Syfert Injury Law Firm

APD Holdings, Inc. v. Reidel

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-02-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 865 So. 2d 682

Snippet: the statutory considerations outlined in section 76.24, Florida Statutes (2002), "Dissolution of Attachment

Frasher v. Fox Distributing of S.W. Florida, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-04-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 813 So. 2d 1017, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 2002 WL 507167

Snippet: motion for immediate dissolution pursuant to section 76.24(1). The trial court promptly scheduled a hearing…motion to dissolve the writ, claiming that section 76.24(4) gave it the right to a jury trial. Frasher argued…Frasher of his right to an immediate hearing. Section 76.24(1) states: The defendant by motion may obtain the

Marshall-Shaw v. Ford

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-03-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 755 So. 2d 162

Snippet: obtaining a final judgment in his or her favor. §§ 76.24(1), 77.07(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). Appellant first

City of Hollywood v. Lombardi

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-08-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 738 So. 2d 491

Snippet: through December 14, 1994 which amounted to $41,228.76. 24. Section 440.39, Fla. Stat. (1993), states that

Debis Financial Services, Inc. v. Castaneda

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-02-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 725 So. 2d 1280, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1894

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. §§ 76.24(1), 77.07 (1), Florida Statutes (1997); see Ayares-Eisenberg Perrine

Epica v. Swiss Bank Corp.(overseas) Sa

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-06-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 507 So. 2d 1119

Snippet: underlying action will be rendered in his favor." § 76.24, Fla. Stat. (1985). On appeal EPICA does not challenge

Estudios, Proyectos e Inversiones de Centro America, S.A. v. Swiss Bank Corporation (Overseas) S.A.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-02-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 507 So. 2d 1119, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 617, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6890

Snippet: underlying action will be rendered in his favor.” § 76.24, Fla.Stat. (1985). On appeal EPI-CA does not challenge

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1983-12-06T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: delineated in s 2(1) of Ch. 83-115. Compare, AGO 76-24 (concluding that parole and probation officers are

DEPT. OF LEGAL AFF. v. Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1983-04-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 434 So. 2d 879

Snippet: reverse. In 1976 the legislature enacted chapter 76-24, Laws of Florida, (section 550.37(13), Florida Statutes

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1982-06-01T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: law enforcement or peace officers. See also, AGO 076-24, construing s112.19(1)(c), and concluding that

E. V. R. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1977-02-01T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 342 So. 2d 93, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15219

Snippet: adjudicatory hearing. Reversed and remanded. No. 76-24 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

EVR v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1977-01-31T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 342 So. 2d 93

Snippet: Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 76-24. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District…adjudicatory hearing. Reversed and remanded. 76-24 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Unique Caterers, Inc. v. Rudy's Farm Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-09-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 338 So. 2d 1067

Snippet: specifically the grounds. [8] See Note 3. [9] 76.24 Dissolution of attachment. — (1) The court to which… hear motions to dissolve the attachment. [10] 76.24 Dissolution of attachment. — * * * * * * (2) On

Olds v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-10-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 302 So. 2d 787

Snippet: (Fla. 1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 849, 90 S.Ct. 76, 24 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969). Reflecting from the appellate

Little Beaver Theatre, Inc. v. State ex rel. Gerstein

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-02-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 259 So. 2d 217, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7089

Snippet: .2d 11, cert. den. 1969, 396 U.S. 849, 90 S.Ct. 76, 24 L.Ed.2d 98; Conde v. Full House, Inc., Fla.App.1968

Martin v. Martin

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-02-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 196 So. 2d 26, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4989

Snippet: dissolution of garnishments, is identical with F.S. Sec. 76.24, F.S.A. dealing with the same identical subject

Southern National Bank of Fort Walton Beach v. Young

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-07-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 142 So. 2d 788, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3003

Snippet: WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur. . F.S. Section 76.24, F.S.A. . Pan American Metal Products Co. v. Healy

Norman Babel Mortgage Co. v. Golden Heights Land Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-01-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 117 So. 2d 205

Snippet: application for dissolution, as authorized under § 76.24, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. In the trial of the case, which

Luciano v. Service Machinery Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-05-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 112 So. 2d 890, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2971

Snippet: been set in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 76.24, Florida Statutes 1957, and F.S.A., counsel for

Van Derven v. Van Derven

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-10-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 105 So. 2d 805

Snippet: must be consummated. Meister v. Moore, 96 U.S. 76, 24 L.Ed. 826. ‡ % % Hi ‡ “In the case at bar the appellant