The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 38
JUDGES: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 38.12

38.12 Resignation, death, or removal of judges; disposition of pending matters and papers.—Upon the resignation, death, or impeachment of any judge, all matters pending before that judge shall be heard and determined by the judge’s successor, and parties making any motion before such judge shall suffer no detriment by reason of his or her resignation, death, or impeachment. All judges, upon resignation or impeachment, shall file all papers pending before them with the clerk of the court in which the cause is pending; and the executor or administrator of any judge who dies pending any matter before him or her shall file all papers found among the papers of his or her intestate or testator with the said clerk.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 3007, 1877; RS 971, 972; GS 1341, 1342; RGS 2529, 2530; CGL 4156, 4157; s. 4, ch. 73-334; s. 1331, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 38.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 38.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 38.12

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 38.12

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 38.12.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. A. GOLDSTONE G. III E., 233 F. Supp. 3d 1169 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . but is in essence withdrawing the case from the jury’s consideration. 8 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.12 . . . right to a jury trial in an action at law, but not to a jury verdict.” 8 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.12 . . . the Constitution when there is no fact issue for the jury to decide.” 8 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.12 . . .

SULLO BOBBITT P. L. L. C. L. v. ABBOTT,, 536 F. App'x 473 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 38.12(d)(2)(C). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.12(d)(2)(A), (C); Moore v. Morales, 843 F.Supp. 1124, 1133 (S.D.Tex.1994). . . . See § 38.12(d)(2)(C). That is the only portion of the statute at issue here. . . . While this appeal was pending, the Texas legislature repealed Section 38.12(d)(2)(C), effective September . . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.12(d)(2)(A)). . . .

SILVERSTRAND INVESTMENTS v. AMAG PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. J. G. M. D. A. V. M. D. J. P M. D. S. Co. J. P. LLC Co. LLC W. Co., 707 F.3d 95 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . AMAG’s shares closed at $38.12 after the issuance of the report. . . .

McKINLEY, D. C. v. ABBOTT,, 643 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Section 38.12 of the Texas Penal Code (the “Barratry Statute”) regulates barratry . . . Appellees brought suit seeking a declaratory judgment that Texas Penal Code §§ 38.12(d)(2)(A) and 38.12 . . . After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for the Appellees, holding unconstitutional § 38.12 . . . (d)(2)(A) as applied to written solicitations, in-person, and telephonic solicitation, and § 38.12(d) . . . Penal Code § 38.12(d)(1). . § 38.12(d)(2). . Moore v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COUSINS,, 291 F. App'x 497 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . Waynesboro, Va., Code § 38.12(7)(d), (f) (2004). . . .

J. CROOK, v. EL PASO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 277 F. App'x 477 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 38.12(i) (Vernon 2007). . LeMaire v. La. . . .

BAILEY, D. C. D. C. D. C. v. MORALES,, 190 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.12(1)(2)) (Vernon’s, WESTLAW through TXLEGIS 750 (1997)). . . . Penal Code Ann. §§ 38.12(a)(3),(4)); see also id. (amending Tex. . . . . §§ 38.12(b)(1),(2)) ("A person commits an offense if the person: (1) is ... . . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.12(b)(3)). . . . . If the chiropractor pays the employer, then the conduct clearly violates § 38.12(a)(4). . . .

In NICE SYSTEMS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 188 F.R.D. 206 (D.N.J. 1999)

. . . Laser sold 200 Nice ADSs for $39.50 per share on 11 May 1998, 300 Nice ADSs for $38.12 per share on 20 . . .

RINGLING BROS. BARNUM BAILEY COMBINED SHOWS, INCORPORATED, v. UTAH DIVISION OF TRAVEL DEVELOPMENT,, 170 F.3d 449 (4th Cir. 1999)

. . . infringed by a proper disposition of the issue by summary judgment, see Moore’s Federal Practice, § 38.12 . . .

UNITED STATES v. B. ALLEN,, 106 F.3d 695 (6th Cir. 1997)

. . . Accordingly, Allen tendered $38.12 for one night’s lodging, plus a $20.00 deposit for any telephone charges . . .

DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD. v. CITY OF MONTEREY, DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD. v. CITY OF MONTEREY,, 95 F.3d 1422 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶¶38.12[5], 38.32[1] (2d ed. 1995). . . .

OCASO, S. A. COMPA IA DE SEGUROS Y REASEGUROS, v. PUERTO RICO MARITIME SHIPPING AUTHORITY,, 915 F. Supp. 1244 (D.P.R. 1996)

. . . the evidence is conflicting, as is the question whether disclosures were full and truthful. 9 Couch § 38.12 . . .

MOORE, v. MORALES, ANDERSON, v. B. HOLMES, Jr. DIRECT MAIL MARKETING, INC. v. VANCE, INNOVATIVE DATABASE SYSTEMS, v. MORALES, O. CHAMBERS, v. HILBIG,, 63 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 1995)

. . . licensed, certified, or registered by a health care regulatory agency of this state”), TexJPenal Code § 38.12 . . . Tex.Penal Code § 38.12(b)(1) (1994). . . . See Tex.Penal Code § 38.12(d)(2)(A) (1994). A. . . .

TEXANS AGAINST CENSORSHIP, INC. v. STATE BAR OF TEXAS, A., 888 F. Supp. 1328 (E.D. Tex. 1995)

. . . (this instruction was attached to legislation amending the Texas barratry statute, Tex.Penal Code § 38.12 . . .

KELLEY, v. STATE, 637 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 38.12, Florida Statutes (1991), explicitly provides: “Upon the resignation, death, or impeachment . . .

MOORE, v. MORALES,, 843 F. Supp. 1124 (S.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . . §§ 38.12(d)(2)(A), (B), (C), & (D) and 38.12(e), and Tex.Rev.Civ.StAt.Ann. art. 6701d § 47(a), (b), . . . does not desire to be contacted by persons seeking professional employment____” Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 38.12 . . . contacted by persons seeking to obtain professional employment as a professional described by Section 38.12 . . . Due to such ruling, TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.12(e), was thereby rendered unenforceable. . . . . § 38.12(e) is also unconstitutional and defendants and their agents are enjoined from enforcing this . . .

WISE, v. P. POPOFF, 835 F. Supp. 977 (E.D. Mich. 1993)

. . . maximum amount of notice and administrative costs and fees were used, the loss per share would equal only 38.12 . . .

BRADLEY v. PITTSBURGH BOARD OF EDUCATION, C. B. K. BRADLEY, 913 F.2d 1064 (3d Cir. 1990)

. . . ’s illness is such that appearance would be life threatening. 7 Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d § 38.12 . . .

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY,, 895 F.2d 152 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . Proposal 38.12 After a RIF has been directed or approved by higher authority and until the RIF is consummated . . .

BAILEY, v. GRAND TRUNK LINES NEW ENGLAND, St., 805 F.2d 1097 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.12[6], at 38-125 (1985) (the right to a jury trial in an FELA action . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 28.09 20.59 15.67 37.86 39.15 26.97 34.94 27.31 16.67 18.16 37.02 26.38 22.61 30.57 20.64 14.71 33.60 38.12 . . .

In H. SAUER, A. d b a C J QUALITY PLUMBING HEATING CO. INC. v. H. SAUER A. d b a C J, 41 B.R. 483 (Bank. W.D. Wis. 1984)

. . . That, on September 11, 1979, the Debtors purchased a $38.12 piece of equipment from Quality. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ONE MERCEDES BENZ SERIAL NO. No. R., 618 F.2d 453 (7th Cir. 1980)

. . . his familiar treatise Moore’s Federal Practice (2nd ed. 1948, looseleaf pages 1979) vol. 5, paragraph 38.12 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. B. WILLIAMS COMPANY, INC., 498 F.2d 414 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . See 5 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 38.12, at 128.25 & n. 10 (1971). . . .

KELLY T. v. ARMBRUST a k a, 351 F. Supp. 869 (D.N.D. 1972)

. . . .) ¶ 38.11, 38.12. The Supreme Court’s position was illustrated by Mr. . . .

ROGERS, v. LOETHER, 467 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir. 1972)

. . . Moore, 318 U.S. 133, 153, 63 S.Ct. 499, 87 L.Ed. 663; 5 Moore’s Federal Practice H 38.12 [7], subdivision . . .

MANILOW, v. UNITED STATES, 315 F. Supp. 28 (N.D. Ill. 1970)

. . . See 7 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 38.12 (1967), and cases cited therein. . . .

GLAZER, v. S. GLAZER A. S. GLAZER A. v. GLAZER,, 374 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1967)

. . . As a result, Guilford’s interest in Glazer Steel increased to 38.12 per cent; Jerome’s and Louis’s each . . .

F. BRADFORD, a a v. FOUNDATION MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a, 182 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . The appellee argues that Sections 26.19 and 38.12, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., govern the outcome of this . . . Section 38.12 states, in pertinent part: “Upon the resignation, death or impeachment of any judge, all . . .

MARINA MERCANTE NICARAGUENSE, S. A. MOTOR VESSEL, EL SALVADOR, a McALLISTER BROTHERS, INC. TUG RUSSELL NO., 248 F. Supp. 15 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)

. . . His life expectancy was 42.85 years and his wife’s, 48.55; their joint life expectancy was 38.12 years . . . The joint expectancy of decedent and his wife was 38.12 years. . . .

HINDES v. UNITED STATES, 246 F. Supp. 147 (W.D. Tex. 1965)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, Vol. 7, Section 38.12. . . . .

K. ROSS, G. H. v. UNITED STATES, 348 F.2d 577 (5th Cir. 1965)

. . . Robertson, W.D.N.C.1951, 98 F.Supp. 331; 5 Mer-tens, Law of Federal Gift and Estate Taxation § 38.12 . . .

A. HAIN, v. UNITED STATES, 219 F. Supp. 257 (D. Minn. 1963)

. . . Plaintiff’s life expectancy is 38.12 years. . . .

HABERMAN FARMS, INC. v. UNITED STATES HABERMAN H. v. UNITED STATES HABERMAN v. UNITED STATES, 305 F.2d 787 (8th Cir. 1962)

. . . .-07, 38.10, 38.12. Compare James Realty Co. v. . . .

SCOTT PAPER COMPANY, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 301 F.2d 579 (3d Cir. 1962)

. . . Toilet Tissue 8,830 12,702 11.84 13.12 All Paper Towels 61,479 113,879 22.98 30.89 Resale 31,166 75,033 38.12 . . .

BARRETT, v. UNITED STATES, 270 F.2d 772 (8th Cir. 1959)

. . . . § 4742, of 38.12 grains of marijuana to one Henry L. McDuffie. . . . he was sentenced, charged that on or about the 14th day of January, 1958, the appellant did transfer 38.12 . . .

H. HOLLANDER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 124 F. Supp. 177 (D. Mass. 1954)

. . . . § 3655(b), and delinquency interest of $38.12, making the total claim $3757.-57. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. ANDERSON, 95 F.2d 577 (9th Cir. 1938)

. . . His expectancy at the time of the accident was 38.12 years, he being at that time 26 years old. . . .

Co. v., 8 B.T.A. 1138 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . whereas petitioner asserts that the prior preference stock was worth $74.50 a share and the common stock $38.12% . . .

BRAUN v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF BENTON COUNTY, 66 F. 476 (C.C.D. Ind. 1895)

. . . the completion of the road, without any notice to. the plaintiff, an additional tax, amounting to $38.12 . . .