|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
F.S. 59.1559.15 Proceedings in pais; authentication.—Proceedings in pais, not stenographically reported, may be authenticated by recitals in orders, judgments, or decrees, of the trial court, or of the judge thereof, or by a stipulation by the interested parties.History.—s. 68, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, ch. 138, 1848; RS 1268; GS 1696; s. 10, ch. 7838, 1919; RGS 2906; CGL 4616; s. 15, ch. 22854, 1945; s. 5, ch. 71-316.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 59.15
Total Results: 7
158 So. 2d 808
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1963 | Docket: 1272114
Cited 6 times | Published
recital in an order of of the court. [F.S. Section 59.15(4), F.S.A.] Cf. Cleary Bros. Const. Co. v. Phelps
114 So. 2d 638
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1959 | Docket: 1277865
Cited 6 times | Published
shall constitute the record-on-appeal."
[2] Section 59.15(4), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. "Proceedings in pais;
262 So. 2d 210, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6705
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1972 | Docket: 429084
Cited 4 times | Published
the rules and statutes provide no solution. F.S. § 59.15(4) F.S.A. says that
"Proceedings in pais, not
380 So. 2d 497
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1980 | Docket: 1725574
Cited 2 times | Published
before us which can be considered pursuant to Section 59.15, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides:
Proceedings
272 So. 2d 831
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1973 | Docket: 64530222
Published
(See Rule 3.6(h), F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and F.S. Section 59.15, F.S.A.).
REED, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER,
267 So. 2d 360, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6137
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1972 | Docket: 64527946
Published
judgment.’ ”
See also 6A Moore, Federal Practice § 59.-15.
An appellant in a criminal proceeding is no less
256 So. 2d 78, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5571
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1971 | Docket: 64523686
Published
was the record reconstructed as provided for by § 59.15(4) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
The city moved to dismiss