Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 63.0427 - Full Text and Legal Analysis Florida Statute 63.0427 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Fla. Stat. § 63.0427 (2026) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Amendments
63.0427 Agreements for continued communication or contact between adopted child and siblings, parents, and other relatives.
(1) A child whose parents have had their parental rights terminated and whose custody has been awarded to the department pursuant to s. 39.811, and who is the subject of a petition for adoption under this chapter, shall have the right to have the court consider the appropriateness of postadoption communication or contact, including, but not limited to, visits, written correspondence, or telephone calls, with his or her siblings or, upon agreement of the adoptive parents, with the parents who have had their parental rights terminated or other specified biological relatives. The court shall consider the following in making such determination:
(a) Any orders of the court pursuant to s. 39.811(7).
(b) Recommendations of the department, the foster parents if other than the adoptive parents, and the guardian ad litem.
(c) Statements of the prospective adoptive parents.
(d) Any other information deemed relevant and material by the court.

If the court determines that the child’s best interests will be served by postadoption communication or contact, the court shall so order, stating the nature and frequency of the communication or contact. This order shall be made a part of the final adoption order, but the continuing validity of the adoption may not be contingent upon such postadoption communication or contact and the ability of the adoptive parents and child to change residence within or outside the State of Florida may not be impaired by such communication or contact.

(2) Notwithstanding s. 63.162, the adoptive parent may, at any time, petition for review of a communication or contact order entered pursuant to subsection (1), if the adoptive parent believes that the best interests of the adopted child are being compromised, and the court may order the communication or contact to be terminated or modified, as the court deems to be in the best interests of the adopted child; however, the court may not increase contact between the adopted child and siblings, birth parents, or other relatives without the consent of the adoptive parent or parents. As part of the review process, the court may order the parties to engage in mediation. The department shall not be required to be a party to such review.
History.s. 3, ch. 98-50; s. 24, ch. 99-2; s. 52, ch. 99-193; s. 11, ch. 2001-3; s. 7, ch. 2003-58; s. 7, ch. 2012-81.

Cases Citing F.S. 63.0427

Copy

Sj Ex Rel. Mw v. Wl, 755 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 314472

...ore concluding, we note that the court expressed its concern that the siblings, who asserted a desire for visitation with the adopted minor, have an opportunity to get to know each other in the future. Given the adopted minor's statutory right under section 63.0427 to "have the court consider the appropriateness of postadoption communication or contact, including, but limited to, visits, letters and cards, or telephone calls, with his or her sibling who are not included in the petition for adopt...
...and contact with their sibling after the adoption becomes final. It is clear that a final order of adoption severs all legal relationships between the adopted child and her blood relatives. See § 63.172(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). On the other hand, section 63.0427 also provides that: "A child ......
...right to have the court consider the appropriateness of postadoption communication or contact, including, but not limited to, visits, letters and cards, or telephone calls, with his or her siblings who are not included in the petition for adoption." § 63.0427(1), Fla....
...Hence, focusing only on the statutory text, I would deem irrelevant whether the children had any history of communicating or contact, at least as regards the distinct question whether the siblings themselves can raise the issue of future contacts. I think that section 63.0427 carries over a corresponding interest of the adopted child's siblings to have the court consider future contacts after the adoption is final....
...An associational right is necessarily reciprocal: A has the right to associate in some way with B; it corresponds with a right of B to associate with A. If B has no right to associate with A, A 's associational right is meaningless as regards B. One is useless without the other. Thus, I construe section 63.0427 to create an associational interest among biological siblings, at least to the extent of having the court presiding over the adoption of one of them to consider the subject of *758 continued contact among them even after the adoption...
...to the future possibility of such contacts. And while it is true that section 63.022 is merely a statement of legislative intent and does not purport in so many words to "provide a basis for legal standing," that same construction cannot be said of section 63.0427, which does provide such a basis....
Copy

·S.J. ex rel. M.W. v. W.L., 755 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3682

...e concluding, we note that the court expressed its concern that the siblings, who asserted a desire for visitation with the adopted minor, have an opportunity to get to know each other in the future. Given the adopted minor’s statutory right under section 63.0427 to “have the court consider the appropriateness of pos-tadoption communication or contact, including, but limited to, visits, letters and cards, or telephone calls, with his or her sibling who are not included in the petition for ad...
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityYh (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityY.H. (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham Syfert, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.