Florida Statute 83.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 83.19

83.19 Sale of property distrained.—

(1) If the judgment is for plaintiff and the property in whole or in part has not been replevied, it, or the part not restored to the defendant, shall be sold and the proceeds applied on the payment of the execution. If the rental or any part of it is due in agricultural products and the property distrained, or any part of it, is of a similar kind to that claimed in the complaint, the property up to a quantity to be adjudged of by the officer holding the execution (not exceeding that claimed), may be delivered to the plaintiff as a payment on the plaintiff’s execution at his or her request.

(2) When any property levied on is sold, it shall be advertised two times, the first advertisement being at least 10 days before the sale. All property so levied on shall be sold at the location advertised in the notice of sheriff’s sale.

(3) Before the sale if defendant appeals and obtains supersedeas and pays all costs accrued up to the time that the supersedeas becomes operative, the property shall be restored to defendant and there shall be no sale.

(4) In case any property is sold to satisfy any rent payable in cotton or other agricultural product or thing, the officer shall settle with the plaintiff at the value of the rental at the time it became due.

History.—ss. 5, 6, ch. 3131, 1879; RS 1769; GS 2245; RGS 3564; CGL 5428; s. 34, ch. 67-254; s. 19, ch. 82-66; s. 10, ch. 83-255; s. 436, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 83.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.19

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.19

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.19.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 83.19

Total Results: 13

Deparvine v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-29

Citation: 995 So. 2d 351, 2008 WL 4380919

Snippet: is present at the very time." Thayer, supra, at 83.[19] Case Law Under The Evidence Code Since the adoption

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1997-08-05

Snippet: (1986) and 83-90 (1983). 4 Cf., Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 83-19 (1983) in which this office concluded that the board

Pino-Barretto v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-06-14

Citation: 432 So. 2d 791, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20527

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The order and judgment under review are affirmed. The order of probation revocation, however, should be corrected upon remand to reflect, as the trial court announced orally, that the defendant was found in violation upon the sole ground that he carried a concealed firearm.

Walsh v. Walsh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-08-15

Citation: 388 So. 2d 240

Snippet: 3d DCA 1967); see Rollins v. Rollins, 155 Fla. 83, 19 So.2d 562 (1944). When the court granted the wife's

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-05-18

Snippet: applied on the payment of the execution (see ss.83.08-83.19, F. S.). An action for possession of dwelling or

Gilbert v. Gilbert

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-05-17

Citation: 187 So. 2d 49, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5430

Snippet: So.2d 321, 323. . Rollins v. Rollins, 155 Fla. 83, 19 So.2d 562 (1944). .Id.

State v. Hodges

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-12-13

Citation: 169 So. 2d 359

Snippet: 707, 10 So. 2d 492; Rollins v. Rollins, 155 Fla. 83, 19 So.2d 562. We will not, however, affirm the judgment

Fine v. Fine

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-08-02

Citation: 122 So. 2d 494

Snippet: its later case of Rollins v. Rollins, 155 Fla. 83, 19 So.2d 562, the question was specifically raised

Willscott, Inc. v. Ullman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-02-15

Citation: 117 So. 2d 856

Snippet: as provided for in such cases under §§ 83.18 and 83.19, Fla.Stat, F.S.A. It is so ordered. HORTON, C. J

Wick Roofing Company v. Curtis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-04-03

Citation: 110 So. 2d 385

Snippet: Workmen's Compensation Law, Vol. 2, Sections 83.10-83.19; 58 Am.Jur., Workmen's Compensation, Section 554

Graham v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-11-07

Citation: 91 So. 2d 662

Snippet: of Complaint.'" In Rollins v. Rollins, 155 Fla. 83, 19 So.2d 562, 563, we held that the question, in the

Lucian v. Southern Ohio Savings Bank & Trust Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-01-30

Citation: 23 So. 2d 674, 156 Fla. 370, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 858

Snippet: which I agreed, and in Rollins v. Rollins, 155 Fla. 83,19 So.2d 562, which I wrote. For the same reasons I

Stevens v. Ambler

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1897-06-15

Citation: 39 Fla. 575

Snippet: actually attained. Moran vs. Lezotte, 54 Mich., 83, 19 N. W. Rep. 757, It is true that like almost all