Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 39.6013 (2025)

Case plan amendments.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
39.6013 Case plan amendments.
(1) After the case plan has been developed under s. 39.6011, the tasks and services agreed upon in the plan may not be changed or altered in any way except as provided in this section.
(2) The case plan may be amended at any time in order to change the goal of the plan, employ the use of concurrent planning, add or remove tasks the parent must complete to substantially comply with the plan, provide appropriate services for the child, and update the child’s health, mental health, and education records required by s. 39.6012.
(3) The case plan may be amended upon approval of the court if all parties are in agreement regarding the amendments to the plan and the amended plan is signed by all parties and submitted to the court with a memorandum of explanation.
(4) The case plan may be amended by the court or upon motion of any party at any hearing to change the goal of the plan, employ the use of concurrent planning, or add or remove tasks the parent must complete in order to substantially comply with the plan if there is a preponderance of evidence demonstrating the need for the amendment. The need to amend the case plan may be based on information discovered or circumstances arising after the approval of the case plan for:
(a) A previously unaddressed condition that, without services, may prevent the child from safely returning to the home or may prevent the child from safely remaining in the home;
(b) The child’s need for permanency, taking into consideration the child’s age and developmental needs;
(c) The failure of a party to substantially comply with a task in the original case plan, including the ineffectiveness of a previously offered service; or
(d) An error or oversight in the case plan.
(5) The case plan may be amended by the court or upon motion of any party at any hearing to provide appropriate services to the child if there is competent evidence demonstrating the need for the amendment. The reason for amending the case plan may be based on information discovered or circumstances arising after the approval of the case plan regarding the provision of safe and proper care to the child.
(6) When determining whether to amend the case plan, the court must consider the length of time the case has been open, the level of parental engagement to date, the number of case plan tasks completed, the child’s type of placement and attachment, and the potential for successful reunification.
(7) The case plan is deemed amended as to the child’s health, mental health, and education records required by s. 39.6012 when the child’s updated health and education records are filed by the department under s. 39.701(2)(a).
(8) Amendments must include service interventions that are the least intrusive into the life of the parent and child, must focus on clearly defined objectives, and must provide the most efficient path to quick reunification or permanent placement given the circumstances of the case and the child’s need for safe and proper care. A copy of the amended plan must be immediately given to the persons identified in s. 39.6011(7)(c).
History.s. 17, ch. 2006-86; s. 3, ch. 2007-5; s. 12, ch. 2009-43; s. 3, ch. 2013-178; s. 7, ch. 2018-103; s. 9, ch. 2019-128.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 2007–2018 · leading case: KE v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 958 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).
KE v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 958 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). · cites it 10× “§ 39.6013, Fla. Stat. (2005). A case plan is not required to have a goal of reunifying a child with the parent from whom the child was removed.”
RN v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 25 So. 3d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). · cites it 5× “The new rule was adopted in response to the Legislature’s enactment of section 39.6013, Florida Statutes (2006).”
RH v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 948 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 39.6013, Fla. Stat. (2005). A case plan is not required to have a goal of reunifying a child with the parent from whom the child was removed.”
A.L. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 53 So. 3d 324 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). · cites it 2× “Where the offending parent has not yet substantially complied with the case plan and the time for such compliance has not expired, if a party or the court concludes that reunification with the offending parent would no longer be appropriate, the proper procedure is to amend the…”
MI v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 45 So. 3d 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). · cites it 3× “However, section 39.6013, Florida Statutes (2009) expressly allows the amendment of case plan goals by the court at any time: (2) The case plan may be amended at any time in order to change the goal of the plan.”
Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs. v. ML, 984 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). · cites it 3× “See § 39.6013, Fla. Stat. (2007). We disagree.”
J.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 136 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). “We note that the case plan may of course be amended pursuant to section 39.6013 and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.”
M.B.W. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 163 So. 3d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). · cites it 2× “2d DCA 2014) (granting the petition for writ of certiorari in part where the trial court sua sponte amended the case plan absent the requisite evidentiary showing pursuant to section 39.6013, Florida Statutes). As such, we affirm the adjudication of dependency, but we reverse…”
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juv. Procedure - 2018 Fast-Track Report, 249 So. 3d 1175 (Fla. 2018). · cites it 3× “(adding subsection (6) to § 39.6013, Fla. Stat. (2017) ). New subdivision (b)(6) is added to rule 8.”
Florida Dep't of Child. & Families v. N.H., 174 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). · cites it 2× “Section 39.6013, Florida Statutes (2015), authorizes the amendment of a case plan by the court or by agreement of all parties when certain conditions have occurred, and only in those circumstances.”
M.P., the father v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 159 So. 3d 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). “be amended pursuant to section 39.6013 and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.”
— 39.6013(1) — 1 case
KE v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 958 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). “§ 39.6013, Fla. Stat. (2005). A case plan is not required to have a goal of reunifying a child with the parent from whom the child was removed.”
— 39.6013(2) — 1 case
KE v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 958 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). “§ 39.6013, Fla. Stat. (2005). A case plan is not required to have a goal of reunifying a child with the parent from whom the child was removed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

This Florida statute resource is curated by Florida Bar member Graham W. Syfert, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.