The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 59
APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 59.06

59.06 Matters reviewable on appeal.—

(1) WHAT MAY BE ASSIGNED AS ERROR.—All judgments and orders made in any action wherein the trial court:

(a) May allow or refuse to allow any motion:

1. For a new trial or rehearing,

2. For leave to amend pleadings,

3. For leave to file new or additional pleadings,

4. To amend the record, or

5. For continuance of the action; or

(b) Shall sustain or overrule any motion to dismiss the action

may be assigned as error upon any appeal from the final judgment or order in the action. The appellate court shall hear and determine the matter so assigned under like rules as in other actions.

(2) EFFECT OF PLEADING OVER OR AMENDING.—Pleading over or amending pleadings after order upon motion to dismiss shall not waive the right to have the judgment or order reviewed.

History.—s. 1, ch. 521, 1853; s. 1, ch. 3430, 1883; RS 1265; GS 1693; RGS 2903; CGL 4608; s. 6, ch. 22854, 1945; s. 2, ch. 71-316.

F.S. 59.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 59.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 59.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 59.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 59.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ELKAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 34 F. Supp. 3d 1369 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014)

. . . margins of 54.25% for Dongyuan, 63.87% for Su-perte/Zhaoshun, and a simple average of the two rates, 59.06% . . .

IN RE ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. v. FPL, 512 B.R. 447 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . The market price of these shares on that date (prior to disclosure of fraud) was $59.06. . . .

v., 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 156 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . garments made up of . . . textile fabrics (other than knitted or crocheted fabrics) of heading 59.03, 59.06 . . .

LEMANS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 675 F. Supp. 2d 1374 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . garments made up of ... textile fabrics (other than knitted or crocheted fabrics) of heading 59.03, 59.06 . . .

OSBORNE, v. STATE, 907 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 2005)

. . . See § 59.06(1), Fla. . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. BHUTANI ALRA, 266 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2001)

. . . Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 145, 96 S.Ct. 335, 46 L.Ed.2d 333 (1975); 3 Sutherland Statutory Construction § 59.06 . . .

T. PRYER, v. C. O. SLAVIC C. O. C. O. C. O. D., 251 F.3d 448 (3d Cir. 2001)

. . . Ford Motor Co., 569 F.2d 754, 760 (3d Cir.1977) (citing 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06, at 59-89 . . .

STONE S THROW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. a v. SAND COVE APARTMENTS, INC., 749 So. 2d 520 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . its original attempt to plead a section 553.84 cause of action against Mouriz survives under section 59.06 . . . See § 59.06(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . Unfortunately, no cases of recent vintage discuss whether section 59.06 applies to a plaintiff who fails . . . pleadings a claim that is dismissed without prejudice, and the older common law cases applying section 59.06 . . . Without discussing the propriety of a statutory regulation of judicial procedures, we find section 59.06 . . .

H. I. M. FATHOM, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 981 F. Supp. 610 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . state that heading 6113 “covers all garments made up of knitted or crocheted fabrics of heading 59.03, 59.06 . . .

H. I. M. v., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 776 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . state that heading 6113 “covers all garments made up of knitted or crocheted fabrics of heading 59.03, 59.06 . . .

STATE v. R. SPAZIANO,, 692 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1997)

. . . This it did by Ch. 521, Acts of 1853 (now appearing in substantially its original form as s 59.06(1), . . .

In RUNAWAY II, INC. a, 168 B.R. 193 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1994)

. . . See also James Moore, ed., 3 Colliers on Bankruptcy ¶ 59.06[1.2] and eases cited therein at n. 16-19 . . .

ALVENUS SHIPPING CO. LTD. v. DELTA PETROLEUM U. S. A. LTD. P. C. FLOTA PETROLEUM ECUATORIANA, v. DELTA PETROLEUM U. S. A. LTD. Co., 876 F. Supp. 482 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Asante apparently overlooked a $59.06 check that had been written against Delta’s account on January . . . 28, and so the month of January 1993 concluded with Delta $59.06 overdrawn. . . . The first transaction in February 1993 is a transfer of exactly $59.06 from Ionian to Delta to cover . . .

CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED BY JOSEPH JONES, VERNETTA G. JONES H N C, STENOGRAPH SYSTEMS, v. CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED BY ARTHUR PINEDA AND TONI PINEDA,, 798 F. Supp. 892 (D.P.R. 1992)

. . . Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil (1973), p. 93; see also Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd Ed., 1974, ¶ 59.06 . . . See 6A Moore's Federal Practice. ¶ 59.06 at 59-59 (2d ed. 1974). . . . .

F. KNIGHT, Jr. S. T. D. S. S. Jr. L. Dr. W. Y. N. S. Dr. Jr. v. STATE ALABAMA M. Jr. S. Jr. B. H. J. P. Dr. D. III, F. A. A. Sr. A. G. A M W. Dr. A M Jr. W. M. H. B. L. A. R. C. Dr. V. Dr. E. B. F. W. Jr. W. T. Jr. R. R. E. W. A. C. J. D. Jr. T. B. Jr. O. H. Jr. T. Jr. E. G. Jr. S. H. Jr. B. Dr. A. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF ALABAMA A M a a a a a a a a a a, 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . University Systea 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 96.00 95.01 4.00 4.99 00*001 00*001 59.06 . . .

In D. DRIMMEL K. In UNRUH,, 135 B.R. 410 (D. Kan. 1991)

. . . Norton, BANKRUPTCY LAW AND PRACTICE § 59.06 (1990). . . .

LIMBACH COMPANY v. SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL- CIO No., 949 F.2d 1241 (3d Cir. 1991)

. . . See also 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06 (2d ed.1989). . . .

L. MASON, W. v. TEXACO, INC., 948 F.2d 1546 (10th Cir. 1991)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice, II 59.06, at 59-56 to 59-58 (1984). . . .

LIMBACH COMPANY, v. SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, No. No. No. J. LIMBACH COMPANY v. SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL- CIO No., 949 F.2d 1211 (3d Cir. 1991)

. . . See also 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06 (2d ed.1989). . . .

BROAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTORS, INC., 923 F.2d 1232 (6th Cir. 1991)

. . . Co., 283 U.S. 494, 498-99, 51 S.Ct. 513, 514-15, 75 L.Ed. 1188 (1931); 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06 . . .

KUEHNE NAGEL AG CO v. GEOSOURCE, INC. GEOSOURCE, INC. v. PANALPINA WELTTRANSPORT G. m. b. H., 874 F.2d 283 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . Grotheer, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06. . . .

V. CHILDERS, v. W. JOSEPH, t d b a a A. B. a L. v. POWER LINE EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC. L. t a E S P. Co., 842 F.2d 689 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . Heckman, 587 F.2d at 619 (citing 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 59.06 (2d ed. 1974)). . . .

DOWNS, v. GULF WESTERN MANUFACTURING CO. INC., 677 F. Supp. 661 (D. Mass. 1987)

. . . Though an efficient and proper course at times, see generally 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra, ¶ 59.06 . . .

D. D. L. Co. A. H. v., 86 T.C. 66 (T.C. 1986)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 59.06 (1984 rev.). . . .

K- B TRUCKING COMPANY v. RISS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, 763 F.2d 1148 (10th Cir. 1985)

. . . Lucas, Moore's Federal Practice ft 59.06, at 59-56 to 59-58 (1984). . . .

CHANNEL INC. v. WORLD WIDE TOWERS SERVICES, INC., 607 F. Supp. 551 (S.D. Tex. 1985)

. . . where it would be manifestly prejudicial not to retry the entire case. 6A Moore, Federal Practice, § 59.06 . . .

M. SODERBECK, v. BURNETT COUNTY, WISCONSIN A. M. SODERBECK, v. BURNETT COUNTY, WISCONSIN,, 752 F.2d 285 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . Sea-Land Service, Inc., 688 F.2d 898, 906 (2d Cir.1982); 6A Moore’s Federal Practice If 59.06, at p. . . .

KOROTKI v. J. GOUGHAN,, 597 F. Supp. 1365 (D. Md. 1984)

. . . BP Oil Corporation, supra at 578; 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Ed., 1974 ¶ 59.06. . . .

A. TOMCHEK- MAY, v. BROWN COUNTY,, 581 F. Supp. 1163 (E.D. Wis. 1984)

. . . . § 59.06 to coordinate the personnel functions of the county. . . .

MEKDECI, By MEKDECI, v. MERRELL NATIONAL LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF RICHARDSON- MERRELL, INC. a, 711 F.2d 1510 (11th Cir. 1983)

. . . Moore, 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06 (2d ed. 1979). . . .

C. PLATEL, v. MAGUIRE, VOORHIS WELLS, P. A., 436 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Platel alleges that, under section 59.06, Florida Statutes (1981), this court has no jurisdiction to . . .

MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CORPORATION, a v. GREENLEE TOOL COMPANY, a, 693 F.2d 1037 (11th Cir. 1982)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 59.06 (2d ed. 1982); Annot., 85 A.L.R.2d 9 (1962). . . .

In D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC. HADAR LEASING INTERNATIONAL CO. INC. v. D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC., 23 B.R. 823 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . cor- thence in a northerly direction, still along the aforementioned dividing line, N. 18° 52' 35" E. 59.06 . . .

HEGGER, P. v. E. GREEN, St. s, 646 F.2d 22 (2d Cir. 1981)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice Par. 59.06 at 59-88 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

E. LUCAS, v. AMERICAN MANUFACTURING CO. a Co., 630 F.2d 291 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . Moore, 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06 (2d ed. 1979). . . .

D. POUNCY, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 499 F. Supp. 427 (S.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . of defendant’s expert’s studies: Year Blacks Promoted Expected Blacks Promoted Difference t 1973 66 59.06 . . .

In KREIDLER IMPORT CORPORATION,, 4 B.R. 256 (Bankr. D. Md. 1980)

. . . if he surrendered his preference at some time prior to adjudication. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 59.06 . . .

W. HECKMAN v. THE FEDERAL PRESS COMPANY, ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY c o v. CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, BROWN TRAILER DIVISION, 587 F.2d 612 (3d Cir. 1978)

. . . appeals has broad discretion to grant a new trial as to all or some issues. 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 59.06 . . .

AJAX HARDWARE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, v. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS CORPORATION,, 569 F.2d 181 (2d Cir. 1977)

. . . See 6A Moore’s Federal Practice H 59.06, at 59-80 to 59-83 (2d ed. 1974); Scheurholz v. . . .

EVANS, a v. S. S. KRESGE COMPANY, a, 544 F.2d 1184 (3d Cir. 1976)

. . . See also 8 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 59.06[3] (1972), 1 Callman, Unfair Competition . . .

W. GATES, v. L. G. DeWITT, INC. WEBER, v. L. G. DeWITT, INC. W. C. WEBER, v. L. G. DeWITT, INC. W., 532 F.2d 1052 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . Slade, 431 F.2d 605 (CA 5, 1970); 6A Moore’s Federal Practice 59.06 (2d ed. 1948). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. MEYERS, 529 F.2d 1033 (7th Cir. 1976)

. . . See 2A Sutherland, Statutes and Statutor Construction (4th ed. 1973), §§ 45.12, 47.01, 47.26, 59.06. . . .

GREAT COASTAL EXPRESS, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN HELPERS OF AMERICA,, 511 F.2d 839 (4th Cir. 1975)

. . . Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil (1973), p. 93; see also Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd Ed., 1974, U 59.06 . . .

STATE v. B. DAWSON, III,, 290 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . See Florida Statute 924.07(1) F.S.A., Florida Statute 59.06(5) (b) F.S.A., and F.A.R. 6.3, 32 F.S.A. . . .

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES NORTHERN PROPANE GAS COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 470 F.2d 1107 (8th Cir. 1973)

. . . reproduction cost of assets is evidence of their value. 10 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 59.06 . . . actual reduction in market value resulting from wear, age and obsolescence. 10 Mertens, supra, at § 59.06 . . .

YODICE, v. KONINKLIJKE NEDERLANDSCHE STOOMBOOT MAATSCHAPPIJ, v. UNIVERSAL TERMINAL STEVEDORING CORP., 443 F.2d 76 (2d Cir. 1971)

. . . Refining Co., 283 U.S. 494, 499-500, 51 S.Ct. 513, 75 L.Ed. 1188 (1931); 6A Moore, Federal Practice j[ 59.06 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. R. SLADE, S., 431 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice § 59.06 at 3767 (footnotes omitted). . . .

GATLIN, v. JACOBS CONSTRUCTION CO. a GATLIN, v. JACOBS CONSTRUCTION CO. a, 218 So. 2d 188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . Sections 59.06(1) and 59.07(4), F.S.1967, F.S.A. Leonetti v. Boone, Fla. 1954, 74 So.2d 5S1. . . .

KIFF, Jr. v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY,, 402 F.2d 129 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice, ¶ 59.06, at 3761 (2d ed. 1966). . . .

ESPAILLAT, v. BERLITZ SCHOOLS OF LANGUAGES OF AMERICA, INC., 383 F.2d 220 (D.D.C. 1967)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 59.06, at 3761 n. 9 (2d ed. Supp.1966). . . .

H. CASKEY, v. VILLAGE OF WAYLAND E., 375 F.2d 1004 (2d Cir. 1967)

. . . Dehner, supra; Moore’s Federal Practice § 59.06 at p. 3762; cf. Dimick v. . . .

LOWERY, d b a Co. v. CLOUSE, a a, 348 F.2d 252 (8th Cir. 1965)

. . . 415 (1951), cert. denied 342 U.S. 941, 72 S.Ct. 553, 96 L.Ed. 700; 6 Moore, Federal Practice, Par. 59.06 . . .

GENERAL HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, INC. a v. GAGER, a B. B. S. S. GERSPACHER, v. GAGER, a B. B. a, 160 So. 2d 749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . Sections 59.06(1), 59.07(4) Fla.Stat, F.S. A., Leonetti v. Boone, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 551. . . .

McSPARRAN, v. HANIGAN, R. F. Co. JOHN McSHAIN, INC. v. WILLIAM H. WALTERS SONS, INC. McSPARRAN, v. SUBERS, 225 F. Supp. 628 (E.D. Pa. 1963)

. . . See 6 Moore, Federal Practice (2d ed. 1953), ¶ 59.06. . . . .

H. L. YOUNG N. v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, DICKERSON, INCORPORATED, PHOENIX INDEMNITY COMPANY, PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK L. H. SIMKINS,, 322 F.2d 820 (4th Cir. 1963)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 59.06, p. 3762 ; 3 Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure . . .

A. EICHEL, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY,, 319 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1963)

. . . See 6 Moore, Federal Practice (2d ed. 1953), ¶] 59.06, at 3762. . . .

W. SHERWIN v. B. WELCH,, 319 F.2d 729 (D.C. Cir. 1963)

. . . United States, 108 F.2d 784 (4th Cir. 1940); and see 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 59.06-07, 59.16 (1953 . . .

TEXAS CONTINENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. D. DUNNE J. E. II, TEXAS CONTINENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. BANKERS BOND COMPANY,, 307 F.2d 242 (6th Cir. 1962)

. . . Rule 59(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, Second Edition Par. 59.06, . . .

SMITH, v. HOBART MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. HOLIDAY FROSTED FOOD COMPANY, SMITH, v. HOBART MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. HOLIDAY FROSTED FOOD COMPANY,, 302 F.2d 570 (3d Cir. 1962)

. . . Para. 59.06, pp. 3766-67. . . . .

A. L. RUSSO, v. CLARK,, 147 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1962)

. . . Sec. 59.04, 59.06, F.S.A., would otherwise be ineffective, resulting in a wholly improper repeal or deprivation . . .

MASON, v. MATHIASEN TANKER INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED,, 298 F.2d 28 (4th Cir. 1962)

. . . Dann, 11 F.R.D. 386 (D.Del. 1951); 6 Moore, Federal Practice, para. 59.06, p. 3759 ff. (1953); cf. . . .

TSAI, v. C. ROSENTHAL C. ROSENTHAL, v. TSAI, 297 F.2d 614 (8th Cir. 1961)

. . . See 6 Moore, Federal Practice, f 59.06. . . .

RAMAGLI REALTY CO. a v. CRAVER,, 121 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1960)

. . . See section 59.06, F.S.A. which prescribes those matters which are reviewable on appeal from final judgments . . .

KOCH v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, 106 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1958)

. . . Section 59.06, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A. Proctor v. Kennedy, Fla., 64 So.2d 567. . . .

R. RUTH E. v. SORENSEN,, 104 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1958)

. . . This it did by Ch. 521, Acts of 1853 (now appearing in substantially its original form as § 59.06(1), . . .

BRADDOCK, v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, M. BRADDOCK, v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANY,, 80 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 1955)

. . . appeal by the plaintiff below, taken from the order of October 15, under provisions of Secs. 59.04, 59.06 . . .

LEONETTI v. BOONE, 74 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1954)

. . . Sections 59.06(1) and 59.07(4), Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A. . . .