Florida Statute 73.014 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 73
EMINENT DOMAIN

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 73.014

73.014 Taking property to eliminate nuisance, slum, or blight conditions prohibited.—

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any charter provision, ordinance, statute, or special law, the state, any political subdivision as defined in s. 1.01(8), or any other entity to which the power of eminent domain is delegated may not exercise the power of eminent domain to take private property for the purpose of abating or eliminating a public nuisance. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any charter provision, ordinance, statute, or special law, abating or eliminating a public nuisance is not a valid public purpose or use for which private property may be taken by eminent domain and does not satisfy the public purpose requirement of s. 6(a), Art. X of the State Constitution. This subsection does not diminish the power of counties or municipalities to adopt or enforce county or municipal ordinances related to code enforcement or the elimination of public nuisances to the extent such ordinances do not authorize the taking of private property by eminent domain.

(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any charter provision, ordinance, statute, or special law, the state, any political subdivision as defined in s. 1.01(8), or any other entity to which the power of eminent domain is delegated may not exercise the power of eminent domain to take private property for the purpose of preventing or eliminating slum or blight conditions. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any charter provision, ordinance, statute, or special law, taking private property for the purpose of preventing or eliminating slum or blight conditions is not a valid public purpose or use for which private property may be taken by eminent domain and does not satisfy the public purpose requirement of s. 6(a), Art. X of the State Constitution.

History.—s. 2, ch. 2006-11.

F.S. 73.014 on Google Scholar

F.S. 73.014 on Casetext

Amendments to 73.014

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 73.014

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 73.014.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 73.014

Total Results: 20

Andrew Michael Gosciminski v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 262 So. 3d 47

Snippet: 13. IRCL-73, metal support ring (Exhibit 73) 14. IRCL-74, section of statue head (Exhibit 74)

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2009-09-15T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Fla. 89-14 (1989), 81-05 (1981), 73-399 (1973), 73-14 (1973), 72-281 (1972), and 70-102 (1970). 7 Sections

City of Hollywood Community Redevelopment Agency v. 1843, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-03-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 980 So. 2d 1138, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4357, 2008 WL 782614

Snippet: slum or blight. Id. This can no longer be done. § 73.014, Fla. Stat. (2006). Today, private property taken…then the Mach property could not be condemned. § 73.014, Fla. Stat. (2006). However, this statute is not

In the Interest of B.P.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-02-01T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 538 So. 2d 73, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 368, 1989 WL 6251

Snippet: Glickstein, Stone, Walden 1 February 1989 538 So. 2d 73, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 349, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 368, 1989

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-12-07T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Opinions 86-84; 77-63. See also, AGO's 73-398; 73-14. In AGO 77-63, this office concluded that a non-

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-09-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: of a private citizen. See AGO's 73-398 and 73-14. Numerous opinions of the Attorney General have

The Florida Bar v. Fields

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1986-01-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 482 So. 2d 1354

Snippet: copy of a staff opinion enclosing Ethics Opinion 73-14 to paragraph 5 of his affirmative defenses to the

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1977-06-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: of a private citizen. See AGO 073-398; cf. AGO 073-14. It is assumed for the purposes of this inquiry

In re Advisory Opinion of the Governor

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1974-10-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 302 So. 2d 748, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4656

Snippet: opinion that the above-quoted provisions of Chapter 73^-14 construed together mean that the act became effective

City of Punta Gorda v. McSmith, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-03-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 294 So. 2d 27

Snippet: McSMITH, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee. No. 73-14. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District…JOANOS, JAMES E., Associate Judge, concur. 73-14 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Sewell v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1973-10-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 283 So. 2d 915, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 9184

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. No. 73-14 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp Fla

Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Fuller

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1973-04-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 275 So. 2d 568

Snippet: STATES, Appellant, v. Allen FULLER, Appellee. No. 73-14. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District…class action feature. It is so ordered. 73-14 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Duval Connecting Railroad

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-11-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 193 So. 2d 19, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4698

Snippet: operate as a supersedeas in view of F.S. §§ 73.13 and 73.14, F.S.A. As to the first of these contentions we

Robbins v. Cipes

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1966-01-04T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 181 So. 2d 521

Snippet: , see 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., § 73.14, p. 3160, and Supplement thereto. [5] State ex

Hillsborough County v. Bennett

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-09-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 167 So. 2d 800

Snippet: Appellees urged that provisions of Fla.Stat. § 73.14, F.S.A. with respect td the time for filing an appeal

State Road Department v. White

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1964-03-10T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 161 So. 2d 828

Snippet: the time for filing notice of appeal under F.S. § 73.14, F.S.A. The point has been settled adversely to

Dean v. State Road Department

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1963-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 156 So. 2d 649, 1963 Fla. LEXIS 2692

Snippet: supra, rather than Section 73.14. In that decision we recognized that Section 73.14, supra, is applicable …eminent domain proceedings is governed by Section 73.14, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., or by Section 59.08, …opinion that the appeal was governed by Section 73.14, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the District Court dismissed…decision the District Court concluded that Section 73.14, supra, governing appeals from “final judgments”…new trial is within the contemplation of Section 73.14, supra, governing appeals from- “final judgments

Rich v. Harper Neon Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-11-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 147 So. 2d 174

Snippet: separate opinions to be filed this date. *175Section 73.14, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which relates to eminent

Rich v. Harper Neon Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-11-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 147 So. 2d 176

Snippet: required by the eminent domain statute, F.S. § 73.14, F.S.A. The petitioner’s remedy was by appeal, which…within the 30 day period provided for review under § 73.14. See Taylor v. Board of Public Instruction of Duval

Dean v. State Road Department

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-09-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 144 So. 2d 867

Snippet: , contending that same was untimely filed, as § 73.14, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. provides a 30-day time limit …notwithstanding the 30-day limitation contained in § 73.14, Fla. Stat. It appears that the motion to dismiss…review in a given proceeding. In the instant case, § 73.14, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.,2 prescribes a 30-day appeal