Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 44.201 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 44.201 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 44.201 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 44.201

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 44
MEDIATION ALTERNATIVES TO JUDICIAL ACTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 44.201
44.201 Citizen Dispute Settlement Centers; establishment; operation; confidentiality.
(1) The chief judge of a judicial circuit, after consultation with the board of county commissioners of a county or with two or more boards of county commissioners of counties within the judicial circuit, may establish a Citizen Dispute Settlement Center for such county or counties, with the approval of the Chief Justice.
(2)(a) Each Citizen Dispute Settlement Center shall be administered in accordance with rules adopted by a council composed of at least seven members. The chief judge of the judicial circuit shall serve as chair of the council and shall appoint the other members of the council. The membership of the council shall include a representative of the state attorney, each sheriff, a county court judge, and each board of county commissioners within the geographical jurisdiction of the center. In addition, council membership shall include two members of the general public who are not representatives of such officers or boards. The membership of the council also may include other interested persons.
(b) The council shall establish qualifications for and appoint a director of the center. The director shall administer the operations of the center.
(c) A council may seek and accept contributions from counties and municipalities within the geographical jurisdiction of the Citizen Dispute Settlement Center and from agencies of the Federal Government, private sources, and other available funds and may expend such funds to carry out the purposes of this section.
(3) The Citizen Dispute Settlement Center, subject to the approval of the council and the Chief Justice, shall formulate and implement a plan for creating an informal forum for the mediation and settlement of disputes. Such plan shall prescribe:
(a) Objectives and purposes of the center;
(b) Procedures for filing complaints with the center and for scheduling informal mediation sessions with the parties to a complaint;
(c) Screening procedures to ensure that each dispute mediated by the center meets the criteria of fitness for mediation as set by the council;
(d) Procedures for rejecting any dispute which does not meet the established criteria of fitness for mediation;
(e) Procedures for giving notice of the time, place, and nature of the mediation session to the parties and for conducting mediation sessions;
(f) Procedures to ensure that participation by all parties is voluntary; and
(g) Procedures by which any dispute that was referred to the center by a law enforcement agency, state attorney, court, or other agency and that fails at mediation, or that reaches settlement that is later breached, is reported to the referring agency.
(4)(a) Each mediation session conducted by a Citizen Dispute Settlement Center shall be nonjudicial and informal. No adjudication, sanction, or penalty may be made or imposed by the mediator or the center.
(b) A Citizen Dispute Settlement Center may refer the parties to judicial or nonjudicial supportive service agencies.
(5) Any information relating to a dispute obtained by any person while performing any duties for the center from the files, reports, case summaries, mediator’s notes, or other communications or materials is exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1).
(6) No officer, council member, employee, volunteer, or agent of a Citizen Dispute Settlement Center shall be held liable for civil damages for any act or omission in the scope of employment or function, unless such person acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of the rights, safety, or property of another.
(7) Any Citizen Dispute Settlement Center in operation on October 1, 1985, may continue its operations in its current form with the approval of the chief judge of the judicial circuit in which such center is located, except that paragraph (4)(b) and subsections (5) and (6) shall apply to such centers.
(8) Any utility regulated by the Florida Public Service Commission is excluded from the provisions of this act.
History.s. 2, ch. 85-228; s. 16, ch. 90-360; s. 263, ch. 95-147; s. 19, ch. 96-406; s. 3, ch. 2004-291.

F.S. 44.201 on Google Scholar

F.S. 44.201 on CourtListener

Amendments to 44.201


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 44.201

Total Results: 3

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. v. Swindal

622 So. 2d 467, 1993 WL 241027

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1993 | Docket: 1328220

Cited 74 times | Published

competent testimony since the incident. [4] See § 44.201, Fla. Stat. (1987). [5] The court noted that

Swindal v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company

599 So. 2d 1314, 1992 WL 72015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1992 | Docket: 411830

Cited 8 times | Published

Castellano, 571 So.2d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). [2] § 44.201, Fla. Stat. (1987). [3] We note that the version

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 14, 1993 | Docket: 3256991

Published

Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tjw 1 Section 44.201(2), F.S. The chief judge is responsible for