Florida Statute 76.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 76.07

76.07 Attachment in aid of foreclosure.—Any creditor who is commencing or has commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage on personal property may have an attachment against the property, when the creditor has reason to believe and does believe that:

(1) The property or part of it will be concealed or disposed of so that it will not be forthcoming to answer a judgment on foreclosure.

(2) The property or part of it will be removed beyond the jurisdiction of the court.

(3) The property or part of it is of a perishable character and is being used and consumed by the mortgagor or other parties.

(4) The property or part of it has been disposed of without the consent of the party holding the mortgage, and stating who has the property, if known and if not known, that he or she does not know who has it.

History.—s. 6, Dec. 11, 1824; RS 1640; GS 2104; RGS 3405; s. 1, ch. 8477, 1921; CGL 5258; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 373, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 76.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 76.07

Total Results: 20

Devin Lee Bass v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-14

Snippet: violation of section 843.02. D.G., 661 So. 2d at 76. 7 The State relies on stricken trial testimony

Leighdon Henry v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-19

Citation: 175 So. 3d 675, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 147, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 533

Snippet: Eighth Amendment. Id. at 76. -7- In so doing, the Supreme

Kritchman v. Wolk

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-01

Citation: 152 So. 3d 628, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15266, 2014 WL 4852057

Snippet: amount of damages to the single amount of $85,826.76, 7 plus prejudgment interest, (b) on the cross-appeal

Coleman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-08

Citation: 53 So. 3d 1052, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18623, 2010 WL 4967473

Snippet: notice requirements outlined in subsections 768.76(7) and (9), Florida Statutes (2009) (the collateral

Gonzalez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-23

Citation: 38 So. 3d 226, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9137, 2010 WL 2507306

Snippet: DOB 08/03/81, and Francis Yamil Garcia DOB 02/07/76. 7. The Hillsborough County Property Appraiser's records

Jackson v. Ryan's Family Steak House

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-12-22

Citation: 27 So. 3d 90, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19986, 2009 WL 4912644

Snippet: (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (reversing JCC’s finding that 76.7 of the claimant’s attorney’s hours were “excessive

Sanchez v. Woerner Management, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-02-20

Citation: 867 So. 2d 1173, 2004 WL 314938

Snippet: 1st DCA 2001) (reversing the JCC's finding that 76.7 of the claimant's attorney's hours were "excessive

Winkler v. Moore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-25

Citation: 831 So. 2d 63, 2002 WL 717819

Snippet: 76 07/31/1991

Frasher v. Fox Distributing of S.W. Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-05

Citation: 813 So. 2d 1017, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 2002 WL 507167

Snippet: 76.11, together with sections 76.04, 76.05, and 76.07, set forth what actions of the defendant will support

Feinberg v. Miami-Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-07-09

Citation: 788 So. 2d 417, 2001 WL 760231

Snippet: award of $13,440.00 was derived. The findings that 76.7 of the claimant attorney's hours were excessive

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1996-02-29

Snippet: legislative intent). 6 Attorney General Opinion 82-76. 7 Chapter 73-129, Laws of Florida. 8 See, Brown v

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-01-29

Snippet: following: nonreimbursable expenses pursuant to s394.76(7), F.S.; federal grants, excluding Title IVA and

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-08-15

Snippet: nonreimbursable expenditures as provided in s.394.76(7), F. S., federal grants excluding funds earned under

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-09-21

Snippet: nonreimbursable expenditures as provided in s. 394.76(7), F. S., federal grants excluding funds earned under

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-09-13

Snippet: board, and notwithstanding the provisions of s. 373.076(7), the Governor and Cabinet sitting as the Land and

McLain v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-16

Citation: 343 So. 2d 939, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15267

Snippet: Satterlee of $108 as evidenced by arrest on 3/29/76: “(7) Requiring aforesaid to comply with all instructions

Fort ex rel. Fort v. O'Steen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-23

Citation: 340 So. 2d 1257

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Reversed on the authority of Holl v. Tal-cott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Visingardi v. Tirone, 193 So.2d 601 (Fla.1967) and Sorrells v. Mullins, 303 So.2d 385 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974).

Adams v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-16

Citation: 341 So. 2d 765

Snippet: 2 at 63. [6] Fla.Laws 1892, Ch. 2377-94 at 773-76. [7] Fla.Laws 1892, Ch. 2380 at 774. [8] Subsequent

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-10-08

Snippet: of district mental health board personnel, s. 394.76(7), F. S. (1976 Supp.), provides that expenditures

Morgan v. General Insurance Company of America

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-12-16

Citation: 181 So. 2d 175

Snippet: will bear 23.3 per cent and the insurance carrier 76.7 per cent. If there have been other expenses incurred