Florida Statute 60.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 60
INJUNCTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 60.07

60.07 Assessment of damages after dissolution.—In injunction actions, on dissolution, the court may hear evidence and assess damages to which a defendant may be entitled under any injunction bond, eliminating the necessity for an action on the injunction bond if no party has requested a jury trial on damages.

History.—ss. 1, 3, ch. 26916, 1951; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 15, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 64.16.

F.S. 60.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 60.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 60.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 60.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 60.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 60.07

Total Results: 20

The Florida Bar v. Curtis S. Alva

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-17

Snippet: proceedings, totaling $22,866.60. -7- Additionally, the referee recommended

LOUMPOS v. RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC., BANK ONE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-02

Snippet: See Beal Bank, 780 So. 2d at 60. 7 signature card designates an

Citizens of the State of Florida, etc. v. Gary F. Clark, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-09

Snippet: administrative context, see Fla. Admin. Code R. 25-22.060. 7. Our preservation requirement does not extend

DAWN RENE HOLDING, LLC and DAVID MATHIESEN v. WORLD JET OF DELAWARE, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-08-25

Snippet: wrongfully issued injunction is controlled by section 60.07, Florida Statutes ....” Calder Race Course, Inc

Q.H. c/o AMY HILL v. SUNSHINE STATE HEALTH PLAN, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-10-07

Snippet: explained that the child’s predicted height was between 60.7 to 61.8 inches, which was “about five to six inches

Q.H. c/o AMY HILL v. SUNSHINE STATE HEALTH PLAN, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-10-07

Snippet: explained that the child’s predicted height was between 60.7 to 61.8 inches, which was “about five to six inches

Q.H. c/o AMY HILL v. SUNSHINE STATE HEALTH PLAN, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-10-07

Snippet: explained that the child’s predicted height was between 60.7 to 61.8 inches, which was “about five to six inches

PREMIER COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC. v. ERIC LARSON

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-13

Citation: 250 So. 3d 94

Snippet: bond for its temporary injunction, and section 60.07, Florida Statutes, provided that “[i]n injunction

Luis Torres Jimenez v. State of Florida, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-03

Citation: 246 So. 3d 219

Snippet: Florida Statutes. Id. at 159-60. -7- Following an evidentiary

Villasol Community v. TC 12

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-01

Snippet: dissolved, Appellee sought damages pursuant to section 60.07, Florida Statutes (2015). In response, Appellant

Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Professional Supplements, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-15

Citation: 210 So. 3d 766, 2017 WL 626661, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2058

Snippet: damages resulting from the injunction under section 60.07, Florida Statutes (2012). Based on evidence presented

Nalasco v. Buckman, Buckman & Reid, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-15

Citation: 171 So. 3d 759, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10776, 2015 WL 4269635

Snippet: proceedings. His paralegal had spent an additional 60.7 hours on the case. The Nalascos’ counsel took the

Peter Nalasco, Individually and on behalf of the Peter Nalasco IRA, Johanne Lavoie Nalasco, Individually and on behalf of the Johanne Lavoie Nalasco Ira and Loui John Nalasco v. Buckman, Buckman & Reid, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-15

Snippet: proceedings. His paralegal had spent an additional 60.7 hours on the case. The Nalascos’ counsel took the

Andrew J. Andrist and Douglas S. Stanhope v. Stephen P. Spleen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-16

Citation: 142 So. 3d 950, 2014 WL 3434531, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10869

Snippet: 1 The court strictly construed section 60.07, Florida Statutes (2012), and awarded only the amount

Highway 46 Holdings, LLC v. Myers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-11-09

Citation: 114 So. 3d 215, 2012 WL 5456404, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19548

Snippet: injunction bond.” Id. (citation omitted); see also § 60.07, Fla. Stat. (2011). In Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v

In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-09

Citation: 83 So. 3d 597, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122

Snippet: district, having a black voting-age population of 60.7%.54 District 34’s shape is similar to the shape

Bradenton Group, Inc. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-11-09

Citation: 970 So. 2d 403

Snippet: for award of attorney's fees pursuant to section 60.07, Florida Statutes (1995). The case was thereafter

S AND T BUILDERS v. Globe Properties, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-11-16

Citation: 944 So. 2d 302, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 792, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2685

Snippet: after the dissolution of an injunction, section 60.07 of the Florida Statutes (2005) provides: In injunction

Broward Yachts, Inc. v. Yachting Promotions, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-12-08

Citation: 889 So. 2d 911, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18783, 2004 WL 2823454

Snippet: attorney’s fees in Parker Tampa Two was section 60.07, Florida Statutes (1987), and rule 1.610(b), which

Daiwa Products, Inc. v. NATIONSBANK, NA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-09-01

Citation: 885 So. 2d 884, 2004 WL 1933124

Snippet: entitled to damages caused by the injunction. E.g., § 60.07, Fla. Stat. (1999) (providing that on dissolution