Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 76.24 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 76.24 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 76.24

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 76.24
76.24 Dissolution of attachment.
(1) The defendant by motion may obtain the dissolution of a writ of attachment unless the plaintiff proves the grounds upon which the writ was issued and a reasonable probability that the final judgment in the underlying action will be rendered in the plaintiff’s favor. The court shall set down such motion for an immediate hearing. This motion shall be in lieu of the provisions of s. 76.18.
(2) On answer by defendant that any allegation in plaintiff’s motion is untrue, this issue shall be tried. If the allegation in plaintiff’s motion which is denied is not proved to be true, the attachment shall be dissolved.
(3) If the answer denies the debt demanded, the judge may require pleadings thereon on motion of either party to be filed in such time as he or she fixes.
(4) The issue, if any, raised by the pleadings shall be tried at the same time as the issue, if any, made by the answer on the special cause assigned in plaintiff’s motion for the suit. On demand of either party a jury summoned from the body of the county shall be impaneled to try the issue.
History.s. 5, Feb. 15, 1834; RS 1656; GS 2120; RGS 3421; CGL 5274; s. 15, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 4, ch. 78-38; s. 381, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 76.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.24


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.24
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.24.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 76.24

Total Results: 20

APD Holdings, Inc. v. Reidel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-02-18

Citation: 865 So. 2d 682, 2004 WL 332768

Snippet: the statutory considerations outlined in section 76.24, Florida Statutes (2002), "Dissolution of Attachment

Frasher v. Fox Distributing of S.W. Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-05

Citation: 813 So. 2d 1017, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 2002 WL 507167

Snippet: motion for immediate dissolution pursuant to section 76.24(1). The trial court promptly scheduled a hearing

Marshall-Shaw v. Ford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-03-15

Citation: 755 So. 2d 162, 2000 WL 276502

Snippet: obtaining a final judgment in his or her favor. §§ 76.24(1), 77.07(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). Appellant first

City of Hollywood v. Lombardi

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-08-05

Citation: 738 So. 2d 491, 1999 WL 569559

Snippet: through December 14, 1994 which amounted to $41,228.76. 24. Section 440.39, Fla. Stat. (1993), states that

Debis Financial Services, Inc. v. Castaneda

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-02-24

Citation: 725 So. 2d 1280, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1894

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. §§ 76.24(1), 77.07 (1), Florida Statutes (1997); see Ayares-Eisenberg Perrine

Epica v. Swiss Bank Corp.(overseas) Sa

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-06-23

Citation: 507 So. 2d 1119, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 617, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8972

Snippet: underlying action will be rendered in his favor." § 76.24, Fla. Stat. (1985). On appeal EPICA does not challenge

Estudios, Proyectos e Inversiones de Centro America, S.A. v. Swiss Bank Corporation (Overseas) S.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-02-24

Citation: 507 So. 2d 1119, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 617, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6890

Snippet: underlying action will be rendered in his favor.” § 76.24, Fla.Stat. (1985). On appeal EPI-CA does not challenge

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-12-07

Snippet: delineated in s 2(1) of Ch. 83-115. Compare, AGO 76-24 (concluding that parole and probation officers are

DEPT. OF LEGAL AFF. v. Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-04-14

Citation: 434 So. 2d 879

Snippet: reverse. In 1976 the legislature enacted chapter 76-24, Laws of Florida, (section 550.37(13), Florida Statutes

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-06-01

Snippet: law enforcement or peace officers. See also, AGO 076-24, construing s112.19(1)(c), and concluding that

E. V. R. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-02-01

Citation: 342 So. 2d 93, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15219

Snippet: HAVERFIELD, Judge. This is an appeal from an adjudication of delinquency. A petition for delinquency for larceny of an automobile was filed against juvenile E.V.R. and a plea of denial was entered on his behalf by court appointed counsel. An adjudicatory hearing was held on October 10, 1975 and after presentation of all the evidence, appellant renewed his motion for judgment of acquittal. The motion was denied and appellant requested to make a closing argument. The judge denied appellant’s request

EVR v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-02-01

Citation: 342 So. 2d 93

Snippet: Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 76-24. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Unique Caterers, Inc. v. Rudy's Farm Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-09-23

Citation: 338 So. 2d 1067, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4561

Snippet: specifically the grounds. [8] See Note 3. [9] 76.24 Dissolution of attachment. — (1) The court to which

Olds v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-10-25

Citation: 302 So. 2d 787

Snippet: (Fla. 1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 849, 90 S.Ct. 76, 24 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969). Reflecting from the appellate

Little Beaver Theatre, Inc. v. State ex rel. Gerstein

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-02-29

Citation: 259 So. 2d 217, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7089

Snippet: 2d 11, cert. den. 1969, 396 U.S. 849, 90 S.Ct. 76, 24 L.Ed.2d 98; Conde v. Full House, Inc., Fla.App

Martin v. Martin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-02-24

Citation: 196 So. 2d 26, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4989

Snippet: dissolution of garnishments, is identical with F.S. Sec. 76.24, F.S.A. dealing with the same identical subject

Southern National Bank of Fort Walton Beach v. Young

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-07-03

Citation: 142 So. 2d 788, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3003

Snippet: WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur. . F.S. Section 76.24, F.S.A. . Pan American Metal Products Co. v. Healy

Norman Babel Mortgage Co. v. Golden Heights Land Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-01-25

Citation: 117 So. 2d 205

Snippet: application for dissolution, as authorized under § 76.24, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. In the trial of the case, which

Luciano v. Service Machinery Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-05-27

Citation: 112 So. 2d 890, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2971

Snippet: been set in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 76.24, Florida Statutes 1957, and F.S.A., counsel for

Van Derven v. Van Derven

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-10-21

Citation: 105 So. 2d 805

Snippet: must be consummated. Meister v. Moore, 96 U.S. 76, 24 L.Ed. 826. ‡ % % Hi ‡ “In the case at bar the appellant