Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 46.051 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 46.051 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 46.051 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 46.051

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 46
PARTIES
View Entire Chapter
46.051 Joinder of products liability insurers.
(1) No products liability insurer shall be joined as a party defendant in an action to determine the insured’s liability. However, each insurer which does or may provide products liability insurance coverage to pay all or a portion of any judgment which might be entered in the action shall file with the court, under oath, a statement by a corporate officer setting forth the following information with regard to each known policy of insurance:
(a) The name of the insurer;
(b) The name of each insured;
(c) The limits of liability coverage; and
(d) A statement of any policy or coverage defense which said insurer reasonably believes is available to the insurer filing the statement at the time of filing.
(2) The statement required by subsection (1) shall be amended immediately upon discovery of facts calling for an amendment to such statement.
(3) If the statement or any amendment thereto indicates that a policy or coverage defense has been or will be asserted, then the insurer may be joined as a party.
(4) After the rendition of a verdict, or final judgment by the court if the case is tried without a jury, the insurer may be joined as a party and judgment may be entered by the court based upon the statement or statements herein required.
(5) The rules of discovery shall be available to discover the existence of liability insurance coverage and its provisions.
(6) This act is applicable to products liability actions based on either tort or contract causes of action.
History.ss. 2, 3, ch. 78-418; s. 5, ch. 2000-336.

F.S. 46.051 on Google Scholar

F.S. 46.051 on CourtListener

Amendments to 46.051


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 46.051

Total Results: 2  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Robinson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 583 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6175, 1991 WL 117041

...The court did not expressly classify an "excess case" as either tort or contract. [1] Vanguard Ins. Co. v. Townsend, 544 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). [2] § 86.101 Fla. Stat. (1989). [3] See, e.g., Clemmons v. American States Ins. Co., 412 So.2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). [4] § 627.7262, Fla. Stat. (1989). [5] § 46.051(3), Fla....
Copy

Lane v. Lodal, Inc., 474 So. 2d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2009

SHARP, Judge. The constitutionality of section 46.051, Florida Statutes (1983), is at issue in this case. The statute provides, in relevant part, “No products liability insurer shall be joined as a party defendant in an action to determine the insured’s liability.” 1 Pursu *414 ant to section 46.051, the trial court struck as a party defendant in this case the insurer of one of the defendants, Lodal, Inc. Because we find section 46.051 is unconstitutional as violative of Article II, section 3 of the Florida Constitution, 2 the striking of the insurer was erroneous, and therefore we reverse for a new trial....
...(the truck’s manufacturer), and Centaur Insurance Company (Lodal’s insurer). Over the plaintiff’s constitutional challenge of the statute, the trial court granted Centaur’s motion to strike. The case proceeded to jury trial without Centaur and resulted in a verdict absolving Lodal of any negligence. 3 Section 46.051 is the third of a trilogy of nonjoinder statutes....
...ve date of October 1, 1982. VanBibber v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Insurance Co.; Beaupre v. Testa, 449 So.2d 311 (Fla.2d DCA), rev. denied, 456 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1984); Salyer v. Gainesville Dodge, Inc., 448 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). *415 Section 46.051 is indistinguishable from the nonjoinder statutes found constitutionally defective in Markert v. Johnston and Cozine v. Tullo. It too merely dictates the procedure for joining parties. It does not create or condition the arising of a cause of action against a products liability insurer. Thus, section 46.051 is unconstitutional and the trial court erred in relying upon it to dismiss the liability insurer....
...The Fourth District reversed for a new trial stating, “It was appellant’s right to join the insurer as a party and we do not know how one would articulate prejudice under the circumstances of this case.” 458 So.2d at 863 . Accordingly, we hold that section 46.051, Florida Statutes (1983) is unconstitutional as an infringement upon the court’s rule-making authority....
...Therefore, the trial court erred by striking Lodal Inc.’s insurer as a party defendant. We remand for a new trial with Centaur Insurance Company joined as a party defendant. REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL. DAUKSCH, J., and BOARDMAN, E.F., Associate Judge, concur. . In its entirety, section 46.051, Florida Statutes (1983) provides: Joinder of products liability insurers....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.