Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 78.18 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 78.18 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 78.18

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 78
REPLEVIN
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 78.18
78.18 Judgment for plaintiff when goods not delivered to defendant.If it appears that the property described in the complaint was wrongfully taken or detained by defendant and the property has been delivered to plaintiff by the officer executing the writ, plaintiff shall have judgment for his or her damages caused by the taking and detention and costs.
History.s. 11, Mar. 11, 1845; RS 1724; GS 2188; RGS 3493; CGL 5346; s. 28, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 73-20; s. 409, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 78.18 on Google Scholar

F.S. 78.18 on Casetext

Amendments to 78.18


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 78.18
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 78.18.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 78.18

Total Results: 20

In Re Implementation of Committee on Privacy & Court Records Recommendations—Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-11-03

Citation: 78 So. 3d 1045, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 3030, 2011 WL 5829543

Snippet: and prevailed on the merits. Pursuant to section 78.18, Florida Statutes (1995), paragraph 2 of the form

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2009-10-13

Snippet: and implemented by Orange County Ordinance No. 78-18. The board was established upon approval by a freeholder

Brown v. Reynolds

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-14

Citation: 872 So. 2d 290, 2004 WL 784502

Snippet: a result of the wrongful taking or detention. § 78.18; see Fla. R. Civ. P. Form 1.995(a); HEG, Inc. v

E & M Marine Corp. v. First Union National Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-04-04

Citation: 783 So. 2d 311, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4650, 2001 WL 321605

Snippet: agreement with E & M Marine. Additionally, section 78.18, Florida Statutes (1995),1 does not apply because

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-10-05

Citation: 773 So. 2d 1098, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2312, 2000 WL 1472356

Snippet: and prevailed on the merits. Pursuant to section 78.18, Florida Statutes (1995), paragraph 2 of the form

Traces Fashion Group, Inc. v. C & C MANAGEMENT, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-19

Citation: 763 So. 2d 502, 2000 WL 986401

Snippet: error. Contrary to plaintiff's reasoning, Section 78.18, Florida Statutes (1997) does not support entry

In re Amendment to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure—Final Judgment of Replevin Forms 1.995(a)-(d)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-15

Citation: 723 So. 2d 180, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 547, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 1907, 1998 WL 716736

Snippet: and prevailed on the merits. Pursuant to section 78.18, Florida Statutes (1995), paragraph 2 of the form

HEG, Inc. v. Bay Bank & Trust Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-12-20

Citation: 591 So. 2d 1011, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12717, 1991 WL 272763

Snippet: for wrongful detention. As provided in Section 78.18, Florida Statutes (1987), “If it appears that the

FLA. EXPORT TOBACCO v. Dept. of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-06-26

Citation: 510 So. 2d 936

Snippet: arising subsequent to the assessment." 358 So.2d at 78.[18] We also attach no controlling significance to

Sag Harbour Marine, Inc. v. Fickett

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-03-20

Citation: 484 So. 2d 1250

Snippet: and entitled to recover its costs under section 78.18, Florida Statutes (1981), because appellees abandoned

FORESIGHT ENTER. v. Leisure Time Prop.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-21

Citation: 466 So. 2d 283

Snippet: taking or detention" mentioned in sections 78.01 and 78.18, Florida Statutes. The measure of those damages

Weigh Less for Life, Inc. v. Barnett Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-05-28

Citation: 399 So. 2d 88

Snippet: to him, if "he prevails... ." Finally, Section 78.18 provides for recovery by the plaintiff of his damages

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1980-05-30

Snippet: in a previously issued Attorney General Opinion (078-18), the purpose of permitting the examination to

Trading Post of Naples, Inc. v. Howl

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-05-23

Citation: 371 So. 2d 221, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14745

Snippet: return of Wood’s personal property and under Section 78.18, Florida Statutes, was entitled to costs caused

International Harvest. Cr. v. American Nat. Bk.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-02-13

Citation: 296 So. 2d 32

Snippet: redelivered to defendant. F.S. § 78.165 (1973) (old § 78.18), F.S.A., does not contain the "special interest"

American Employers' Insurance Co. v. Piedmont Sewing Supply, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-12-11

Citation: 287 So. 2d 111, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6131

Snippet: It is so ordered. . We noted that Fla.Stat. § 78.18 was cited in the judgment, but obviously this was

Goodbody & Co. v. Dodson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-11-17

Citation: 240 So. 2d 882, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5695

Snippet: damages caused by the taking and detention as in § 78.18 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Nevertheless we hold that even

Butler v. Mirabelli

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-10-21

Citation: 179 So. 2d 868

Snippet: with a separate set of circumstances. Fla.Stats. 78.18 (plaintiff) and 78.20 (defendant) F.S.A., set out

First National Bank of Miami v. First Bonded Warehouse

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-04-20

Citation: 174 So. 2d 606, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4110

Snippet: defendant.- — If it shall appear, as set forth in § 78.18, that the goods have been redelivered to the defendant

Huckleberry v. Davis Double Seal Jalousies, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-02-01

Citation: 117 So. 2d 519

Snippet: the appellee was so entitled and pursuant to § 78.18, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., entered judgment accordingly