section 38.05, Florida Statutes (2004), authorizes a judge to disqualify herself on her own motion . . .

MARTINEZ, v. M. HODGSON, H. II,, 265 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D. Mass. 2003)

. . . Attorney Aderonke Lipede The Plaintiffs allege that attorney Aderonke Lipede (“Lipede”) spent 38.05 hours . . .

M. WARNER G. v. HOLMES COUNTY,, 717 So. 2d 612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See §§ 38.05, .07, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(h); Orange County v. . . .

SCHLESINGER, v. CHEMICAL BANK G E II, 707 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . that statute applies only to orders entered prior to final judgment or orders entered under section 38.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLOUNT, 123 F.3d 831 (5th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 38.05; Antu v. Eddy, 914 S.W.2d 166 (Tex.App. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLOUNT, 98 F.3d 1489 (5th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 38.05. . Antu v. Eddy, 914 S.W.2d 166, 173 (Tex. . . .

T. RISENHOOVER, v. ENGLAND KWTX d b a McKEEHAN, W. J. G. T. v. ENGLAND KWTX d b a LeBLEU, Sr. W. v. COX TEXAS PUBLICATIONS, INC. KWTX d b a RODRIGUEZ, v. COX TEXAS PUBLICATIONS, INC. KWTX d b a CURTIS, B. III, v. COX TEXAS PUBLICATIONS, INC. KWTX d b a BALLESTEROS, v. COX TEXAS PUBLICATIONS, INC. KWTX d b a WILLIS, v. COX TEXAS PUBLICATIONS, INC. KWTX d b a CHOJNACKI, v. ENGLAND KWTX d b a SARABYN, v. ENGLAND KWTX d b a AGUILERA, v. COX TEXAS PUBLICATIONS, INC. KWTX d b a, 936 F. Supp. 392 (W.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . electronic surveillance or physically interfering with a search or seizure); and Texas Penal Code § 38.05 . . .

L. BARBER, v., 562 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . be made, it is by its terms confined to disqualification for consanguinity under sections 38.02 and 38.05 . . .

ST. GEORGE ISLAND, LTD. a v. A. RUDD,, 547 So. 2d 958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Disqualifications pursuant to sections 38.10, 38.05, and Rule 1.432, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure . . . disqualified himself in related cases, including this one, apparently on his own motion, see section 38.05 . . .

MARGULIES, v. Z. MARGULIES,, 528 So. 2d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 38.05, Florida Statutes (1987), authorizes a judge to disqualify himself where, to his knowledge . . .

W. FOLMAR, v. AMERICAN HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, W. FOLMAR, v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY,, 91 F.R.D. 22 (E.D. Tenn. 1981)

. . . . * * * ” Rule 38.05, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. . “ * * * The framers of Rule 81(c), taking . . .

McBRIDE, v. W. J. ESTELLE,, 507 F.2d 903 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . At the very most, appellant has shown the Judge may have infringed upon Art. 38.05, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Code . . .

P. P. Jr. K. v., 54 T.C. 420 (T.C. 1970)

. . . In Gallagher, a substantial (38.05 percent) minority interest left the corporate enterprise, and a substantial . . .

M. BRYANT, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a M. BRYANT, v. CONNECTICUT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 407 F.2d 576 (4th Cir. 1969)

. . . See, generally, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶[¶[ 38.05, 38.08 [5] and cases cited therein. . . .

G. v., 42 T.C. 558 (T.C. 1964)

. . . There, the owners of 38.05 percent of the stock of the old company did not acquire any interest whatever . . .

S. A. HIRSH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. CHILDS, d. b. a., 157 F. Supp. 183 (W.D. Pa. 1957)

. . . Vol. 10, Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, § 38.05, p. 351 (3rd Ed.) . . .

In CONSOLIDATION COAL CO., 11 F. Supp. 594 (D. Md. 1935)

. . . . : 38.05 1. e., the common stock must sell for $38.05 per share, in order that the refunding bondholder . . .

PEOPLE S LOAN INVESTMENT CO. v. UNIVERSAL CREDIT CO., 75 F.2d 545 (8th Cir. 1935)

. . . Cashier (Official Title) 38.05 Trust Receipt Received of Universal Credit Company the Motor Vehicles . . .

ST. LOUIS- SAN FRANCISCO RY. CO. v. ALABAMA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, 27 F.2d 893 (M.D. Ala. 1928)

. . . Allen, state $11.26, interstate, nothing; Bazemore, state $16.07, interstate $10.55; Eldridge, state $38.05 . . .

SECURITY BANK TRUST CO. v. TARLTON, 294 F. 698 (W.D. Tenn. 1923)

. . . Bryan for attorney’s fees; $38.05 to the Independent Tire Company of Memphis,, incurred in the months . . .

MATTIE W. JACKSON, WIDOW, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 47 Ct. Cl. 579 (Ct. Cl. 1912)

. . . 40.55 1878. 37.04 38.75 35.80 40.95 39.2 1879. 36.50 37.25 36.0 39.45 36.8 35.90 1880. 44.60 43.70 38.05 . . .

GEORGE F. ARCHER AND KATE C. ARCHER v. THE UNITED STATES, 47 Ct. Cl. 248 (Ct. Cl. 1912)

. . . 135.0 1899.. 43.00 140.1 1878. 35.80 135.0 1900.. 33.75 130.8 1879. 86.00 135.2 1901.. 134.4 1880_ 38.05 . . . 138.8 1904.. 43.55 1883. 40.40 157.5 1905.. 36.80 133.9 1884. 41.10 138.2 1906.. 44.90 142.0 1885. 38.05 . . .

In MANDEL, 127 F. 863 (S.D.N.Y. 1903)

. . . commissioner’s fees in this reference, amounting to $75, and the stenographer’s fees, amounting to $38.05 . . .