Florida Statute 76.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 76.06

76.06 Effect of attachment upon unmatured debt.—In attachments for debts not due, under s. 76.05, the existence of one or more of the special grounds assigned, and in case of attachment against executors or administrators for a debt not due, the existence of all the grounds assigned, shall cause the debt to become due, and plaintiff may proceed as on a debt falling due on a day before commencement of the action.

History.—RS 1647; GS 2111; RGS 3412; CGL 5265; s. 26, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 76.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 76.06

Total Results: 20

Michael Lawrence Woodbury v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-15

Snippet: defense without the help of counsel.” Id. at 175-76. 6 In Florida, Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(3)

SHAREE BAILEY v. ARVA COVINGTON

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-07

Snippet: of $42,191.37, plus the $3,679.76. 6 Standard of Review The

Coleman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-08

Citation: 53 So. 3d 1052, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18623, 2010 WL 4967473

Snippet: promptly comply waives the right of subrogation. § 768.76(6)-(7), Fla. Stat. Thus, the law substantially affects

Amison v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-04-01

Citation: 5 So. 3d 798, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2906, 2009 WL 839031

Snippet: (Emphasis added.) The applicable version of section 372.76,6 entitled “Search and *801seizure authorized and

Miller v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-05-18

Citation: 932 So. 2d 1028, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 310, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 891, 2006 WL 1375241

Snippet: with proper notice of cancellation. Id. at 575-76.[6] In Southern Group Indemnity, Inc. v. Cullen, 831

Walker v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-02-24

Citation: 896 So. 2d 712, 2005 WL 425409

Snippet: Penal Law § 165.55 (Consol.2003); Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-402 (2003). [3] The history of section 812.022(2)

Murphy v. Centlivre

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-07-09

Citation: 850 So. 2d 600, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10219, 2003 WL 21536983

Snippet: intent to claim damages pursuant *601to section 768.76(6), Florida Statutes, upon health providers, Health

Grubb v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-01-25

Citation: 748 So. 2d 395, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 2000 WL 51822

Snippet: sentenced him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 76.6 months, with 432 days credit for time served. We

State v. Hicks

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-10-28

Citation: 421 So. 2d 510

Snippet: Tex.Penal Code § 30.02 (1974); Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-202 (1978); Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.52.020, .030 (1981);

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-11-24

Snippet: be made immediately or on fresh pursuit. See AGO 076-6 concluding that a traffic infraction as defined

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-10-29

Snippet: rather than the advancement of such funds. See s. 394.76(6), which provides that claims for statereimbursement

Moore v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-03-20

Citation: 368 So. 2d 664, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14381

Snippet: various experiences of back pain throughout 1974-76, (6) a January, 1976, car accident in which he sustained

The Florida Bar v. Blaha

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-12-21

Citation: 366 So. 2d 433, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 5073

Snippet: Florida Bar's Integration Rule. As to COUNT III 5B-76-6 By clear and convincing evidence Respondent George

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-09-21

Snippet: also refer you to the method set forth in s. 394.76(6), F. S. (1976 Supp.), for state reimbursement which

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-07-27

Snippet: as contemplated in s. 901.15(5), F. S., see AGO 076-6, although the alleged traffic offender ordinarily

State Ex Rel. Dept. of General Serv. v. Willis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-29

Citation: 344 So. 2d 580

Snippet: 72(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1976). [9] E.g., §§ 573.76(6), regulating foliage plant marketing; 573.882(6)

Mannarino v. Mount Sinai Hospital

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-07

Citation: 340 So. 2d 509, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16058

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Roth v. Dade County, 71 So.2d 169 (Fla.1954); Traurig v. Spear, 102 So.2d 165, 170 (Fla.3rd DCA 1958); Brooks v. Plant, 296 So.2d 71 (Fla.2nd DCA 1974); Anderson v. Gordon, 334 So.2d 107 (Fla.3rd DCA 1976).