The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and awarded Defendants $15,000 in attorneys’ fees and $76.06 . . .
. . . in 2009, pursuant to orders from the superior court of Montgomery County, Georgia, Arthur Sharpe’s 76.06 . . . (“Tidal Water”) Arthur Sharpe’s 76.06 acres of land, presumably as Holloway’s assign. . . .
. . . in 2009, pursuant to orders from the superior court of Montgomery County, Georgia, Arthur Sharpe’s 76.06 . . . (“Tidal Water”) Arthur Sharpe’s 76.06 acres of land, presumably as Holloway’s assign. . . .
. . . P. 76.06(c). 2. . . . Rule 76.06(c) states: “Tangible Personal Property Where Seizure is Impracticable. . . . argument, the trustee posits that the sheriff did not post a proper notice of levy as required by Rule 76.06 . . . but ultimately concluded that the posting of the execution application and order complied with Rule 76.06 . . .
. . . Therefore, I find that the posting this document next to the Boat Slip complied with Rule 76.06(c). . . . P. 76.06(c). . Mo. R. Civ. P. 76.07. . Mo, R. Civ. P. 76.075(a) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Glendale Traffic Code § 76.06. . . .
. . . of the Lower Hudson Valley Zone using a reference value for the cost of a new peaking plant of only 76.06 . . . proceeding, NYISO proposed to phase in the demand curve for the new zone by discounting the demand curve to 76.06 . . .
. . . received a notice from the Glendale police that his car was in violation of Glendale Traffic Code § 76.06 . . . Pagan I: we did reach the merits of Pagan’s claim and we decided them in Pagan’s favor, holding section 76.06 . . . Consequently, we held that the “absence of any evidence of the need for regulation ... is fatal to section 76.06 . . . all reasonable doubt as to our holding or the nature of the remand we ordered: we struck down section 76.06 . . .
. . . Glendale, Ohio (“Glendale” or “the Village”) and Glendale Police Chief Matt Fruchey, alleging that section 76.06 . . . Department noticed the sign, notified Pagan that the sign was a violation of Glendale Traffic Code § 76.06 . . . , and asked him to remove it or face being cited for a municipal violation; Section 76.06 reads as follows . . . Both before the district court and before us on appeal, Pagan has argued that subsections 76.06(A) and . . . It is the absence of any evidence of the need for regulation that is fatal to section 76.06. . . .
. . . In applying the above rationale, $17,946.50 of the claimed fees and $76.06 of the claimed expenses are . . .
. . . See generally 4 Larson, Employment Discrimination § 76.06 (2d ed. 2000) (collecting dozens of cases). . . .
. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination § 76.06[l][b] (2d ed. 1997) (“[A] complaint alleging race discrimination . . .
. . . . § 400.8-317(1); Mo.R.Civ.P. 76.06. . . .
. . . Missouri law because Landmark failed to seize the stock as required by Missouri Supreme Court Rule 76.06 . . .
. . . See Mo.S.Ct.R. 76.06(f); Mo.Rev.Stat. § 400.8-317(1). . . . See Mo.S.Ct.R. 85.21 (may attach as provided in Rule 76), 76.06(f) (“levy upon property subject to garnishment . . .
. . . Bankr.E.D.Pa.1980); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 501.01, 502.01, 506.07; 3 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 76.06 . . . , Inc., 3 B.R. at 341-42; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy II 506.04; 3 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 76.06 . . .
. . . (c) Expenses Requested (i) The following expenses are requested: Postage: 3-31-86 Mass Mailing $ 76.06 . . .
. . . [see Collier on Bankruptcy par. 1322.01 (15th ed.) 1322-8; 3 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, § 76.06 . . .
. . . Senate, the population per district varies from 354,311 to 808,063 or from 22.80% overrepresented to 76.06% . . .
. . . See F.R.Civ.Pro. 4(f); V.A.M.R. 76.06; Globe Indemnity Co. v. . . .
. . . Johnson, Federal Income, Gift & Estate Taxation (1976) §§ 72.02(1) & 76.06(5); Am.Jur.2d Federal Taxation . . .
. . . .-.1014-76.06 It should be noted that in two instances — pins and end connectors — the specifications . . .
. . . Workweeks Ending Amount Due Elizabeth Adolph 10/1/65 to 12/31/65 $ 65.54 Helen Rule 10/8/65 to 12/31/65 76.06 . . .
. . . determined the amount of the tax due from the estate to be' $21,591.16, which amount, plus interest of $76.06 . . .