The 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B)
|
||||||
|
An application for review must be filed within thirty days of the grantee's receipt of the final audit determination. 20 U.S.C.A. § 1234a(b); 34 C.F.R. § 78.13(c). The grantee's application must identify the issues and facts in dispute and state the appellant's position. 34 C.F.R. § 78.13(b). In this case, the president of the College wrote the letter requesting the appeal as to some issues and explicitly conceding others. Even if we cannot assume that a college president should be able to determine what the College desires to appeal, we can expect that such a person should have known to consult counsel for advice on how to proceed.The form is amended in accordance with the statutory changes as a result of Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 92 S.Ct. 1983, 32 L.Ed.2d 556 (1972). The sheriff is commanded to dispose of the property according to law because of the conflict between sections 78.068(4) and 78.13, Florida Statutes (1979). The former apparently contemplates that the sheriff will hold the property for five days within which the bond can be posted while the latter still retains the old three day time period.Fla. Stat. Ann. § 78.13 (Supp. 1972-1973):Prior to the filing of the replevin action by Allstate, the Sheriff of Brevard County had taken possession of the same Pontiac automobile because he had received information that it was a stolen automobile. On March 20, 1967, Mrs. Moresca brought a replevin action in the Court of Record for Brevard County against the Sheriff to regain possession of the automobile. The Sheriff served the writ of replevin on himself, did not post a forthcoming bond, and after three days delivered the automobile to Mrs. Moresca as provided by Florida law (Section 78.13, F.S. 1965, F.S.A.). The Sheriff filed an answer in that action in which he asserted that the true owner of the automobile was either Harold J. Paul, or Mr. Paul's insurance carrier, Allstate.Sec. 78.13, Fla. Stat., F.S.A.. . . the appropriate line checked, and given to the purchaser before the purchaser signs it. 15 NYCRR § 78.13 . . . prior use of the motor vehicle before accepting payment of a deposit from a purchaser.” 15 NYCRR § 78.13 . . . the prior use of the motor vehicle before accepting payment of a deposit from the purchaser. 15 NYCRR 78.13 . . . prior use of the motor vehicle before accepting payment of a deposit from the purchaser.” 15 NYCRR 78.13 . . .
. . . semiautomatic pistol with an obliterated serial number and $2,590.00 in cash in Tucker’s bedroom and 78.13 . . .
. . . to dispose of the property according to law because of the conflict between sections 78.068(4) and 78.13 . . .
. . . to dispose of the property according to law because of the conflict between sections 78.068(4) and 78.13 . . .
. . . raises a presumption of irreparable harm for preliminary injunction purposes. 3 Nimmer § 14.06[A], at 14-78.13 . . .
. . . raises a presumption of irreparable harm for preliminary injunction purposes. 3 Nimmer § 14.06[A], at 14-78.13 . . .
. . . to dispose of the property according to law because of the conflict between sections 78.068(4) and 78.13 . . .
. . . In its initial supplement to the application B & T: (1) reduced its computer research charges by $78.13 . . .
. . . White candidates had therefore a pass rate of 89.57 percent and black candidates 78.13 percent. . . .
. . . The United States Supreme Court referred to §§ 78.01-78.13, Fla.Stat.Ann. (Supp. 1972-1973). . . . See §§ 78.01-78.13, Fla.Stat. (1971). . . . .
. . . Thus, the percentage of Whites passing was 89.57% and the percentage of Blacks passing was 78.13%. . . . The percentage of Whites passing was 89.57% and the percentage of Blacks passing was 78.13%. . . .
. . . . § 78.13(c). . . . . § 78.13(b). . . .
. . . . § 78.13 (1987). While the petition was pending, the parties settled most of their differences. . . .
. . . to dispose of the property according to law because of the conflict between sections 78.068(4) and 78.13 . . .
. . . This instruction was numbered § 78.13 in the Second Edition, Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice . . .
. . . See Florida Statutes, Sections 78.01, 78.07, 78.08, 78.10 and 78.13, F.S.A. . . .
. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice & Instructions § 78.13 at 205-206 (1970) was prejudicial error. . . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice & Instructions § 78.13 at 205-206 (1970), the modification limiting reduction . . .
. . . . §78.13 (Supp. 1972-1973). . . . Ann. § 78.13 (Supp. 1972-1973): “Writ; disposition of property levied on. — The officer executing the . . .
. . . In the Notes following section 78.13 it is said that the former instruction was altered “on the ground . . .
. . . Moresca as provided by Florida law (Section 78.13, F.S.196S, F.S.A.). . . .
. . . See. 78.13, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . Sec. G97.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . E. g. . . .
. . . January 3 and 20,1958, when two lots of $250,000 and $500,000 were transferred, namely, $78.12 and $78.13 . . .
. . . Treasury 2*4 bonds), at 95.13 (or $477,031.25) plus accrued interest of $583.79 and commission of $78.13 . . . $250,000 face amount) at 96.17 (or $241,328.13) plus accrued interest of $1,407.97, less commission of $78.13 . . .
. . . Des Moines Blue Print Co................ 78.13 (pd by ptf.) . . .
. . . of dividends so declared upon the several deposits, levied upon by said writ of attachment, is $11,2*78.13 . . .