The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 77
GARNISHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 77.22

77.22 Before judgment; effect of judgment for defendant.—

(1) If the judgment is for defendant in the main action, plaintiff shall pay all costs which have accrued in consequence of suing out a writ of garnishment before judgment and the money or property brought into the registry of the court or custody of the officer thereby inures to the benefit of and shall be controlled by defendant as completely as though it had been rendered in defendant’s favor.

(2) If plaintiff dismisses his or her action or has a judgment against him or her on the trial, the judgment against garnishee shall become a nullity and garnishee shall have execution for garnishee’s costs against plaintiff.

History.—s. 11, ch. 43, 1845; s. 2, ch. 1100, 1861; RS 1683, 1684; GS 2148, 2149; RGS 3450, 3451; CGL 5303, 5304; s. 27, ch. 67-254; s. 398, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former ss. 77.22, 77.23.

F.S. 77.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 77.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 77.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 77.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 77.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DeKALB COUNTY, v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY,, 741 F.3d 795 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 77.22(1), 77.24. . . . Stat. § 77.22(1). . . .

COUNTY OF GENESEE v. GREENSTONE FARM CREDIT SERVICES, ACA, FLCA,, 968 F. Supp. 2d 860 (E.D. Mich. 2013)

. . . . § 77.22 (same); Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.523 (imposing a county transfer tax). . . . Stat. § 77.22; Mich. Comp. Laws § 207.523(2). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. LANCASTER,, 496 F. App'x 877 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . a hand-to-hand drug transaction between Lancaster and another person, officers found Lancaster with 77.22 . . . underlying Count 11 Lancaster next challenges his conviction on Count 11, which charged him ■with possessing 77.22 . . .

BOWLIN, v. MONTANEZ,, 446 F.3d 817 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . That December her countable income was determined to be $569.22, or $77.22 over the medically needy income . . .

BOWLIN, v. MONTANEZ,, 411 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (D. Neb. 2005)

. . . recertification process the following December and her countable income was determined to be $569.22, $77.22 . . .

In BROWN a k a a k a a k a BROWN, v. COURTESY CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO., 134 B.R. 134 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1991)

. . . Purchases of credit life and disability insurance, at $77.22 and $135.25, respectively, and a $45 cost . . .

GILBERT, O v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS E. E., 799 F.2d 1210 (8th Cir. 1986)

. . . (black) 67.72 8 13.86 81.58 15 Haggard, R. 65.72 17 11.50 77.22 30 Harvester, J. 64.93 25 12.95 77.88 . . .

W. v., 74 T.C. 578 (T.C. 1980)

. . . . $755.00 Trailer rental. 145.00 Food — $85 per month. 1,020.00 Telephone. 77.22 Insurance on trailer . . .

E. v., 56 T.C. 517 (T.C. 1971)

. . . Respondent has determined a deficiency in petitioners’ joint Federal income tax for 1967 in the amount of $77.22 . . .

PIKESVILLE HOME BUILDERS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 160 Ct. Cl. 541 (Ct. Cl. 1963)

. . . Parcel 8 which contains'77.22 acres was basically level with Martin Boulevard. . . . County, Maryland, including two sections (hereinafter referred to as parcel 2 and parcel 8) of 24 and 77.22 . . . Parcel 8, consisting of 77.22 acres, was at all pertinent times unimproved, heavily wooded, and basically . . .

L. H. NASH, v. I. D. WALKER, 78 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1955)

. . . We then turn to Secs. 77.22 and 77.26 and find that if the defendant-prevails, the plaintiff must pay . . .

BODENHOFER v. SMITH PLUMBING CO., 1 Fla. Supp. 170 (Fla. Industrial Comm'n 1949)

. . . for the cost of medical supplies purchased by him for the relief of his dermatitis, in the amount of $77.22 . . .

SPRUCE v. WHITE, 45 F. Supp. 842 (S.D.W. Va. 1942)

. . . It follows that the defendant has paid to the plaintiffs $77.22 in excess of the value of all timber . . . defendant, and that the defendant is entitled to judgment against the plaintiffs in the amount of $77.22 . . . Judgment will be entered for the defend' ant in the amount of $77.22 and costs. . . .

NATIONAL METAL MOULDING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 76 Ct. Cl. 194 (Ct. Cl. 1932)

. . . market value of $22.35 per net ton, and that the 1,560 pounds of unused steel possessed a cost value of $77.22 . . .