Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-27
Snippet: Davis, 339 So. 3d 318, 321 (Fla. 2022). Section 559.77(2) permits a prevailing plaintiff to recover “actual
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06
Snippet: costs, for a total of $104,295.77. 2 Wife’s need for interim fees
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-07-21
Snippet: 426, 428 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“Section 218.077(2) of the Florida Statutes is a preemption statute
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-28
Snippet: 00 in statutory damages pursuant to section 559.77(2), Florida Statutes (2019); injunctive relief to
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-23
Snippet: 000 and other monetary damages under section 559.77(2), Florida Statutes. Duggan moved to dismiss the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-13
Citation: 272 So. 3d 426
Snippet: lease agreement or otherwise. 4Section 218.077(2) of the Florida Statutes is a preemption statute
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-13
Snippet: We agree with the trial court that section 218.077(2) of the Florida Statutes is a preemption statute
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-08-24
Citation: 198 So. 3d 1133, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12810, 2016 WL 4493351
Snippet: Banner was awarded fees pursuant to section 559.77(2); defendants were awarded fees under section 501
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-06-16
Snippet: 3. This instruction conflicts with F.S. 768.77(2)(a)2. and should not be given in medical malpractice
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-21
Citation: 192 So. 3d 1183
Snippet: 1983). 3. This instruction conflicts' with F.S. 768.77(2)(a)2. and should not be given in medical malpractice
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-21
Citation: 192 So. 3d 1183, 2016 WL 1592719
Snippet: 3. This instruction conflicts with F.S. 768.77(2)(a)2. and should not be given in medical malpractice
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-02-18
Snippet: negligent). Id. at 1276-77. 2 “In [Engle I], the jury
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-09-19
Citation: 98 So. 3d 1210, 2012 WL 4094147, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15557
Snippet: express statutory remedy provided by section 559.77(2), and, therefore, the arbitration clause is void
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-04-25
Citation: 87 So. 3d 72, 2012 WL 1414936, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6480
Snippet: Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). See § 559.77(2), (5); 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (2000). Accordingly, we
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-10-31
Citation: 73 So. 3d 336, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17227
Snippet: acknowledge Appellants' argument that under section 559.77(2), Florida Statutes, the issue of attorney's fees
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-08-15
Citation: 71 So. 3d 899, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12789, 2011 WL 3558160
Snippet: extended reporting period. See also 54 Fed.Reg. 47,077-02 (Nov. 9, 1989) (codified at 40 C.F.R. § 280.97(b)(1
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-04
Citation: 35 So. 3d 666, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 302
Snippet: noneconomic losses, and punitive damages. F.S. 768.77(2), however, requires further itemization for medical
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-08
Citation: 993 So. 2d 91, 2008 WL 4482581
Snippet: paying the mortgage and property expenses. See § 61.077(2) (requiring court to consider whether alimony is
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-08-11
Citation: 937 So. 2d 1136, 2006 WL 2347789
Snippet: provides that punitive damages may be awarded. § 559.77(2). Thus, in this case neither the language of the
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-05-06
Citation: 877 So. 2d 697, 2004 WL 1057629
Snippet: and imposed death for the murder. See id. at 676-77.[2] On direct appeal, this Court affirmed Howell's