Florida Statute 77.22 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 77
GARNISHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 77.22

77.22 Before judgment; effect of judgment for defendant.—

(1) If the judgment is for defendant in the main action, plaintiff shall pay all costs which have accrued in consequence of suing out a writ of garnishment before judgment and the money or property brought into the registry of the court or custody of the officer thereby inures to the benefit of and shall be controlled by defendant as completely as though it had been rendered in defendant’s favor.

(2) If plaintiff dismisses his or her action or has a judgment against him or her on the trial, the judgment against garnishee shall become a nullity and garnishee shall have execution for garnishee’s costs against plaintiff.

History.—s. 11, ch. 43, 1845; s. 2, ch. 1100, 1861; RS 1683, 1684; GS 2148, 2149; RGS 3450, 3451; CGL 5303, 5304; s. 27, ch. 67-254; s. 398, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former ss. 77.22, 77.23.

F.S. 77.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 77.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 77.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 77.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 77.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 77.22

Total Results: 11

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1999-06-08

Snippet: to the lowest bidder), and Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 77-22 (1977), 74-07 (1974) and 71-366 (1971). 5 See, Op

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-09-24

Citation: 606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Snippet: 34.2801 (1939) (enacted in 1935); Utah Code Ann. 77-22-17 (1953) (enacted in 1935); Vt. Stat. Ann. 13-6561

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1988-08-02

Snippet: agency for purposes of Part I, Ch. 287, F.S.); 77-22 (special district not a state agency for purposes

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1984-03-22

Snippet: relating to purchase of commodities); AGO's 77-140, 77-22, 75-56; and see, s 129.202(2) (relating to the budget

A.J. Spagnol Lumber Co. v. Trauger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-12-01

Citation: 423 So. 2d 956, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22189

Snippet: Maxwell v. Stewart [88 U.S.], 21 Wall. 71, 22 Wall. 77, 22 L.Ed. 564; Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U.S. 1, 6 S

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-03-03

Snippet: 117 So.2d 550 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1960), and AGO's 077-22, 074-7, and 071-366. In addition, Ch. 332, the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-02-07

Snippet: purchases by state agencies. Attorney General Opinion 077-22. Section 287.012 makes this abundantly clear by

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-12-30

Snippet: included within the foregoing definition (see AGO's 077-22 and 074-7 holding that special districts and other

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-03-01

Citation: 196 So. 2d 124, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3956

Snippet: 34.2801 (1939) (enacted in 1935); Utah Code Ann. 77-22-17 (1953) (enacted in 1935); Vt. Stat. Ann. 13-6561

Nash v. Walker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1955-02-09

Citation: 78 So. 2d 685

Snippet: is demanded. Sec. 77.08. We then turn to Secs. 77.22 and 77.26 and find that if the defendant prevails

State ex rel. Buford v. City of Tampa

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1924-09-09

Citation: 88 Fla. 196

Snippet: 110; Illinois v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 184 U. S. 77, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 300. See also Ward v. Mulford, 32