59.15
Proceedings in pais; authentication.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
59.15 Proceedings in pais; authentication.—Proceedings in pais, not stenographically reported, may be authenticated by recitals in orders, judgments, or decrees, of the trial court, or of the judge thereof, or by a stipulation by the interested parties.
History.—s. 68, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, ch. 138, 1848; RS 1268; GS 1696; s. 10, ch. 7838, 1919; RGS 2906; CGL 4616; s. 15, ch. 22854, 1945; s. 5, ch. 71-316.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1959–1980 · leading case: Travelers Ins. Co. v. Agricultural Delivery Service
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Agricultural Delivery Service (1972)
“So both the statute and the rule (F.S. § 59.15 F.S.A. and F.A.R. 3.6( l )) fall short of supplying a definitive answer to the problem.”
Mahoney v. Mahoney (1980)
“Although there is no transcript, there are certain authenticated facts before us which can be considered pursuant to Section 59.15, Florida Statutes (1979), which provides: Proceedings in pais; authentication Proceedings in pais, not stenographically reported, may be…”
Moyer v. Moyer (1959)
“" [2] Section 59.15(4), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. "Proceedings in pais; authentication.”
Turnipseed v. Turnipseed (1963)
“Therefore, they will often find occasions when agreement may be reached upon a narrative statement of the testimony although no stenographic record is available.”
City of Miami v. Brown (1971)
“, nor was the record reconstructed as provided for by § 59.15(4) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The city moved to dismiss the appeal.”
Glover v. Cherney (1973)
“Section 59.15, F.S.A.). REED, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ.”
— 59.15(4) — 4 cases
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Agricultural Delivery Service (1972)
“So both the statute and the rule (F.S. § 59.15 F.S.A. and F.A.R. 3.6( l )) fall short of supplying a definitive answer to the problem.”
Moyer v. Moyer (1959)
“" [2] Section 59.15(4), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. "Proceedings in pais; authentication.”
Turnipseed v. Turnipseed (1963)
“Therefore, they will often find occasions when agreement may be reached upon a narrative statement of the testimony although no stenographic record is available.”
City of Miami v. Brown (1971)
“, nor was the record reconstructed as provided for by § 59.15(4) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The city moved to dismiss the appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.