Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 55.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 55.04 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 55.04

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 55
JUDGMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 55.04
55.04 Judgments; rate of interest, bonds of county, etc.All judgments and decrees rendered on any bonds or other written evidence of debt of any county, special road and bridge districts or any county for the use and benefit of any special road and bridge districts or incorporated city or town or taxing district bear interest at the rate of 5 percent a year. When a judgment or decree is rendered on a bond or other written evidence of debt providing for a lesser rate of interest, the judgment or decree bears interest at the rate specified in such bond or other written evidence of debt.
History.s. 1, ch. 16835, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4493(1); s. 9, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 55.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 55.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 55.04


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 55.04
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 55.04.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CHARTER SCHOOLS USA, INC. v. JOHN DOE NO., 152 So. 3d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Chapter 55 uses the term “rendition” only twice, once in section 55.04 which deals with the interest . . . sheds no light whatsoever on when a judgment creditor may execute on a signed order or judgment; see § 55.04 . . . Section 55.04, relating to judgments enforcing municipal bond obligations, uses the term “rendered” to . . .

EQUITY IN ATHLETICS, INCORPORATED, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION E. T. T. F. C. J. H. Jr. R. B. Jr. M. H. M. K. II, V. D. Jr., 639 F.3d 91 (4th Cir. 2011)

. . . actual number of female athletes (240) and not female athletic slots (320), female athletes represented 55.04% . . . J.A. 311. 55.04% — 50.94% = 4.10%. . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY, v. L. STRICKLAND,, 604 F. Supp. 2d 805 (D.S.C. 2009)

. . . Ralph, 382 F.3d 1374 (Fed.Cir.2004), affirmed a jury verdict that awarded Monsanto $55.04/unit for the . . . The $55.04/unit award was based upon infringing activity in 1999, six years prior to Defendant's infringement . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY, LLC, v. DAVID,, 516 F.3d 1009 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . He also claims that the reasonable royalty awarded for each unit ($55.04) was not supported by the evidence . . . The district court, however, relying on this court’s decision in Ralph, awarded a $55.04 royalty instead . . . Furthermore, we do not see how the court’s reduction of the royalty from $66.00 to $55.04 implicates . . . We therefore uphold the district court’s finding of a royalty of $55.04 per unit. . . . Multiplying that number by the reasonable royalty ($55.04/bag), the court obtained the final damage figure . . .

ARMITAGE v. DOLPHIN PLUMBING MECHANICAL, LLC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 763 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . $ 600.00 $ 6.25 $ 50.00 November 7, 2002 255.00 $ 2.66 $ 21.28 November 14, 2002 660.00 $ $ 6.88 $ 55.04 . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY LLC v. DAVID,, 448 F. Supp. 2d 1095 (E.D. Mo. 2006)

. . . Reduction of Royalty Defendant also asks the Court to reduce the award of $55.04 per bag of saved soybean . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY LLC v. DAVID,, 448 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (E.D. Mo. 2006)

. . . As such, Monsanto is entitled to a reasonable royalty of $55.04/bag. . . . Therefore, a total of 4,110 pounds of infringing seed multiplied by 55.04 per bag results in a reasonable . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY, v. L. RALPH,, 382 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

. . . verdict for Monsanto for what it deemed to be a reasonable royalty for Ralph’s infringement, viz., $55.04 . . . Counsel for Monsanto also asserted during oral argument that the assessed $55.04/bag and $52.12/bag reasonable . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. RAY,, 375 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . Singer, Statutes And Statutory Construction 388, § 55.04 (6th ed.2000). . . . Singer, Statutes and Statutory Construction 388, § 55.04 (6th ed.2000). . . .

GEORGIA, v. ASHCROFT,, 204 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . , the BVAP in Senate District 12 would remain practically the same, decreasing 0.39% from 55.43% to 55.04% . . .

PATRAY, v. NORTHWEST PUBLISHING, INC., 931 F. Supp. 865 (S.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . . ¶ 55.04 (those conditions are that the claim must be for a sum certain, upon the failure to appear . . . , though apparently only for the liquidated damages portion of his complaint. 6 Moore's Fed.Prac. ¶ 55.04 . . .

J. TAYLOR M. v. CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA DRUG AND ALCOHOL SERVICES CORPORATION L., 890 F. Supp. 360 (M.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . $21,915.14) + (20/30 x 1/12 x $23,010.90) Interest from 5/1/92 to 9/30/92 @ 7% .07 x 5/12 x $1,887.13 $ 55.04 . . .

M. C. JEFFERS, Al M. J. C. T. E. v. TUCKER, In As W. J. In As In As, 847 F. Supp. 655 (E.D. Ark. 1994)

. . . .-67%; HD 72: 55.04%; HD 74: 58.61%; HD 75: 55.24% (black incumbent). . . .

In SKIL- AIRE CORP. P. MICHAELS, v. W. LOMAX, H. E., 142 B.R. 692 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1992)

. . . Sutherland, supra, at § 55.04. . . .

GROWERS PACKING COMPANY, v. COMMUNITY BANK OF HOMESTEAD,, 134 B.R. 438 (S.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . . § 55.04 (1984)). See also Blum v. . . .

In GOLD SEAL PRODUCTS CO. INC. H. L. RABURN CO., 128 B.R. 822 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . $30,393.75 The total amount claimed, $30,393.75, divided by the total number of hours, 552.25, equals a $55.04 . . . finds a deduction of five (5) percent of the total hours expended, or 27.61 hours, which multiplied by $55.04 . . . the “lumped” hours claimed or a total of 12.81 hours, which multiplied by the average hourly rate of $55.04 . . . leaves an excess time for review of 27.05 hours, which when multiplied by the average hourly rate of $55.04 . . . This time is 57.75 hours, which multiplied by $55.04 equals $3,178.56. . . .

In UNITED MISSOURI BANK OF KANSAS CITY, N. A., 901 F.2d 1449 (8th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 55.04 (1984); see also Phelps Dodge Corp. v. . . .

In UNITED MISSOURI BANK OF KANSAS CITY, N. A., 901 F.2d 1449 (8th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 55.04 (1984); see also Phelps Dodge Corp. v. . . .

ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROAD COMPANY, v. D. BAIR,, 626 F. Supp. 747 (S.D. Iowa 1985)

. . . to valuation and assessment by the Director was composed of 44.96% real property, or $6,858,198, and 55.04% . . . Iowa 1. 1983 Assessment (Before Equalization) $15,254,000 Personal Property % (See Attached Exhibit) 55.04% . . . Account 45) 1,712 1,792 (80) 0.0 TOTAL PERSONALTY $ 1,198,476 $ 305,081 $ 893,395 PERSONAL PROPERTY 55.04 . . .

BYRD v. KEENE CORPORATION v. CAPE INDUSTRIES, LTD., 104 F.R.D. 10 (E.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 55.04 (2d ed. 1984). . . .

In LITTENSTEIN LITTENSTEIN v. N. DORCICH, N. N. a S., 35 B.R. 123 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1983)

. . . Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir.1980); 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶¶ 55.04, 55.05[2] (1983). . . .

STATE SOUTH DAKOTA, v. ADAMS, U. S. M., 587 F.2d 915 (8th Cir. 1978)

. . . See also 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction § 55.04 (4th ed. 1973). . . .

GRAVES v. BARNES REGESTER v. BULLOCK MARRIOTT v. SMITH, ARCHER v. SMITH A. ESCALANTE v. WHITE GASKIN v. WHITE L. CHAPMAN v. W. WHITE, Jr., 446 F. Supp. 560 (W.D. Tex. 1977)

. . . That part of Tarrant County included in census tracts 42.02, 54.01, 54.02, 55.01, 55.02, 55.03, 55.04 . . .

E. BAKER v. REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO., 432 F. Supp. 535 (D. Conn. 1977)

. . . In 1972-73 Orange contributed 55.04% of the total school budget; Bethany contributed 15.62%; and Woodbridge . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. SILVERNAIL, Jr. XXX XX XXXX E- U. S., 1 M.J. 945 (N.M.C.M.R. 1976)

. . . . § 55.04. . . .

LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS v. CITY OF SANTA ANA, a, 410 F. Supp. 873 (C.D. Cal. 1976)

. . . 66.15 SRA Pictorial 58.98 57.18 1973 Form 45 49.90 38.64 1974 Form 45 49.08 38.93 SRA Pictorial 58.91 55.04 . . .

E. BAKER S. v. REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. M. SCOTT, Sr. v. NONNEWAUG REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO., 520 F.2d 799 (2d Cir. 1975)

. . . Orange contributed in 1972 — 73 55.04 per cent of the total school budget, with Bethany’s share amounting . . .

R. FINCH v. BIG CHIEF DRILLING COMPANY, 56 F.R.D. 456 (E.D. Tex. 1972)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 55.04, at 1812 (2d ed. 1966). (Emphasis added.) . . .

OHIO LIME COMPANY, a v. UNITED STATES, 219 F. Supp. 146 (N.D. Ohio 1963)

. . . quarry, which is quite uniform in its characteristics and is as follows: «* * * “Calcium Carbonate 55.04 . . .

LIFE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF TENNESSEE, v. W. GURLEY,, 229 F.2d 326 (4th Cir. 1956)

. . . receipt to be countersigned by agent Ware and a voucher for commissions showing Ware’s commissions were $55.04 . . .

V. GURLEY, v. LIFE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF TENNESSEE,, 132 F. Supp. 289 (M.D.N.C. 1955)

. . . receipt to be countersigned by agent Ware and a voucher for commissions showing Ware’s commissions were $55.04 . . . deliver, the officially executed receipt and the voucher to be signed by Ware for his commissions of $55.04 . . .

v. AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION, 51 F. Supp. 462 (D. Del. 1943)

. . . . $ 51.47 § 52.50 § 36.32 § 53.35 § 55.04 § 56.74 Net asset value: Per share present Class A Common.. . . .

COLUMBUS GAS FUEL CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, 292 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1934)

. . . added to a rate of 16.02 cents to be retained for distribution, would make the retail price in Columbus 55.04 . . .