Syfert Injury Law Firm

Tavares J. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-16

Citation: 213 So. 3d 881, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 343, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 586

Snippet: and 76 with 95% confidence and a range of 68.5 and 73.5 with a 68% confidence .... Even when a

Tavares J. Wright v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-23

Snippet: and 76 with 95% confidence and a range of 68.5 and 73.5 with a 68% confidence. . . . Even

BD. OF TRUSTEES OF STATE UNIV. v. Esposito

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-08-15

Citation: 991 So. 2d 924, 2008 WL 3540213

Snippet: cross appeal that the $100,000.00 cap in section 768.68(5), referenced in section 760.11(5), applies only

Honeycutt v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-12-05

Citation: 805 So. 2d 987, 2001 WL 1539623

Snippet: proper 1994 scoresheet would be in the range of 68.5 months, instead of the 96 months imposed. The trial

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas Gordon & Associates, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-02-28

Citation: 789 So. 2d 360, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2137, 2001 WL 194079

Snippet: the allegations of its motion for writ. See § 78.068(5), Florida Statutes (1987). Here, it is undisputed

Schrimsher v. School Bd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-06-04

Citation: 694 So. 2d 856, 1997 WL 295277

Snippet: in the reviewing court. Section 120.57(1)(b); 120.68(5)(a). The hearing officer's findings are indisputably

Rose v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-07

Citation: 675 So. 2d 567, 1996 WL 97463

Snippet: outcome. 466 U.S. at 693-94, 104 S.Ct. at 2067-68. [5] The strategy appears to be closely akin to a

Koehler v. Roberts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-10-11

Citation: 661 So. 2d 374, 1995 WL 594944

Snippet: should comply with the requirements of section 68.05, Florida Statutes (1991). CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and

Pinacoteca Corp. v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS REG.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-05

Citation: 580 So. 2d 881, 1991 WL 92954

Snippet: the four corners of the order itself. See § 120.68(5)(c), Fla. Stat. (1989); Pure Fresh Enter., Inc.

Manasota-88, Inc. v. State, Department of Environmental Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-04-23

Citation: 567 So. 2d 895, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2790, 1990 WL 48656

Snippet: 54(3)(a), (6), and (ll)(a), Fla.Stat.; section 120.68(5)(b), Fla.Stat. Id. at 1270. A proper record from

Adam Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF ENV. REG.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-11-22

Citation: 553 So. 2d 1260

Snippet: and rules entered or adopted by the agency); § 120.68(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (record for judicial review shall

Wendell v. Wilshire Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-06-07

Citation: 544 So. 2d 320, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1373, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3213, 1989 WL 58720

Snippet: a claim of indebtedness as required by section 68.05, Florida Statutes, which provides: Creditors’ bills

Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Bradley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-08-05

Citation: 510 So. 2d 1122, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1899, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9638

Snippet: Procedure, in resolving this dispute.[1] Section 120.68(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), provides that "[t]he

Cerna v. Swiss Bank Corp.(Overseas), SA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-02-10

Citation: 503 So. 2d 1297, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 485

Snippet: prerequisites for the maintenance of a creditors' bill, § 68.05, Fla. Stat. (1985),[1] which, contrary to common

Smith v. Daniel Mones, P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-11-27

Citation: 459 So. 2d 462, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2528, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15967

Snippet: instituted a creditor’s bill pursuant to Section 68.05 of the Florida Statutes (1983). The *463causes were

Mills v. Lawhon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-16

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1162, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12712

Snippet: Thereafter, she filed a creditor’s bill under Section 68.05, Florida Statutes (1981), against the estate of

LANDMARK FIRST NAT. BK. v. Beach Bait and Tackle Shop, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-10-05

Citation: 449 So. 2d 1287

Snippet: "may" and "shall." See, e.g., §§ 78.068(1) and 78.068(5). Furthermore, throughout chapter 78 the drafters

Arlotta v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-09-29

Citation: 419 So. 2d 1159, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21334

Snippet: motion to strike appellant’s appendix. Section 120.68(5)(c), Fla.Stat. (1981), dictates that the record

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-11-03

Snippet: In your letter you refer to the provisions of ch. 68-5, Laws of Florida, which, when transferring the responsibilities

Daniels v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-08-19

Citation: 401 So. 2d 1351

Snippet: and used as a basis for its action. Section 120.68(5)(c), Fla. Stat. However, since the issues that may