Florida Statute 59.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 59
APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 59.06

59.06 Matters reviewable on appeal.—

(1) WHAT MAY BE ASSIGNED AS ERROR.—All judgments and orders made in any action wherein the trial court:

(a) May allow or refuse to allow any motion:

1. For a new trial or rehearing,

2. For leave to amend pleadings,

3. For leave to file new or additional pleadings,

4. To amend the record, or

5. For continuance of the action; or

(b) Shall sustain or overrule any motion to dismiss the action

may be assigned as error upon any appeal from the final judgment or order in the action. The appellate court shall hear and determine the matter so assigned under like rules as in other actions.

(2) EFFECT OF PLEADING OVER OR AMENDING.—Pleading over or amending pleadings after order upon motion to dismiss shall not waive the right to have the judgment or order reviewed.

History.—s. 1, ch. 521, 1853; s. 1, ch. 3430, 1883; RS 1265; GS 1693; RGS 2903; CGL 4608; s. 6, ch. 22854, 1945; s. 2, ch. 71-316.

F.S. 59.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 59.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 59.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 59.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 59.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 59.06

Total Results: 20

Jennifer Ripple, etc. v. CBS Corporation

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-05-09

Snippet: claim of the decedent’s adult children. Id. at 59. 6 Our review follows.

Floridians Against Increased Rates, Inc. v. Gary F. Clark, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-28

Snippet: -3- equity-to-debt ratio of 59.6%, 5 and a return on equity (ROE) 6 between 9.7%

In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-09

Citation: 83 So. 3d 597, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122

Snippet: McCain (R) in the 2008 presidential election, and 59.6% for Crist (R) in the 2006 gubernatorial election

Osborne v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-05-12

Citation: 907 So. 2d 505, 2005 WL 1118031

Snippet: as do all litigants in such proceedings. See § 59.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1999) (providing the statutory right

Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-03-31

Citation: 899 So. 2d 1090, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 593, 2005 WL 729173

Snippet: petitioner's right of access to the courts. Id. at 59. [6] We are not presented here with the rejection

Friends of Nassau County, Inc. v. Nassau County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-02

Citation: 752 So. 2d 42, 2000 WL 121787

Snippet: judge recommended awarding fees under section 120.59(6), Florida Statutes (1995), as well as under section

Stone's Throw Condo. Ass'n v. SAND COVE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-12-17

Citation: 749 So. 2d 520

Snippet: of action against Mouriz survives under section 59.06, Florida Statutes (1995), which specifically allows

State v. Spaziano

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-04-17

Citation: 692 So. 2d 174, 1997 WL 182887

Snippet: appearing in substantially its original form as § 59.06(1), Fla. Stat.1957, F.S.A.), which recited that

Thomas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-06-30

Citation: 657 So. 2d 51, 1995 WL 385664

Snippet: paragraph, imposes juvenile sanctions under s. 39.059(6).

T.L.P. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-06-28

Citation: 657 So. 2d 49, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6998, 1995 WL 380843

Snippet: paragraph, imposes juvenile sanctions under s. 39.059(6). A subsequent violation occurs only after the juvenile

Crain v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-03-31

Citation: 653 So. 2d 442, 1995 WL 136728

Snippet: put Crain on notice in accordance with section 39.059(6)(b) that if she did not prove suitable for treatment

Hangen v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-02-03

Citation: 651 So. 2d 706, 1995 WL 39848

Snippet: paragraph, imposes juvenile sanctions under s. 39.059(6).[1] According to the Duval County Circuit Court

Powell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-10-16

Citation: 606 So. 2d 486, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688, 1992 WL 282066

Snippet: language similar to the contained in section 39.059(6)(b): “(5)(a) If a minor proves not to be amenable

Burke v. Harbor Estates Associates, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-12-26

Citation: 591 So. 2d 1034, 1991 WL 279405

Snippet: receive an award of attorney fees under Section 120.59(6), Florida Statutes. Appellant argues that DER erred

Brookridge Community Property Owners, Inc. v. Brookridge, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-01-24

Citation: 573 So. 2d 972, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 427, 1991 WL 6006

Snippet: 80% TOTAL 56% 59% 6. On the date that the subject age restrictions

Solis v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVS.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-06-06

Citation: 546 So. 2d 1073, 1989 WL 59547

Snippet: "under color of law," Alfred, 487 So.2d at 357, 358-59[6]; see also Alfred, 487 So.2d at *1075 359 (Schwartz

Spiro v. Highlands General Hospital

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-05-23

Citation: 489 So. 2d 802, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1195, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7963

Snippet: attorney general supplemented this opinion in Op. 059-6 dated January 15, 1959, by specifying that: It is

Platel v. MAGUIRE, VOORHIS & WELLS, PA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-08-04

Citation: 436 So. 2d 303, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22565

Snippet: First, Mr. Platel alleges that, under section 59.06, Florida Statutes (1981), this court has no jurisdiction

FINANCIAL INTERN. LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW MEXICO v. Beta Trust Corp., Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-11-04

Citation: 405 So. 2d 306

Snippet: Section 631.001 et seq., Florida Statutes, and Article 59-6-7 et seq., New Mexico Statutes, provides that the

Cardozo v. True

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-02-23

Citation: 342 So. 2d 1053, 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 69

Snippet: Ill. Publishing & Printing Co., 289 Ill. App. 59, 6 N.E.2d 526 (1937), where the court refused to hold