The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . both employers are liable for workers' compensation. 2 Larson's Workers' Compensation, Desk Edition § 68.01 . . .
. . . Alexander, 982 So.2d 1013, 1026 n. 8 (Miss.Ct.App.2008) (quoting Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 68.01 . . .
. . . Section 68.01, Florida Statutes (2000), captioned "Declaring tax assessment invalid," would not appear . . .
. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.01[1], at 843 (14th ed.1978). . . . .
. . . Section 68.01 provides that “[a]ny person having a substantial interest which is adversely affected by . . .
. . . . §§ 68.01-68.092. (Docket No.). . . .
. . . No. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 183, (1977); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.01 page 843 (James Wm. . . .
. . . DOR points out that “tax cases” have been made the subject of equity jurisdiction by section 68.01, Florida . . . provides for circuit court jurisdiction in challenges to certain specified taxes and assessments, section 68.01 . . . The scope of cases involving challenges as contemplated by section 68.01, and its predecessors, have . . . In the present case DOR argues that section 68.01 controls our determination of whether section 72.011 . . . We are cited to no instances, however, in which the procedure contemplated by section 68.01 has been . . .
. . . that mutual debts “may be set off against [each] other,” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 68.01 . . .
. . . . § 68.01-6, provides further that: (a) To be formally qualified as [a Bo-waters] corporation for all . . . [the Act], the Commandant will furnish the corporation a Certificate of Compliance....” 46 C.F.R. § 68.01 . . .
. . . . § 68.01-5(b) (1987). . . . an 883-1 corporation for all purposes under the Act, a corporation which meets the requirements of § 68.01 . . . this section, the Commandant will furnish the corporation a Certificate of Compliance ____ 46 C.F.R. § 68.01 . . .
. . . Age 28 Age 27 535.67 + 55.00 fee $52.25 $100.00 $56.52 $149.44 1981 Age 29 Age 28 544.71 + $5.00 fee $68.01 . . .
. . . Note of 1946 Amendment to Rule of Federal Civil Procedure 68; see also 7 Moore’s Federal Practice §§ 68.01 . . .
. . . . §§ 68.01-16 are specifically designed “to afford a constitutionally sufficient ... review in connection . . . Stats. § 68.01 (1983). . . .
. . . .) § 68.01 at 843-44. . . . .
. . . .) § 68.01 at 843-44. .The Bankruptcy Court’s analysis of this issue is fundamentally flawed because . . .
. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 68.01, p. 68-3 (1979). . . .
. . . His federal benefit amounted to $68.01 per week, and his Chapter 440 benefit was $90.72 per week. . . .
. . . doctrine of American bankruptcy law with the passage of the Act of 1800. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.01 . . .
. . . . § 68.01-10 at the time of the collision). . . .
. . . Boylston Nat’l Bank, supra; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, H 68.01, at 848. . . .
. . . Massey, 192 U.S. 138, 148, 24 S.Ct. 199, 48 L.Ed. 380 (1904); 4 Collier, Bankruptcy K 68.01[3] at 846 . . . See 4 Collier, supra H 68.01[3] at 844-48. . . . See 4 Collier, supra fl 68.01[1] at 843 — 44. . . . .
. . . See gen. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 68.01 (14th Ed. 1975): 3 Remington on Bankruptcy § 1431 (1908). . . .
. . . Appellant also contends on appeal that the IRS erred in Imposing a $68.01 penalty. . . .
. . . Section 68.01, Florida Statutes, provides that when an assessment is made against a corporation and payment . . .
. . . The items of outside costs not verified were: Discounts taken_ $68.01 Eastman Kodak portion of Wexler . . .
. . . . §§ 68.01-10 et seq.). . . .
. . . Proe. 68 and 7 Moore, Federal Practice §§68.01-68.06 (1966). . . .
. . . to the bankrupt has been recognized in American Bankruptcy law since 1800. 4 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 68.01 . . .
. . . . § 68.01-1 (1962). 11. . . .
. . . more than import the time-honored doctrine of equitable setoff into the bankruptcy law. 4 Collier §§ 68.01 . . .
. . . See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., § 60.16, p. 805; 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., § 68.01, p . . .
. . . See Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Secs. 60.15, 68.01. . . .
. . . Kraus had a good and lawful lien against said lots of land for the following sums, to wit: The sum of $68.01 . . . Kraus, for the following amounts, respectively, to wit: Lot 1 for $68.01; lot 2 for $67.44, and lot 3 . . . Kraus for $68.01, in pursuance of the judgment of foreclosure entered in the suit brought by Kraus, and . . .