Home
Menu
904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 61.509 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 61.509 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 61.509

The 2023 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 61.509
61.509 Notice to persons outside the state.
(1) Notice required for the exercise of jurisdiction when a person is outside this state may be given in a manner prescribed by the laws of the state in which the service is made. Notice must be given in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice, but may be made by publication if other means are not effective.
(2) Proof of service may be made in the manner prescribed by the laws of the state in which the service is made.
(3) Notice is not required for the exercise of jurisdiction with respect to a person who submits to the jurisdiction of the court.
History.s. 5, ch. 2002-65.

F.S. 61.509 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.509 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.509


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.509
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.509.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All
  1. Bender v. Hornback

    322 So. 3d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
    (c) The person contesting registration was entitled to notice, but notice was not given in accordance with the standards of s. 61.509 in the proceedings before the court that issued the order for which registration is sought.
    PAGE 720
  2. Billie v. Stier

    141 So. 3d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
    In this case, the Circuit Court found that the Tribal Court did not substantially conform with the UCCJEA. Specifically, the Circuit Court relied on the fact that 1) the father did not receive notice of the reason for the proceedings in the Tribal Court as required by Section 61.509(3), Florida Statutes (2012), and he had not submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the Tribal Court; 2) at the temporary child custody hearing the father did not have the opportunity to be heard; 3) the father's attorney was not allowed into the tribal proceedings even as an observer; 4) although the father was allowed to attend the proceedings, he was unable to understand what was happening as the proceedings were conducted largely in the Miccosukee language and he was not given an interpreter; and 5) the mother testified in Miccosukee for over twenty minutes and the Tribal Court gave the father only a two-minute summary in English before granting temporary custody to the mother. We agree with the Circuit Court that those actions were not in substantial conformity with the UCCJEA.
    PAGE 587
  3. In this case, the Circuit Court found that the Tribal Court did not substantially conform with the UCCJEA. Specifically, the Circuit Court relied on the fact that 1) the father did not receive notice of the reason for the proceedings in the Tribal Court as required by Section 61.509(3), Florida Statutes (2012), and he had not submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the Tribal Court; 2) at the temporary child custody hearing the father did not have the opportunity to be heard; 3) the father's attorney was not allowed into the tribal proceedings even as an observer; 4) although the father was allowed to attend the proceedings, he was unable to understand what was happening as the proceedings were conducted largely in the Miccosukee language and he was not given an interpreter; and 5) the mother testified in Miccosukee for over twenty minutes and the Tribal Court gave the father only a two-minute summary in English before granting temporary custody to the mother. We agree with the Circuit Court that those actions were not in substantial conformity with the UCCJEA.
    PAGE 6
  4. Arthur v. Arthur

    54 So. 3d 454 (Fla. 2011)   Cited 31 times
    A child custody determination made by a court of this state which had jurisdiction under this part binds all persons who have been served in accordance with the laws of this state or notified in accordance with s. 61.509 or who have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, and who have been given an opportunity to be heard. As to those persons, the determination is conclusive as to all decided issues of law and fact except to the extent the determination is modified.
    PAGE 457
  5. In Interest of S.M

    874 So. 2d 720 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 1 times
    E.K. was originally named as a putative father at the inception of these proceedings, when the circuit court conducted an inquiry of the mother pursuant to section 39.503(1) regarding the father's identity. E.K. received notice of the proceedings under section 39.503(3). Section 39.502(7) specifically provides that "service of the summons and service of pleadings . . . on persons outside this state must be made pursuant to s. 61.509 [formerly § 61.1312.]," which is part of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), section 61.501-.542, Florida Statutes (2003). "Child custody proceedings," defined in section 61.503(4) of the UCCJEA, include proceedings for dependency or paternity in which the issue of legal or physical custody may appear. Furthermore, section 61.507 provides that if a person is validly served or given notice in accordance with section 61.509, and if the court has jurisdiction, the court's child custody determination "is conclusive as to all decided issues of law and fact except to the extent the determination is modified."
    PAGE 722

    Cases from cite.case.law:

    BILLIE, v. STIER,, 141 So. 3d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

    . . . did not receive notice of the reason for the proceedings in the Tribal Court as required by Section 61.509 . . .

    M. ARTHUR, v. A. ARTHUR,, 54 So. 3d 454 (Fla. 2010)

    . . . persons who have been served in accordance with the laws of this state or notified in accordance with s. 61.509 . . .

    In S. M. a E. K. v., 874 So. 2d 720 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

    . . . the summons and service of pleadings ... on persons outside this state must be made pursuant to s. 61.509 . . . section 61.507 provides that if a person is validly served or given notice in accordance with section 61.509 . . .