Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 61.075 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 61.075 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 61.075

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 61.075
61.075 Equitable distribution of marital assets and liabilities.
(1) In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, in addition to all other remedies available to a court to do equity between the parties, or in a proceeding for disposition of assets following a dissolution of marriage by a court which lacked jurisdiction over the absent spouse or lacked jurisdiction to dispose of the assets, the court shall set apart to each spouse that spouse’s nonmarital assets and liabilities, and in distributing the marital assets and liabilities between the parties, the court must begin with the premise that the distribution should be equal, unless there is a justification for an unequal distribution based on all relevant factors, including:
(a) The contribution to the marriage by each spouse, including contributions to the care and education of the children and services as homemaker.
(b) The economic circumstances of the parties.
(c) The duration of the marriage.
(d) Any interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities of either party.
(e) The contribution of one spouse to the personal career or educational opportunity of the other spouse.
(f) The desirability of retaining any asset, including an interest in a business, corporation, or professional practice, intact and free from any claim or interference by the other party.
(g) The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, enhancement, and production of income or the improvement of, or the incurring of liabilities to, both the marital assets and the nonmarital assets of the parties.
(h) The desirability of retaining the marital home as a residence for any dependent child of the marriage, or any other party, when it would be equitable to do so, it is in the best interest of the child or that party, and it is financially feasible for the parties to maintain the residence until the child is emancipated or until exclusive possession is otherwise terminated by a court of competent jurisdiction. In making this determination, the court shall first determine if it would be in the best interest of the dependent child to remain in the marital home; and, if not, whether other equities would be served by giving any other party exclusive use and possession of the marital home.
(i) The intentional dissipation, waste, depletion, or destruction of marital assets after the filing of the petition or within 2 years prior to the filing of the petition.
(j) Any other factors necessary to do equity and justice between the parties.
(2) If the court awards a cash payment for the purpose of equitable distribution of marital assets, to be paid in full or in installments, the full amount ordered shall vest when the judgment is awarded and the award shall not terminate upon remarriage or death of either party, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, but shall be treated as a debt owed from the obligor or the obligor’s estate to the obligee or the obligee’s estate, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties.
(3) In any contested dissolution action wherein a stipulation and agreement has not been entered and filed, any distribution of marital assets or marital liabilities shall be supported by factual findings in the judgment or order based on competent substantial evidence with reference to the factors enumerated in subsection (1). The distribution of all marital assets and marital liabilities, whether equal or unequal, shall include specific written findings of fact as to the following:
(a) Clear identification of nonmarital assets and ownership interests;
(b) Identification of marital assets, including the individual valuation of significant assets, and designation of which spouse shall be entitled to each asset;
(c) Identification of the marital liabilities and designation of which spouse shall be responsible for each liability;
(d) Any other findings necessary to advise the parties or the reviewing court of the trial court’s rationale for the distribution of marital assets and allocation of liabilities.
(4) The judgment distributing assets shall have the effect of a duly executed instrument of conveyance, transfer, release, or acquisition which is recorded in the county where the property is located when the judgment, or a certified copy of the judgment, is recorded in the official records of the county in which the property is located.
(5) If the court finds good cause that there should be an interim partial distribution during the pendency of a dissolution action, the court may enter an interim order that shall identify and value the marital and nonmarital assets and liabilities made the subject of the sworn motion, set apart those nonmarital assets and liabilities, and provide for a partial distribution of those marital assets and liabilities. An interim order may be entered at any time after the date the dissolution of marriage is filed and served and before the final distribution of marital and nonmarital assets and marital and nonmarital liabilities.
(a) Such an interim order shall be entered only upon good cause shown and upon sworn motion establishing specific factual basis for the motion. The motion may be filed by either party and shall demonstrate good cause why the matter should not be deferred until the final hearing.
(b) The court shall specifically take into account and give appropriate credit for any partial distribution of marital assets or liabilities in its final allocation of marital assets or liabilities. Further, the court shall make specific findings in any interim order under this section that any partial distribution will not cause inequity or prejudice to either party as to either party’s claims for support or attorney’s fees.
(c) Any interim order partially distributing marital assets or liabilities as provided in this subsection shall be pursuant to and comport with the factors in subsections (1) and (3) as such factors pertain to the assets or liabilities made the subject of the sworn motion.
(d) As used in this subsection, the term “good cause” means extraordinary circumstances that justify an interim partial distribution. In determining if extraordinary circumstances exist for purposes of this subsection, the court must consider the following:
1. Whether there is a need for funds in order to avoid or prevent the loss of an asset through repossession or foreclosure, the loss of housing, the default by either party of a marital debt, or the levy of a tax lien.
2. Whether there is a need for funds to pay an expense for a dependent child if nonpayment of the expense would be detrimental to the child.
3. Whether one or both parties have a need to access funds in order to pay a reasonable amount of the attorney fees, court costs, or other suit money for maintaining or defending a proceeding under this chapter.
4. Any other circumstances that justify the entry of an order granting an interim partial equitable distribution.
(6) As used in this section:
(a)1. “Marital assets and liabilities” include all of the following:
a. Assets acquired and liabilities incurred during the marriage, individually by either spouse or jointly by them.
b. The enhancement in value and appreciation of nonmarital assets resulting from the efforts of either party during the marriage or from the contribution to or expenditure thereon of marital funds or other forms of marital assets, or both.
c. The paydown of principal of a note and mortgage secured by nonmarital real property and a portion of any passive appreciation in the property, if the note and mortgage secured by the property are paid down from marital funds during the marriage. The portion of passive appreciation in the property characterized as marital and subject to equitable distribution is determined by multiplying a coverture fraction by the passive appreciation in the property during the marriage.
(I) The passive appreciation is determined by subtracting the value of the property on the date of the marriage or the date of acquisition of the property, whichever is later, from the value of the property on the valuation date in the dissolution action, less any active appreciation of the property during the marriage as described in sub-subparagraph b., and less any additional encumbrances secured by the property during the marriage in excess of the first note and mortgage on which principal is paid from marital funds.
(II) The coverture fraction must consist of a numerator, defined as the total payment of principal from marital funds of all notes and mortgages secured by the property during the marriage, and a denominator, defined as the value of the subject real property on the date of the marriage, the date of acquisition of the property, or the date the property was encumbered by the first note and mortgage on which principal was paid from marital funds, whichever is later.
(III) The passive appreciation must be multiplied by the coverture fraction to determine the marital portion of the passive appreciation of the property.
(IV) The total marital portion of the property consists of the marital portion of the passive appreciation, the mortgage principal paid during the marriage from marital funds, and any active appreciation of the property during the marriage as described in sub-subparagraph b., not to exceed the total net equity in the property at the date of valuation.
(V) The court shall apply the formula specified in this subparagraph unless a party shows circumstances sufficient to establish that application of the formula would be inequitable under the facts presented.
d. Interspousal gifts during the marriage. An interspousal gift of real property may not be made in the absence of a writing that complies with the requirements of s. 689.01. The joinder of a spouse in the execution of a deed with the sole purpose of the conveyance of homestead real property to any person or entity other than the other spouse or both spouses jointly does not change the character of the real property being conveyed, or any proceeds from the sale thereof, to marital property.
e. All vested and nonvested benefits, rights, and funds accrued during the marriage in retirement, pension, profit-sharing, annuity, deferred compensation, and insurance plans and programs.
f. The marital interests in a closely held business. The court shall determine the value of the marital interests in a closely held business as follows:
(I) The standard of value of a closely held business is fair market value. For purposes of this sub-subparagraph, the term “fair market value” means the price at which property would change hands between a willing and able buyer and a willing and able seller, with neither party under compulsion to buy or sell, and when both parties have reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts.
(II) If there is goodwill separate and distinct from the continued presence and reputation of the owner spouse, it is considered enterprise goodwill, which is a marital asset that must be valued by the court.
(III) The court must consider evidence that a covenant not to compete or a similar restrictive covenant may be required upon the sale of the closely held business, but such evidence alone does not preclude the court from finding enterprise goodwill.
2. All real property held by the parties as tenants by the entireties, whether acquired before or during the marriage, is presumed to be a marital asset. If, in any case, a party makes a claim to the contrary, the burden of proof is on the party asserting the claim that the subject property, or some portion thereof, is nonmarital.
3. All personal property titled jointly by the parties as tenants by the entireties, whether acquired before or during the marriage, is presumed to be a marital asset. In the event a party makes a claim to the contrary, the burden of proof is on the party asserting the claim that the subject property, or some portion thereof, is nonmarital.
4. The burden of proof to overcome the gift presumption is by clear and convincing evidence.
(b) “Nonmarital assets and liabilities” include all of the following:
1. Assets acquired and liabilities incurred by either party prior to the marriage, and assets acquired and liabilities incurred in exchange for such assets and liabilities.
2. Assets acquired separately by either party by noninterspousal gift, bequest, devise, or descent, and assets acquired in exchange for such assets.
3. All income derived from nonmarital assets during the marriage unless the income was treated, used, or relied upon by the parties as a marital asset.
4. Assets and liabilities excluded from marital assets and liabilities by valid written agreement of the parties, and assets acquired and liabilities incurred in exchange for such assets and liabilities.
5. Any liability incurred by forgery or unauthorized signature of one spouse signing the name of the other spouse. Any such liability is a nonmarital liability only of the party having committed the forgery or having affixed the unauthorized signature. In determining an award of attorney fees and costs pursuant to s. 61.16, the court may consider forgery or an unauthorized signature by a party and may make a separate award for attorney fees and costs occasioned by the forgery or unauthorized signature. This subparagraph does not apply to any forged or unauthorized signature that was subsequently ratified by the other spouse.
6. Real property acquired separately by either party by noninterspousal gift, bequest, devise, or descent for which legal title has not been transferred to the parties as tenants by the entireties in accordance with this section.
(7) The cut-off date for determining assets and liabilities to be identified or classified as marital assets and liabilities is the earliest of the date the parties enter into a valid separation agreement, such other date as may be expressly established by such agreement, or the date of the filing of a petition for dissolution of marriage. The date for determining value of assets and the amount of liabilities identified or classified as marital is the date or dates as the judge determines is just and equitable under the circumstances. Different assets may be valued as of different dates, as, in the judge’s discretion, the circumstances require.
(8) All assets acquired and liabilities incurred by either spouse subsequent to the date of the marriage and not specifically established as nonmarital assets or liabilities are presumed to be marital assets and liabilities. Such presumption is overcome by a showing that the assets and liabilities are nonmarital assets and liabilities. The presumption is only for evidentiary purposes in the dissolution proceeding and does not vest title. Title to disputed assets shall vest only by the judgment of a court. This section does not require the joinder of spouses in the conveyance, transfer, or hypothecation of a spouse’s individual property; affect the laws of descent and distribution; or establish community property in this state.
(9) The court may provide for equitable distribution of the marital assets and liabilities without regard to alimony for either party. After the determination of an equitable distribution of the marital assets and liabilities, the court shall consider whether a judgment for alimony shall be made.
(10)(a) To do equity between the parties, the court may, in lieu of or to supplement, facilitate, or effectuate the equitable division of marital assets and liabilities, order a monetary payment in a lump sum or in installments paid over a fixed period of time.
(b) If installment payments are ordered, the court may require security and a reasonable rate of interest or may otherwise recognize the time value of the money to be paid in the judgment or order.
(c) This subsection does not preclude the application of chapter 55 to any subsequent default.
(11) Special equity is abolished. All claims formerly identified as special equity, and all special equity calculations, are abolished and shall be asserted either as a claim for unequal distribution of marital property and resolved by the factors set forth in subsection (1) or as a claim of enhancement in value or appreciation of nonmarital property.
History.s. 1, ch. 88-98; s. 2, ch. 91-246; s. 3, ch. 93-188; s. 1, ch. 94-204; s. 1, ch. 96-305; s. 1, ch. 2002-244; s. 1, ch. 2008-46; s. 1, ch. 2018-56; s. 1, ch. 2024-237.

F.S. 61.075 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.075 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.075


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.075
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.075.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 61.075

Total Results: 20

Helvy Rojas v. Ada Isis Pelaez Otero

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-11-13T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: issues. B. Facial Deficiencies Section 61.075, Florida Statutes (2024), governs the distribution…distribution of marital assets and liabilities. Section 61.075(1) requires the trial court to “begin with the…distribution based on all relevant factors.” Section 61.075(3) provides that “any distribution of marital assets…reference to the factors enumerated in [section 61.075(1)].” Failure to make statutory findings is reversible…Husband raises five facial deficiencies under section 61.075. First, he asserts that the trial court erred

Ferdinand Frank v. Honiria Frank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-02T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: required by section 61.075(3), Florida Statutes (2022). Section 61.075(3)(c) states that

Kim Braddock v. City of Port Orange Pension Fund

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-02T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: rightly subject to equitable distribution, see § 61.075(6)(a)1.d., Fla. Stat. (2015), 2 any rights Kim

Christopher T. Knott v. Tracey L. Knott

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-06T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: consideration of the facts and circumstances presented. § 61.075(7), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“The date for determining… 8 Section 61.075(7), Florida Statutes (2021), states that “[t]he…whether they are subject to equitable distribution. § 61.075(7), Fla. Stat. (2018).”). This is true even if

Florence M. Bellegarde v. Yves Antoine O. Bellegarde

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-07T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: So. 2d 951, 953 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Section 61.075(7), Florida Statutes (2020), provides, “The date… rationale for the distribution . . . . § 61.075(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2020) (emphasis added). While

Smoot v. Smoot

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-12T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: party before the marriage are nonmarital assets. § 61.075(6)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2020). Here, the unrebutted

HINOJOSA v. HINOJOSA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: that remand is warranted on this basis.2 See § 61.075(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (requiring that a trial court

Kathy Deasy v. Kevin Deasy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: to the factors enumerated in subsection (1).” § 61.075(3), Fla. Stat. (2019). The distribution “shall …spouse shall be responsible for each liability.” § 61.075(3)(b), (c), Fla. Stat. (2019). Where the trial …individually by either spouse or jointly by them.” § 61.075(6)(a)1.a., Fla. Stat. (2019). However, “[a]ny liability…was subsequently ratified by the other spouse. § 61.075(6)(b)5., Fla. Stat. (2019). Here, the tax

VICKI MACPHERSON v. JOSEPH MACPHERSON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-10T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: distribution. See § 61.075(6), Fla. Stat. (2018). There is no provision in Section 61.075 permitting a party…the petition for dissolution of marriage. See § 61.075(7), Fla. Stat. (2018). The undisputed evidence…whether they are subject to equitable distribution. § 61.075(7), Fla. Stat. (2018). If an asset or liability…the applicable cut-off date mandated by Section 61.075(7), then the asset or liability cannot be distributed

DUHAMEL v. DUHAMEL

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-04-26T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: petition for dissolution of marriage is filed. § 61.075(7). However, the trial court must determine what

TAWANDA PRICE-LAWRENCE v. PHILLIP LAWRENCE, JR.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: relevant factors" listed in section 61.075(1)(a)-(j). § 61.075(1). …The trial court examined the factors in section 61.075(1)(a)-(j), Florida Statutes (2022), and found that…individually by either spouse or jointly by them." § 61.075(6)(a)1.a. A trial court shall distribute the parties… need to justify an unequal distribution. See § 61.075(1). The written final judgment itself is internally

William I. Siegmeister v. Joyce D. Hellard

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-13T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: supported by competent, substantial evidence. See § 61.075(3), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“[A]ny distribution of …reference to the factors enumerated in [section 61.075(1)]”); Apesteguy v. Keglevich, 319 So. 3d 150,

Haslauer v. Haslauer

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: having the status of being single and unmarried”); § 61.075(2), Fla. Stat. (stating that any award of a cash…party . . . but shall be treated as a debt”); § 61.075(4), Fla. Stat. (stating that the “judgment [equitably…in the county where the property is located”); § 61.075(9), Fla. Stat. (requiring trial court to “consider… of the judgment making the distribution. Cf. § 61.075(1), (3), Fla. Stat. (requiring presumption of equal…the court’s “rationale” for the distribution); § 61.075(5), Fla. Stat. (allowing for “interim partial distribution

JONI BARTOLOTTA v. ALAN BARTOLOTTA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-28T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: definition of a marital asset as provided by section 61.075(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), and section 61.076… II. Discussion 1 Section 61.075(5)(a) provided that marital assets are assets …definition for marital assets is now provided by section 61.075(6)(a). Section 61.076(1) provides that "…language of the MSA and its reliance on sections 61.075(5)(a) and 61.076(1) was erroneous. Two prior opinions… 6 defined in section 61.075(7), Florida Statutes (2009),"3 and was therefore

Rhonda Hines v. Arthur Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-21T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: the factors listed in section 61.075(1), as required by section 61.075(3) when a stipulation and agreement…not include factual findings required by section 61.075(1) and (3), Florida Statutes (2021), thus mandating…such statutorily required findings. Section 61.075(3) provides: In any contested dissolution…marital assets and allocation of liabilities. § 61.075(3), Fla. Stat. (2021) (emphases added). Here…findings referencing the factors enumerated in section 61.075(1), thus compelling reversal on that ground alone

Mishelle Addys Perdomo Vindel v. Scott Aron Stewart

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-07T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: distribution of marital assets because section 61.075, Florida Statutes (governing the equitable distribution…and are to be equitably distributed.”); § 61.075(6), Fla. Stat. Because they both jointly …the equitable distribution of marital assets. § 61.075, Fla. Stat. (“In a proceeding for

Leonard Brandon Pringle v. Ingrid Esther Pringle

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-12-13T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: court, based on its evaluation of the factors in § 61.075(1), Florida Statutes. Although the discretion… So. 3d 217, 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (quoting § 61.075(1), Fla. Stat. and Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 …trial court made lengthy findings pursuant to § 61.075(1), Florida Statutes, detailing the intentional

DENA SPECTOR v. SETH SPECTOR

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-10-11T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: remanded for further proceedings. to section 61.075, Florida Statutes] by failing to specifically raise

MICHAEL THOMAS SCHMIDT vs DANIELLE RENEE SCHMIDT

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-10-06T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: , 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020). Under section 61.075(1), Florida Statutes (2021), when distributing …enumerate its findings in accordance with section 61.075, but they do not support the inequitable distribution

Floridians Against Increased Rates, Inc. v. Gary F. Clark, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-09-28T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: relief from judgment terminating parental rights); § 61.075(3), Fla. Stat. (2023) (expressly requiring written