Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 63.0427 (2025)

Agreements for continued communication or contact between adopted child and siblings, parents, and other relatives.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

63.0427 Agreements for continued communication or contact between adopted child and siblings, parents, and other relatives.—

(1) A child whose parents have had their parental rights terminated and whose custody has been awarded to the department pursuant to s. 39.811, and who is the subject of a petition for adoption under this chapter, shall have the right to have the court consider the appropriateness of postadoption communication or contact, including, but not limited to, visits, written correspondence, or telephone calls, with his or her siblings or, upon agreement of the adoptive parents, with the parents who have had their parental rights terminated or other specified biological relatives. The court shall consider the following in making such determination:

(a) Any orders of the court pursuant to s. 39.811(7).

(b) Recommendations of the department, the foster parents if other than the adoptive parents, and the guardian ad litem.

(d) Any other information deemed relevant and material by the court.

If the court determines that the child’s best interests will be served by postadoption communication or contact, the court shall so order, stating the nature and frequency of the communication or contact. This order shall be made a part of the final adoption order, but the continuing validity of the adoption may not be contingent upon such postadoption communication or contact and the ability of the adoptive parents and child to change residence within or outside the State of Florida may not be impaired by such communication or contact.

(2) Notwithstanding s. 63.162, the adoptive parent may, at any time, petition for review of a communication or contact order entered pursuant to subsection (1), if the adoptive parent believes that the best interests of the adopted child are being compromised, and the court may order the communication or contact to be terminated or modified, as the court deems to be in the best interests of the adopted child; however, the court may not increase contact between the adopted child and siblings, birth parents, or other relatives without the consent of the adoptive parent or parents. As part of the review process, the court may order the parties to engage in mediation. The department shall not be required to be a party to such review.

History.—s. 3, ch. 98-50; s. 24, ch. 99-2; s. 52, ch. 99-193; s. 11, ch. 2001-3; s. 7, ch. 2003-58; s. 7, ch. 2012-81.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2009 · leading case: S.J. ex rel. M.W. v. W.L., 755 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

S.J. ex rel. M.W. v. W.L., 755 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · cites it 7× “Given the adopted minor’s statutory right under section 63.0427 to “have the court consider the appropriateness of pos-tadoption communication or contact, including, but limited to, visits, letters and cards, or telephone calls, with his or her sibling who are not included in…”

Quets v. Needham, 682 S.E.2d 214 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009). “]” Fla. Stat. § 63.0427 (1)(d) (2005). *255 Although the OAA stated that “the Birth Mother and the Adoptive Parents consent that this Agreement .”

Sj Ex Rel. Mw v. Wl, 755 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · cites it 7× “0427 to "have the court consider the appropriateness of postadoption communication or contact, including, but limited to, visits, letters and cards, or telephone calls, with his or her sibling who are not included in the petition for adoption," we do not foreclose the…”

— 63.0427(1) — 2 cases

S.J. ex rel. M.W. v. W.L., 755 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). “Given the adopted minor’s statutory right under section 63.0427 to “have the court consider the appropriateness of pos-tadoption communication or contact, including, but limited to, visits, letters and cards, or telephone calls, with his or her sibling who are not included in…”

Sj Ex Rel. Mw v. Wl, 755 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). “0427 to "have the court consider the appropriateness of postadoption communication or contact, including, but limited to, visits, letters and cards, or telephone calls, with his or her sibling who are not included in the petition for adoption," we do not foreclose the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.