Florida Statute 68.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 68.06

68.06 Actions upon negotiable and other instruments; consideration, etc.—All bonds, notes, covenants, deeds, bills of exchange, and other written instruments not under seal have the same force and effect (so far as the rules of pleading and evidence are concerned) as bonds and instruments under seal. The assignment or endorsement of any instrument vests the assignee or endorsee with the same rights, powers, and capacities as were possessed by the assignor or endorser. The assignee or endorsee may bring action thereon. It is not necessary for the plaintiff in any action on an instrument assignable by law to allege the consideration on which the instrument was given or on which the assignment or endorsement was made nor to prove the consideration or the execution of the instrument, unless it is denied by the defendant under oath. An executor or administrator may deny the execution or consideration by answer not under oath.

History.—ss. 24, 33, 36, Nov. 23, 1828; RS 1073; GS 1465; RGS 2664; CGL 4330; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 22, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 52.08.

F.S. 68.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 68.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 68.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 68.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 68.06

Total Results: 20

C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-13

Snippet: III. Pursuant to section 120.68(6)(a)1., Florida Statutes, we reverse the portion

Floridians Against Increased Rates, Inc. v. Gary F. Clark, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-28

Snippet: case for further agency proceedings. See § 120.68(6)(a)1. On other occasions, we have recognized our

Donna Leah T. Brewer, LPN v. Florida Department of Health, Board of Nursing

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-28

Citation: 268 So. 3d 871

Snippet: proceedings consistent with this opinion. See § 120.68(6)(a)1., Florida Statutes. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and

Marion County v. Department of Juvenile Justice

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-04-04

Citation: 215 So. 3d 621

Snippet: under section 120.68(7). Under section 120.68(6)(a), “[t]he reviewing court’s decision may be mandatory

Citizens of the State of Florida v. Art Graham, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-16

Citation: 213 So. 3d 703, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 312, 2017 WL 1021849, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 585

Snippet: explained by the agency, and in violation of section 120.68(6)(e)3., Florida Statutes); Gen. Dev. Corp. v. Div

McCloskey v. Department of Financial Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-08-21

Citation: 172 So. 3d 973, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12559, 2015 WL 4950094

Snippet: justification.10 Accordingly, pursuant to section 120.68(6)(a) Florida Statutes (2014), we reverse the final

Failer v. State, Department of Health

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-04-22

Citation: 139 So. 3d 359, 2014 WL 1600453, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5742

Snippet: matter for additional agency proceedings. § 120.68(6)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2013). In his petition for judicial

Delemos v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-11-28

Citation: 969 So. 2d 544, 2007 WL 4180879

Snippet: pronouncement and Ashley had begun to serve it. Id. at 1267-68.[6] Once a sentence is orally pronounced and the defendant

Leibow v. Florida Department of Children & Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-02-02

Citation: 891 So. 2d 1203, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 951, 2005 WL 236174

Snippet: days for cash assistance claims). . Chapter 120.68(6)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2002) (Florida's Administrative

GEL Corp. v. Dept. of Environmental Protection

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-06-04

Citation: 875 So. 2d 1257, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7940

Snippet: 105 (Fla.2002) (citation omitted); see also § 120.68(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000) ("The reviewing court's decision

MIAMI-DADE CTY. SCHOOL BOARD v. J. Ruiz School Bus Service, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-05-19

Citation: 874 So. 2d 59, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6980, 2004 WL 1106783

Snippet: wrongfully taken or withheld official action. See § 120.68(6)(a) 2., Fla. Stat. (1999). Neither the Act nor Florida

JB Intern., Inc. v. Mega Flight, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-03-28

Citation: 840 So. 2d 1147, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4101, 2003 WL 1566499

Snippet: his claim of right to immediate possession. § 78.068(6), Fla. Stat. (1989). This is made abundantly clear

Jalaskari v. Bank of Nova Scotia

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-01-11

Citation: 802 So. 2d 1220, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 131, 2002 WL 27262

Snippet: filing a contradictory motion under section 78.068(6). We reject this position and conclude a party who

Lennox Retail, Inc. v. McMillan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-06-15

Citation: 786 So. 2d 1252, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8082, 2001 WL 667679

Snippet: successful in meeting its burden under section 78.068(6) of proving the grounds upon which the writ was

McIntyre v. Seminole County School Bd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-03-09

Citation: 779 So. 2d 639, 17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 583, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2951, 2001 WL 227363

Snippet: 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (citing Fla. Stat. § 120.68(6); Mitchell v. School Bd. of Leon County, 347 So

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas Gordon & Associates, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-02-28

Citation: 789 So. 2d 360, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2137, 2001 WL 194079

Snippet: filing a motion as authorized by statute. See § 78.068(6), Fla.Stat. (1987). Instead, Thomas Gordon Associates

Hernandez v. Trout Creek Development Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-04-12

Citation: 779 So. 2d 360, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4221, 2000 WL 367744

Snippet: party, that is, the homeowners’ association. See § 68.06, Fla. Stat. (1997). The association’s authority

Nordheim v. Dept. of Env. Protection

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-09-16

Citation: 719 So. 2d 1212

Snippet: agency practice" not explained by the agency. § 120.68(6)(e)3., Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). This is a case which

Liberty Care Plan v. Department of Insurance

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-05-05

Citation: 710 So. 2d 202, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4849, 1998 WL 216047

Snippet: an evi-dentiary hearing pursuant to section 120.68(6), Florida Statutes (1995), and supersedeas pursuant

Pou v. Department of Insurance & Treasurer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-03-18

Citation: 707 So. 2d 941, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2680, 1998 WL 117301

Snippet: findings of the administrative law judge. See § 120.68(6)(b), Fla. Stat. After consideration of the record