Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 76.22 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 76.22 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 76.22

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 76.22
76.22 Custody of attached property; sale of perishables.All personal property levied on by attachment, shall remain in custody of the officer who attached it until disposed of according to law unless it is restored to defendant or some person for him or her, or is claimed by a third person. When the property attached is perishable or liable to great deterioration in value or the costs of keeping it are greatly disproportionate to its value, the court may order the sale of the property after such notice as is expedient, and the proceeds of the sale shall be paid into court and abide the judgment.
History.s. 12, Feb. 17, 1833; RS 1655; GS 2119; RGS 3420; CGL 5273; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 380, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 76.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.22


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.22
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.22.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

R. BELTZ, S. v. ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 279 F. Supp. 3d 569 (W.D. Pa. 2017)

. . . As a result, 50% of Class A shares and. 76.22% of the Class B shares passed to F.W. . . .

CALIFORNIA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, s v. JOLLY,, 630 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . providers which, they argue, indicate that ADHC provider costs currently exceed the reimbursement rate of $76.22 . . .

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 545 F.3d 1023 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . by minorities or women (“M/WBEs”), 23.48 percent were identified via “Prime Contractor Utilization,” 76.22 . . .

RUCKER, v. SHEEHY ALEXANDRIA, INC. d b a, 228 F. Supp. 2d 711 (E.D. Va. 2002)

. . . Rucker claims actual damages of $76.22, the amount of extra interest charged during the first payment . . .

In BERNSTEIN, LLC, a LLC, v., 230 B.R. 144 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1999)

. . . Using BR’s 340-day feed expense of $25,915.74, and dividing it by 340 days, results in a feed cost of $76.22 . . . Total feed and direct expenses for the 1995 hen period were $25,915.74, or as we have seen, $76.22 per . . . This leaves a valid lienable period of 122 days which at $76.22 per day calculates to $9,300.00. . . . Calculated at $76.22 per day, this would result in a feed and direct expense of $1,448.18. . . .

J. McMILLAN, v. INTER- ROYAL CORPORATION,, 532 F. Supp. 111 (D.D.C. 1982)

. . . E.g., 2A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.22 at 14-314 through 14-319 (1976) (“Larson”); Cohen . . .

C. THOMAS, Jr. v. LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, a v. UNITED STATES, 665 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Cir. 1981)

. . . Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.22 at 14-314 through 14-319 (1976), and with less than overwhelming . . .

MARANT v. FARRELL LINES, INC., 550 F.2d 142 (3d Cir. 1977)

. . . Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, § 76.22 at pp. 14-318 to 14-319 (Release No. 17, 1974) (hereinafter . . .

BRKARIC, STAR IRON STEEL COMPANY STAR IRON STEEL COMPANY, v. HANNA FLUID POWER DIVISION CUTLER HAMMER, INC. v. NORTHEAST MARINE TERMINAL CO. INC., 409 F. Supp. 516 (E.D.N.Y. 1976)

. . . .) § 76.22, pp. 318-19. . . .

COX, v. MADDUX, 285 F. Supp. 876 (E.D. Ark. 1968)

. . . and two copies of the trial transcript 242.50 Statutory witness fees 16.00 Expenses of photographs 76.22 . . . appears that 25 glossy prints of the accident scene and the vehicles were procured at an expense of $76.22 . . .

THE IONA. SPEEDING v. HARD, 80 F. 933 (5th Cir. 1897)

. . . On February 17, 189-1, an amended libel was filed, claiming a further amount of $76.22, amount of certain . . .