77.082
No reply filed.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
77.082 No reply filed.—If no reply to garnishee’s answer is served, garnishee may surrender any goods, chattels, or effects of defendant in garnishee’s hands or possession to the sheriff and may pay any money or debt into registry of court. In such event or if garnishee prevails in the trial of any reply and after proper disposition of any property disclosed by garnishee’s answer, the court shall discharge him or her from further liability under the writ.
History.—s. 27, ch. 67-254; s. 391, ch. 95-147.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: First Colony v. Sun State Capital Funding
First Colony v. Sun State Capital Funding (1999)
“The record in this case presents numerous questions and few answers.”
Continental National Bank v. Tavormina (In re Masvidal) (1993)
“Fla.Stat. §§ 77.082 and 77.14. Secondly, after the service of the writ and answer by the garnishee, and asstuning there has been no satisfactory surrender, judgment may be rendered against the garnishee for the amount disclosed by the answer or after trial.”
Lewars v. State (2017)
“082(9)(d)(1) is consistent with our construction of the plain language of section 77.082(9)(a)(1). Section 775.082(9)(d)(1) provides: It is the intent of the Legislature that offenders previously released from prison who meet the criteria in paragraph (a) be punished to the…”
Derrick Grantley v. Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (2025)
“1 Two years later, the Florida Supreme Court held that juvenile non-homicide offenders whose sentences violated Graham needed to be resentenced under state juvenile sentencing legislation (now codified in Florida Statutes §§ 77.”
— 77.082(3)(c) — 1 case
Derrick Grantley v. Ricky Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (2025)
“1 Two years later, the Florida Supreme Court held that juvenile non-homicide offenders whose sentences violated Graham needed to be resentenced under state juvenile sentencing legislation (now codified in Florida Statutes §§ 77.”
— 77.082(9)(a)(1) — 1 case
Lewars v. State (2017)
“082(9)(d)(1) is consistent with our construction of the plain language of section 77.082(9)(a)(1). Section 775.082(9)(d)(1) provides: It is the intent of the Legislature that offenders previously released from prison who meet the criteria in paragraph (a) be punished to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.