Florida Statute 82.091 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 82
FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL DETAINER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 82.091

82.091 Judgment and execution.—

(1) If the court enters a judgment for the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall recover possession of the real property that he or she is entitled to and damages and costs. The court shall award a writ of possession to be executed without delay and execution for the plaintiff’s damages and costs.

(2) If the court enters a judgment for the defendant, the court shall order that the defendant recover costs.

History.—s. 15, ch. 1630, 1868; RS 1702; GS 2167; RGS 3471; CGL 5324; s. 33, ch. 67-254; s. 426, ch. 95-147; s. 8, ch. 2018-94.

Note.—Former s. 82.16.

F.S. 82.091 on Google Scholar

F.S. 82.091 on Casetext

Amendments to 82.091

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 82.091

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 82.091.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 82.091

Total Results: 12

STATE OF FLORIDA v. MITCHELL REDDIN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-15

Snippet: 140(c)(1)(E); see also United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 91 (1978) ("A judgment of acquittal, whether

Diaz v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-21

Citation: 132 So. 3d 93, 2013 WL 6170645

Snippet: before age eighteen.” Franqui v. State, 59 So.3d 82, 91 (Fla.2011); Cherry v. State, 959 So.2d 702, 711

James P. Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-10-17

Citation: 967 So. 2d 369, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16311, 2007 WL 3005579

Snippet: Corbett v. MacDonald Moving Servs., Inc., 124 F.3d 82, 91 (2d Cir.1997)). The parties disagree over whether

Del Rio v. City of Hialeah

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-05-11

Citation: 904 So. 2d 484, 2005 WL 1109439

Snippet: judgment hearing was whether Hialeah Ordinance 82-91[1], which Del Rio claims was violated by Abreu and

First Union Nat. Bank v. Turney

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-11-26

Citation: 824 So. 2d 172, 2001 WL 1485659

Snippet: Dusen v. Southeast First Nat'l Bank, 478 So.2d 82, 91-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (declaring "the general rule

Lascaibar v. Lascaibar

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-12-13

Citation: 773 So. 2d 1236, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16243, 2000 WL 1817056

Snippet: by a reversal.” United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 91, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978) (footnote

City of Fort Walton Beach v. Grant

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-04-14

Citation: 544 So. 2d 230, 1989 WL 36153

Snippet: the City Ordinance Code. Ray v. Chesser, Case No. 82-91, Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. The trial court

Thompson v. Crawford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-11-20

Citation: 479 So. 2d 169, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2597

Snippet: found guilty." United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 91, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 2194, 57 L.Ed.2d 65, 74 (quoting

Florida Peach Corp. of America, International Division, S.A. v. Lurie

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-03-24

Citation: 411 So. 2d 339, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19561

Snippet: COBB, Judge. The issue presented here is whether the lower court departed from the essential requirements of the law in conditioning the continuance of a lis pendens on the posting of an indemnity bond. We hold it did and quash the order below. Petitioner, Florida Peach Corporation of America, International Division, S.A. (FPCA), plaintiff below, instituted an action against respondents, Robert Lurie, trustee, et al. (Lurie), in the Circuit Court *340of the Fifth Judicial Circuit seeking a declaratory

FLORIDA PEACH CORP., ETC. v. Lurie

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-03-24

Citation: 411 So. 2d 339

Snippet: and Use of That Real Property, Respondents. No. 82-91. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Brito v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-02-09

Citation: 409 So. 2d 252, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29234

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Appellant, Senen Francisco Brito, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that, it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.

City of Lake Worth v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-11-18

Citation: 184 So. 681, 135 Fla. 68, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1516

Snippet: Bonds numbered 19, 29, 30, 35, 43, 56, 80, 81, 82, 91, 92, 109 to 113 inclusive, 163 and 168 to 180