Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 61.57 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 61.57 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 61.57

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 61.57
61.57 Beginning, concluding, and terminating a collaborative law process.
(1) The collaborative law process begins, regardless of whether a legal proceeding is pending, when the parties enter into a collaborative law participation agreement.
(2) A tribunal may not order a party to participate in a collaborative law process over that party’s objection.
(3) A collaborative law process is concluded by any of the following:
(a) Resolution of a collaborative matter as evidenced by a signed record;
(b) Resolution of a part of the collaborative matter, evidenced by a signed record, in which the parties agree that the remaining parts of the collaborative matter will not be resolved in the collaborative law process; or
(c) Termination of the collaborative law process.
(4) A collaborative law process terminates when a party:
(a) Gives notice to the other parties in a record that the collaborative law process is concluded;
(b) Begins a proceeding related to a collaborative matter without the consent of all parties;
(c) Initiates a pleading, a motion, an order to show cause, or a request for a conference with a tribunal in a pending proceeding related to a collaborative matter;
(d) Requests that the proceeding be put on the tribunal’s active calendar in a pending proceeding related to a collaborative matter;
(e) Takes similar action requiring notice to be sent to the parties in a pending proceeding related to a collaborative matter; or
(f) Discharges a collaborative attorney or a collaborative attorney withdraws from further representation of a party, except as otherwise provided in subsection (7).
(5) A party’s collaborative attorney shall give prompt notice to all other parties in a record of a discharge or withdrawal.
(6) A party may terminate a collaborative law process with or without cause.
(7) Notwithstanding the discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative attorney, the collaborative law process continues if, not later than 30 days after the date that the notice of the discharge or withdrawal of a collaborative attorney required by subsection (5) is sent to the parties:
(a) The unrepresented party engages a successor collaborative attorney;
(b) The parties consent to continue the collaborative law process by reaffirming the collaborative law participation agreement in a signed record;
(c) The collaborative law participation agreement is amended to identify the successor collaborative attorney in a signed record; and
(d) The successor collaborative attorney confirms his or her representation of a party in the collaborative law participation agreement in a signed record.
(8) A collaborative law process does not conclude if, with the consent of the parties, a party requests a tribunal to approve a resolution of a collaborative matter or any part thereof as evidenced by a signed record.
(9) A collaborative law participation agreement may provide additional methods for concluding a collaborative law process.
History.s. 6, ch. 2016-93.

F.S. 61.57 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.57 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.57


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.57
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.57.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 61.57

Total Results: 3

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-02

Citation: 179 So. 3d 258, 2015 WL 7753054

Snippet: 70 .63 .73 ,73 .46 .82 Remedial Plan ' .74 .60 .61 .57 .73 .73 .46 .81 ■ _Polsby-Popper_ Legislature

Pentecost v. Ansan Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-01-25

Citation: 136 So. 2d 667

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Nellie Pentecost, has appealed a summary final judgment for the defendants Ansan Corporation and the City of Miami. Her complaint alleged that defendants were negligent in failing to remove an obstruction over which she fell. The court considered plaintiff’s deposition, photo*668graphs of the scene, a survey of the area, and an affidavit executed by a witness who arrived on the scene shortly after the occurrence of the accident. The sole question upon appeal is whether

Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph Langner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1949-11-01

Citation: 43 So. 2d 335, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1048

Snippet: Amer.Juris., Mechanics' Liens, Section 74, page 61; 57 C.J.S., Mechanics' Liens, § 42, page 533; Grainger