Cases from cite.case.law:

FLOOD, v. K. STUMM,, 989 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 39.204, Florida Statutes, provides that privileged communication between a professional and a . . .

DOHERTY, v. JOHN DOE NO., 957 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . In arguing for abrogation of the privilege in this case, Plaintiffs relied upon section 39.204, Florida . . .

NUSSBAUMER, Jr. v. STATE, 882 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . of the fact that Defendant is charged with lewd molestation (pursuant to [section 800.04]), [section 39.204 . . . With the exceptions of the attorney-client privilege and the clergy communications privilege, section 39.204 . . . Section 39.204 provides as follows: The privileged quality of communication between husband and wife . . . evidentiary privileges in cases involving child abuse, abandonment, or neglect provided for in section 39.204 . . . The exception to the abrogation of the evidentiary privileges in section 39.204 for clergy communications . . .

HILL, v. STATE, 846 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The state relies on section 39.204, which it claims completely abrogates the Evidence Code privileges . . . asserted the psychotherapist privilege and the marital communications privilege are waived by section 39.204 . . . The trial judge primarily relied on section 39.204 as having abrogated the marital communication privilege . . . This privilege is “abrogated” by section 39.204 in cases involving child abuse, abandonment, or neglect . . . Because of the clear statutory language in both section 39.204, and section 827.03(b)(3), we agree with . . .

S. C. a v. GUARDIAN AD LITEM,, 845 So. 2d 953 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . her privilege or placed her mental health in issue, nor has the privilege been abrogated by section 39.204 . . . Section 39.204, Florida Statutes, provides, in pertinent part: "The privileged quality of communication . . . perpetrator in any situation involving known or suspected child abuse, abandonment, or neglect....” § 39.204 . . .

WESTERHEIDE, v. STATE, 831 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2002)

. . . See § 39.204, Fla. . . .

HOME MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 639 F.2d 333 (7th Cir. 1980)

. . . Treas.Reg. 111, § 29.204-2, 1944 C.B. 336-37 (recodified as Treas.Reg. 118, § 39.204-2(a) & (b), 26 C.F.R . . . . § 39.204-2(a) & (b) (1953 ed.) by Revenue Ruling 53-226, 1953-2 C.B. 500); see also Treas.Reg. § 1.832 . . .