Florida Statute 71.031 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 71
REESTABLISHMENT OF DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 71.031

71.031 Reestablishment of proceedings in pending actions.—Lost or destroyed proceedings and any paper or file affecting them in any actions pending and undetermined in any court may be reestablished by the person desiring reestablishment by filing a copy of the proceedings, paper or file in chancery and giving 10 days’ written notice to all parties to the action of the application for reestablishment of the proceedings, paper or file. On the hearing the judge shall ascertain the facts and determine the application.

History.—s. 6, ch. 1735, 1870; RS 1532; GS 1996; RGS 3264; CGL 5072; s. 24, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 71.13.

F.S. 71.031 on Google Scholar

F.S. 71.031 on Casetext

Amendments to 71.031

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 71.031

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 71.031.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 71.031

Total Results: 5

State v. Hellmond

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-08-14

Citation: 683 So. 2d 524, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8378, 1996 WL 460721

Snippet: antiquity also address the point. See §§ 71.011(5), 71.031, Fla.Stat. (1995).1 The state filed a motion to

Richards v. Finlay

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-03-09

Citation: 259 So. 2d 167, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7049

Snippet: OWEN, Judge. The appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Finlay, struck up a conversation with Donn A. Wolfe in a bar, and before the day was over they had signed a five-year lease on his $40,000 home on the intercoastal waterway in Pompano, Florida at a rental of $50 per month, furnished. The Finlays spent three or four weeks cleaning and repairing to make the premises habitable and had just moved in when they received notice from appellant, Henry S. Richards, advising them that he was the owner of the premises

Daniels v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-09-24

Citation: 252 So. 2d 574

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Nelson v. O’Neil, 1971, 402 U.S. 622, 91 S.Ct. 1723, 29 L.Ed.2d 222. PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Prohaska v. Colonial Leasing Co. of New England

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-01-28

Citation: 243 So. 2d 258, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 7407

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed.

State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Sloan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-11-28

Citation: 184 So. 781, 135 Fla. 179, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1529

Snippet: that the face value of the said certificate is $71.31, as will be more fully shown by reference to a copy