The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . hours expended on the case, McClure’s counsel’s time records indicate that counsel spent a total of 78.20 . . .
. . . In a letter dated July 26, 2011, NRC assessed a duplication fee of $78.20, and informed plaintiff that . . . Plaintiff enclosed a money order for $78.20. Id. . . . addition to NRC’s withhold-ings, which are not addressed at this time, plaintiff requested a refund of $78.20 . . .
. . . reserved jurisdiction to determine Wilkerson’s damages as well as attorney’s fees and costs under section 78.20 . . . section and s. 78.21 shall not preclude any other remedies available under the laws of this state. § 78.20 . . .
. . . The Debtor did not include on Schedule J expenses of $104.90 for medical insurance premiums or $78.20 . . .
. . . Section 78.20, Florida Statutes (1995), provides for an award of attorneys’ fees. . . .
. . . .” §§ 78.20-21, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
. . . the ALJ determined the monthly premium set by Defendant under paragraph (a)(3) was $58.70, $66.60, $78.20 . . . Again, this year, your benefit went up to $197.80 and the premium went up to $78.20. . . . However, you still owe a 40% penalty on the $78.20 or $31.30 so we have to charge you $98.50 for your . . . The Appellant’s premiums ($66.60 for 2004, $78.20 for 2005, and $88.50 for 2006) were adjusted to not . . . When the Secretary raised the premium for 2005 (Tr. 170) to $78.20, forty percent ($31.28) would have . . .
. . . Prior to McMurrain, this court had construed section 78.20, Florida Statutes (2007), upon which this . . .
. . . The trial court also awarded GMAC damages under section 78.20, Florida Statutes (2003), for the depreciation . . . Relying on section 78.20, GMAC argued that it was entitled to damages for the depreciation of the Hummer . . . Section 78.20 The trial court relied exclusively on section 78.20 as the basis for the damages award. . . . Analysis After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that section 78.20 is inapplicable under . . . In short, there was no “taking” of the Hummer by Southern Auto within the meaning of section 78.20. . . .
. . . At Medicare’s 2005 monthly premium rate of $78.20, Cole/UAW retirees currently pay approximately $392.40 . . .
. . . At Medicare’s 2005 monthly premium rate of $78.20, Cole/ UAW retirees currently pay approximately $392.40 . . .
. . . Burrows’ motion for judgment pursuant to section 78.20 & -.21, Florida Statutes (1999). . . . Burrows, notwithstanding her failure to plead entitlement to fees pursuant to section 78.20, Florida . . . The amended motion for judgment and for attorney’s fees expressly cited section 78.20 and -.21, and the . . . trial court’s order stated that the fees award was based on section 78.20. . . . Section 78.20 states: 78.20 Judgment for defendant when goods retained by, or redelivered to, defendant_When . . .
. . . five-point increase under the VEOA based on his preference eligible status, resulting in a Final Rating of 78.20 . . .
. . . Section 78.20, Florida Statutes (1987), which authorizes the award of attorney’s fees, is inapplicable . . . Fickett, 484 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (holding that section 78.20 was inapplicable because the . . . The trial court referred to §§ 78.065-78.068, 78.20, and 78.21, Fla. Stat. . . . .
. . . Section 78.20, Florida Statutes (1995), provides for an award of attorneys^ fees. . . .
. . . Plaintiff demands attorney’s fees in the amount of $15,640.00, representing 78.20 hours (through February . . .
. . . Section 78.20, Florida Statutes (1995), provides for an award of attorney fees. . . .
. . . While Dollar adamantly argued to the contrary, the statutory authority upon which it'relied below, §§ 78.20 . . .
. . . trial court erred in finding that attorney’s fees and costs are immediately awardable under section 78.20 . . . order dissolving the writ, Whiland filed a motion for costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to section 78.20 . . . Based upon the plain language of section 78.20, we reverse. . . . International Mailing and Printing Co., Inc., 506 So.2d 1081, 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (section 78.20 . . . In agreeing with the Fourth District’s interpretation of section 78.20, we acknowledge conflict with . . .
. . . See §§ 78.19, 78.20, 78.21, Fla.Stat. See e.g., State ex rel. O’Hara v. . . .
. . . Nimmer § 13.03[E][3] at 13-78.20. . . .
. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 13.03[E][3], at 13-78.19 to -78.20 (1991) (hereinafter, . . . Nimmer § 13.-03[E][3], at 13-78.20. . . . See also Nimmer § 13.03[E][3], at 13-78.20 (“given Shaw’s reformulation of the extrinsic test, the decision . . .
. . . The hours (78.20 hours), the hourly fee rate ($104.40), and the costs ($210.50) are reasonable. . . .
. . . (b) in view of the bond requirement and the remedies provided by sections 78.068(4), 78.068(6) and 78.20 . . . a dissolution of such writ upon a failure of the petitioner to make a certain showing; amending s. 78.20 . . .
. . . Section 78.20 provides that upon the dissolution of a prejudgment writ, the defendant is to have judgment . . . same manner as provided in s. 78.19 for judgment in favor of plaintiff_ The remedies provided in s. 78.20 . . .
. . . in the final judgment in support of granting the appellee an attorney’s fee contemplated in section 78.20 . . .
. . . /81 19457.05 179 08/31/81 Nelson Pork Fact. 8234.92 08/31/81 8234.92 180 08/31/81 Nelson Pork Fact. 78.20 . . . 08/31/81 78.20 181 09/03/81 J. . . .
. . . International would be entitled to a reasonable attorneys fee on the replevin count pursuant to section 78.20 . . . point raised by Gimbel relates to International Mailing’s entitlement to an attorneys fee under section 78.20 . . . Maierhoffer, 382 So.2d 318, 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (interpreting § 78.20). . . . Section 78.20 does not create an independent cause of action for damages to a replevied chattel, and . . . Section 78.20 is merely a “make whole” provision for defendants who prevail in replevin actions and meet . . .
. . . The trial court, citing sections 78.20 and 78.21, Florida Statutes (1981), ordered Sag Harbour to pay . . . The court’s opinion and judgment predicated the award upon a citation to sections 78.20 and 78.21, Florida . . . The only statutory authority for awarding attorney’s fees is found in section 78.20, which applies when . . . was neither retained by nor redelivered to appellees within the meaning of the provisions of section 78.20 . . . Because the circuit court erred as a matter of law in relying on both section 78.20 and 78.21 as authority . . . erred in considering the trial court’s ruling on their entitlement to attorney’s fees under section 78.20 . . .
. . . This is evident from the provisions of Section 78.20, which provides that when property has been redelivered . . .
. . . that the defendant was entitled to recover attorney’s fees from the plaintiff under Florida Statute 78.20 . . .
. . . his cross-appeal, urges that the trial court erred in denying him an attorneys fee based upon Section 78.20 . . . The statute provides: “78.20 Judgment for defendant when goods retained by, or redelivered to, him. . . .
. . . 104.20 2/28/74 2.083 99.00 3/15/74 2.083 93.80 3/31/74 2.083 88.60 4/15/74 2.083 83.40 4/30/74 2.083 78.20 . . .
. . . Those benefits, calculated on the basis of $69.60 per month for 20 months and $78.20 per month for six . . .
. . . defendants properly included the notary fee in the “finance charge”, the “amount financed” would have been $78.20 . . .
. . . -0269, in the amount of $7,-038, for the lease of a transit mixer truck, with operator and helper ($78.20 . . .
. . . C-0269, in the amount of $7,038, for the lease of a transit mixer truck, with operator and helper ($78.20 . . .
. . . Municipal Code of the City of Chicago, §§ 78.11, 78.20. . . .
. . . Fla.Stats. 78.18 (plaintiff) and 78.20 (defendant) F.S.A., set out what the judgment is to cover in cases . . .
. . . basis, but for a while prior to filing suit had been working only part time for a monthly salary of $78.20 . . .
. . . By virtue of § 78.19, F.S.A., which is ftiade applicable to the instant case under provisions of §§ 78.20 . . .
. . . Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law, Sec. 78.20, page 253, The fact that a claim is filed against Employer . . .
. . . Section 78.20, F.S. 1941, F.S.A., provides that when judgment is for the defendant and he has the goods . . .
. . . Hutchinson, March 4, 1923, $78.20. (16) The Atlantic Company, June 1,1923, $1,150.75. (17) A. W. . . .