Florida Statute 59.6 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 59
APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 59.06

59.06 Matters reviewable on appeal.—

(1) WHAT MAY BE ASSIGNED AS ERROR.—All judgments and orders made in any action wherein the trial court:

(a) May allow or refuse to allow any motion:

1. For a new trial or rehearing,

2. For leave to amend pleadings,

3. For leave to file new or additional pleadings,

4. To amend the record, or

5. For continuance of the action; or

(b) Shall sustain or overrule any motion to dismiss the action

may be assigned as error upon any appeal from the final judgment or order in the action. The appellate court shall hear and determine the matter so assigned under like rules as in other actions.

(2) EFFECT OF PLEADING OVER OR AMENDING.—Pleading over or amending pleadings after order upon motion to dismiss shall not waive the right to have the judgment or order reviewed.

History.—s. 1, ch. 521, 1853; s. 1, ch. 3430, 1883; RS 1265; GS 1693; RGS 2903; CGL 4608; s. 6, ch. 22854, 1945; s. 2, ch. 71-316.

F.S. 59.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 59.06 on CourtListener

Amendments to 59.06

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 59.06

Total Results: 8

State v. Spaziano

692 So. 2d 174, 1997 WL 182887

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1997 | Docket: 1524638

Cited 28 times | Published

appearing in substantially its original form as § 59.06(1), Fla. Stat.1957, F.S.A.), which recited that

Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver

121 So. 2d 648

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1960 | Docket: 1693164

Cited 27 times | Published

rules adopted by the Supreme Court. [16] See section 59.06, F.S.A. which prescribes those matters which

Platel v. MAGUIRE, VOORHIS & WELLS, PA

436 So. 2d 303, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1983 | Docket: 1701199

Cited 15 times | Published

Order. First, Mr. Platel alleges that, under section 59.06, Florida Statutes (1981), this court has no

Ruth v. Sorensen

104 So. 2d 10

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1958 | Docket: 311550

Cited 11 times | Published

appearing in substantially its original form as § 59.06(1), Fla. Stat. 1957, F.S.A.), which recited that

Osborne v. State

907 So. 2d 505, 2005 WL 1118031

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2005 | Docket: 459377

Cited 9 times | Published

cases as do all litigants in such proceedings. See § 59.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1999) (providing the statutory

State v. Dawson

290 So. 2d 79

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1974 | Docket: 1510344

Cited 8 times | Published

See Florida Statute 924.07(1) F.S.A., Florida Statute 59.06(5)(b) F.S.A., and F.A.R. 6.3, 32 F.S.A.

Stone's Throw Condo. Ass'n v. SAND COVE

749 So. 2d 520, 1999 WL 1203829

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1999 | Docket: 1291908

Cited 3 times | Published

cause of action against Mouriz survives under section 59.06, Florida Statutes (1995), which specifically

Koch v. State Road Department of Florida

106 So. 2d 426

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1958 | Docket: 60191143

Published

only upon an appeal from the final judgment. Section 59.06, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A. Proctor v. Kennedy